What does Critical Race Theory teach?

The links to national numbers do not disagree with the FBI statistics. You are doing what the feces slingers usually do, namely, taking a fiction fed to them by Fox and its ilk and grossly mis-applying it to the real world. None of the links were false. Every link was of a different kind. But you jumble them all together. What is that? Deflection?

 

Ok. You called me dishonest because you missed a link, and now you refuse to retract. Duly noted!

 

No, I called you that because you move the goalposts, deny facts, misrepresent posts, etc.

 

You keep using the No True CRT Fallacy. Can you define it for us? Accurately?

Keep in mind, CRT founders have definitions that are publicly available. Be sure to at least be consistent with them.

 

You're kidding, right? And the Republicans are so famous for their efforts to get along with Democrats?

 

Republicans cave to Democrats all the time. That's how we ended up men in the women's room.

 

No you didn't!

THIS is what you said...

And after I proved that I did include the link, you refused to retracts!

You have proven YOUR dishonesty. Shame on you!

BTW, that is what a quote looks like. You also refused to provide quotes!

 

I didn't refuse. They're readily available statistics from the federal government which have been posted ad infinitum here. I'll take all your nitpicking and hair splitting as a concession, though. Thanks.

 

You could expect it because I am better informed despite the boast in your sig.

https://theunsilencedscience.blogspot.com/2012/12/scientists-rediscover-violence-gene.html

 

This is one of the bigger lies promulgated by the left. The reality of race is apparent to the most casual observer.

 

What the f... hell does that have to do with whether or not I included the link?

Just... go away! What a waste of time!

 

The onus is on you, like it or not.

You can ignore it, fine.

Doesn't change the fact.

 

I listed the numerous posts where you defiantly misread graphs and others’ posts. It it was merely about a missing link, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Did you brush up on your percentages this afternoon?

 

So you can’t address the charts, either. Figures. Can’t follow a thread very well, to boot.

 

I never wanted to put anyone on ignore, but then some posters just turned into pests. Oddly enough, I can almost guess which one you and others are responding to. You want to think that people are interested in honest conversation, yet on the internet, forums everywhere are cluttered by those who seem more interested in being annoying than anything else. For some reason, they are almost always conservative. It is so pervasive, that I wonder if it is not part of the conservative culture. That that nastiness that is so common in Right wing rhetoric is not at play. Listen to enough Right wing radio and this what you get. The same annoying nastiness.

 

You guys crack me up. So self-unaware.

 

I have to agree with Golem on this one. But go ahead a pretend that you are better informed.

 

Shocker.

 

The reality of conservative attitudes towards race are quite obvious and not at all honorable. When you spout your theories about genes and crime, it is quite obvious what is really being said. We know what you are.

 

How dare those mean conservatives want people to be treated equally. Shame.

 

By now it should be quite clear what CRT has become. What it represents to conservatives. It is like they go out of their way to once again demonstrate that conservative principles aren’t all that honorable.

 

Opposition to CRT originated among civil rights activists.

 

Again, you cannot argue the actual facts, so you revert to ad homs. Typical.

 

Wow! Are you defending the OP? Because those are the only facts that have been supported with links, references, studies and analysis in this thread.

 

Are you supporting the tactics of the other poster then? Since other actual facts, like the FBI crime statistics and analysis were offered, which you've ignored. That seems pretty special of you, to leap to the rescue of another poster like this. But it still doesn't bely the fact that the studies offered offer localized inference studies and when compared to the national numbers, don't indicate any generalization. But of course you already knew that, right? Because so many of us have presented the national statistics so often you should know them by rote. But hey, read back a few where the citation was provided and the FBI analysis is there to be reviewed.