Whites OBJECTIVELY Have Less Rights than Minorities

All poor people deserve help.

African Americans getting Affirmative Action may follow from laws of Inheritance. Their ancestors were terribly wronged and should have been compensated.

Most peasants in Russia got much greater compensation in 1918.

 

Whites are the minority on this planet. The left hated blacks, now say they aren't racist and their proof is they hate whites. Bizarro world stuff here lmao.

 

At least one false premise and at least two illogical conclusions.

 

well then all this black privilege was reparations then?

I would say debt payed in full then, now time to start helping all the poor equally

should these twins be treated different?

 

Revenge would be denying white people access to banks, access to education, having to sit in the back of the bus, ....how do you suggest leveling the playing field? When a runner has the outside track he or she gets a head start . Look at it that way because black people did not have the opportunity to network etc.

 

We have no problem with discrimination against white people because they have all the privileges. It just sounds to me like you want to be a victim so badly

 

So you DO think revenge is solution? You think it's "fair" to hold back one runner until the other gets to where YOU think they should be. You have to realize that will never work for anyone.

 

if only black people get the aid they need form the government, then what do you call that, separate but equal is not equal, white people are not even allowed on the bus

can you imagine the outrage if they said there was a white only program to help the poor.... that would be just as racist

racism should be called our regardless if the victims are white or black

 

Then you keep your damn mouth shut about discrimination against ANYONE, hypocrite. I'm against discrimination against ANYONE. Wrong is wrong, and two of them don't make a right. Most small children can understand this. It is preposterous that some people really seem to think that "We have no problem with discrimination against white people" is a virtuous position, and can't see that it will only cause more discord - which will adversely affect those in the minority to a disproportionate degree. Good job making things even worse for people dealing with a history of oppression, *******. Typical ****ing democrat.

 

there is both white privilege and black privilege... neither is right

"We have no problem with discrimination against white people"

really, that sounds racist, replace 'white' with 'black' and see how it sounds to you

I have to wonder if people that say things like this are Russian pretending to be black to cause black tensions in the USA?

 

I was gonna like your post until you blamed all democrats, my guess Russians trying to divide us as no one on the left I know would support that

we have to remember we are all anonymous here, could be anyone, from anywhere

same goes with the extreme right and extreme left posts, could just be propaganda from one of America's enemies

 

Not all democrats, but typical. I've never heard that crap come from any other side of the political spectrum.

 

it only comes from white racists and black racists.... and of course those pretending to be such to divide us

someday I think we will be like China and block all outside country network traffic as this is too easy for a outside country to try and manipulate us

 

I guess I haven't made myself clear... it doesn't reduce the problem for those that are now being discriminated against to force results that say discrimination has now been reduced. It is a false statement 3 different ways. It may make one group happy, but it is a false statement if it is strictly based on skin pigmentation.

Let me try it this way.
one side of a balance scale is heavier than the other, both with the same substance. Instead of taking the excess weight from one side and adding it to the other to actually equalize the two, you take a brick and add it to the lighter side, and declare the substances balanced.

 

like the op said though, that woudl be like allowing the cops to harass all black people with stop and frisk because most crime in a area had been committed by blacks

you can't punish an entire race cause of the actions of a few, even if the above worked and helped to solve the problem it would be wrong as it's racial profiling

 

We know the first best isn't achievable. You have two options. Accept that discrimination or reduce the impact through positive discrimination. The latter makes perfect sense as it increases average ability and ensures an outcome closer to the first best. As long as discrimination exists, the approach is rational.

 

what? so you want to not help the poor white folks and only help the poor black folks and do no see that as racist, how about we help them all

 

And there you have it. The left openly advocating for discrimination. I'll stick with the content of a man's character, thanks.

 

This isn't left or right. It is correct reference to the economics.

 

all Americans (whites and blacks) alive today are just as responsible for slavery.. we are all Americans.. none of us were slaves and none of us owned slaves

there should be no government programs that only help poor black children and not poor white children... race should not be the determining factor

 

And to add insult to injury, Black men usually have the biggest penises. Life just ain't fair is it?

 

Sure as hell looks like it is.

 

Then you need to brush up on your discrimination analysis. I've referred to evidence that originates from Becker's taste for discrimination. Being the Chicago School, calling it left wing analysis wouldn't be credible. Left wing analysis would refer, for example, to concepts such as divide and conquer.

 

This isn't even a close 2nd best, it's not a best at all, and somehow, you aren't seeing that. To better one group, you subject the other group to the same indignities and discrimination you are trying to fix in the first place???

This is an absolute bottom line failure.

 

Let’s say, theoretically that a program like stop and frisk targeting blacks worked. That regardless of the reason why it worked, it worked to vastly reduce crime rate.

Would you be in favor of any such policy that benefited society as a whole by grossly reducing the violent crime rate even if it targeted blacks specifically?

For instance blacks and Hispanics are grossly disproportionately represented in gang crime. Could we say put a ban on blacks being able to wear bandanas and if they’re flying colors they’re subject to prosecution?