What Russia's deadliest nuclear sub could do to the US

Those are all myths.

 

How exactly is the performance of our missiles “scrap metal”? The Trident D4 has never had a failed test.

 

Alaska was bought by America yet you claim it still belongs to Russia. So you have no standard and are a giant hypocrite.

The Baltic states are independent and members of NATO. You want them? Come fight a war for them.

 

Modern Russians don't fight. We saw that when they attacked the Americans in Syria.

They do die quite nicely though.

 

To be far, the PMC tried to use light infantry with no fire support to overrun entrenched SOF backed up by arty and air.

I would not expect a Russian mechanized assault on the Baltic to go the same way. It would be a hard fight, but a fight NATO would win. Especially after B-2’s and cruise missiles start making visits to Russian oil refineries and their economy tanks.

 

Oh no doubt. I was just being snarky with the Russian troll who started this ridiculously stupid thread. Not the first by the way. What kind of idiot starts a thread touting a Russian military capability that has been old hate for the United States for nearly FORTY years?!!

He should've been starting threads back when the Russian/Soviet military actually meant something.

 

You do not know the story at all? But why do you argue about what you do not know? Memorize - Peter 1 bought the Baltic lands along with the wild population who lived on these lands from the King of Sweden.
At the behest of Peter I the Great, the “separate article” was added to the Nishtadt peace treaty, according to which Russia agreed to pay Sweden in four terms over the next 2 years 2 million efimki.
Memorize it and do not write nonsense

 

No, my strange friend. It’s a rusty piece of **** that sunk to the bottom of the ocean. In other words, a Russian sub.

 

Why are you making a big issue out of something that's not at all pertinent to the 21st century threat of Russian aggression?

 

If you come to Russia, you will see that the infrastructure of Russian cities is adapted to overcome any collapse associated with war or natural disasters. For example, all cities in Russia have well-developed public transport. Communal infrastructure is well developed in Russia. It is adapted for use after the collapse of a nuclear war. Also in Russia the system of life support and other methods of life in the post apocalypse are well organized. For example, all metro stations in all cities at the same time are a bomb shelter with fresh water and connections to different points of the city. The metro has special rooms for medical purposes and food storages. I assure you, Russians are much more adapted for survival in the post apocalypse.

 

So what? In Australia, the aborigines also always successfully throw a boomerang. But this does not mean that the Aboregens will be able to destroy the Russian cities. Is not it?

 

Alaska was leased. Therefore, Alaska should also be part of Russia. This is also obvious. Are you unable to understand the obvious?

 

Tell it to the Vietnamese.

 

Was Alaska only leased? I thought it was call "The Alaska Purchase" just like "The Lousiana Purchase" or do I have them mixed up? I know one of them was called "Sewards Folly" but I don't remember which one.

 

Understand. Your submarines do not sink because manure does not sink.

 

That's right. And all they had were pyjamas, flip-flops, and an assortment of mismatched weapons from China, the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia yet they withstood all of the American war machinery with bombers and what-not.

 

Am I making a problem? You did not confuse? I am only responding to comments.

 

Nothing much has changed for the Russkis in terms of "deep battle" theory.....its like Kursk1943....24/7!

 

The "big issue" is in the response made by others to his thread. Should he not reply?

What is this "threat of aggression" you speak of? I look out my window and I don't see it, smell it, or hear it. The only aggression I can see from here is > > > > >

 

How was Baltics "bought" by Muscovite??

Is there a "receipt" somewhere.....like the one we have for Alaska.....iIsuggest you post a link?


Furthermore....it wasn't ...bought....it was invaded and annexed.....and furthermore, Balts are not "Russians".....they're not even Orthodox......Lithuanians are Catholics, Estonians and Latvians Lutherans in cases....no history of being russkis.....so a little bit of history for the misguided destroyer....

 

Wow....did you color that all on your own?

 

The great Admiral Kuznetsov, which often needs to be towed because it breaks down so often:

 

At the behest of Peter I the Great, the “separate article” was added to the Nishtadt peace treaty, according to which Russia agreed to pay Sweden in four terms over the next 2 years 2 million efimki. Learn the story.
In addition, no one says that the wild Baltic peoples resemble Russians. Rather, they are more like the Chukchi. Because for example, the Latvians received a letter writing at the same time as the Chukchi. A bit earlier. For a few years.

 

Yup....the Sovs got their butts reamed in Astan but good.....ass raped, split over open pit fire for BBQ, tail between the legs, and BTW, had an ....Unobstructed....land/air route into Astan 24/7....and still managed to get beaten by "moojahs"!!

USA meanwhile flew 486000 servicemen 6000+ miles over oceans....without disrupting much air traffic, shipping routes, fended off Marxist Soviets/Chinos....and still stand today as the mightiest!)

 

Kuznetsov old diesel Russian ship. Now under repair. Therefore, we will not talk about it. You better tell us about the new American ships.