"Trans" Tinder date stomped to death

I disagree unless you can make the case for it.

I agree people should be honest.

I don't consider all lies the same. If you lie about being positive for HIV, or you lie about your age to a minor those things should be considered illegal. Praying about your marital status isn't the same thing.

if that's your alternate theory I'll certainly listen to it, but I'll go with what has been said.

 

lets look at this example

women lies about being married, has sex with someone, both her fling and her husband go down on her without knowing she had sex with other men - both men have a right to be angry... but not to kill (and it's not rape)

 

Killing someone can range from sentences of 10 years on up (unless one can show that it was an act of self defense (where the person can argue that their life was threatened) and can depending on area incur a death penalty.

Sexual Assault - 10 years on average.

And I can't imagine that being squicked the hell out after getting his pole smoked by someone with a trouser snake would qualify as self defense.

 

he consented to the person, not a gender, the person is the same person regardless their gender

 

your still the same person before and after.....

muscle builders transform their body, but they are still the same person, with or without muscles

 

did he say that to the victim, or are you saying that?

 

Still haven't said it gives you the right to kill.

I still disagree with you that the lies are equal.

 

your free to disagree

but in this case that is what happened, he killed, that is why it comes up

 

And my reasoning is sound.

it doesn't keep coming up you keep mentioning it as nauseum. That's not because it happened it's because of you.

 

these tread is about a killer killing and some attacking the victim to defend him - I just think there is no defense for the killers actions, we all agree lying is wrong... if he even lied, maybe the killer knew and just wanted to silence him

 

Than go find such people and tell them how wrong they are.

I'm not doing that I'm not going to.

 

you don't think a man would be angry if a woman did that to him? and have a right to be angry? With some other man's sloppy leftovers, now that is two separate persons - but that would still not give the man the right to assault or kill her

 

So this thread is about whether you have the right to be angry or not?

You just told me it was about being against murder.

Make up your mind.

 

oh, so I leave it out of that post, then you pretend not to understand it, see how you are... lol, I will go back and edit it, would not want anyone to be confused

one has a right to be angry, not a right to assault or kill

 

You are asking me irrelevant questions.
Don't get mad at me because you make no sense.

 

well then we agree, he had a right to be angry if he was lied too, he did not have a right to assault or kill anyone

 

not mad at you, lol, just found it funny

 

I've never heard of any prohibition on anger.

Anybody has all the right to be angry about anything they want.

If you want to be angry that the sky is blue you have every right to be. If you want to be angry that Mars exists you have every right to be.

 

Found what funny?

 

Took you longer than it should have to figure that out.

 

that you got upset with me mentioning it was no excuse to kill, then when I did not mention it you got confused because I did not

 

you should of been able to figure it out from the get go, I been saying that all along

 

Oooookaaay

 

Well the first time you said it, I replied that I agreed with you. Saying it all along seemed odd since I agreed from the beginning.

 

did you forget already? lol