Who would work harder for what they believe? "Pro-life" or Pro-Choice?

""""And the best you can do is try to insult me""""


He says and then goes on to use a string of childish insults


The only thing you can do is make up stuff.........no where in that post did I insult you.....you are very confused when you see a question mark, it's not an insult , it's a question which


you can't answer....(so maybe you feel like it's an insult because those inconvenient questions make you uncomfortable).

"""""the pro life side (me) has absolutely smoked the pro choice team """""


Oh, you smoked something.......

But stories in a chat room are proof of nothing.

 

What detrimental effect does it have on society, that abortion doesnt?

What's mob rule?

Read the statistics. They state the reasons why women have them.

 

Yes, you are citing what you ARE doing and what you HAVE done.....but as you point out, my question clearly involves the FUTURE tense...."who WOULD work harder"...

and you have yet to answer it. Nor directly answer the questions I asked you...based on supposed "pro-life" claims to belief and their own rhetoric.


So in a post postulating hypothetical future events....what you and your wife DO NOW or HAVE DONE in the past....is irrelevant unless you want to apply it to an answer about what you WILL DO in that hypothetical.....

which you continue to refuse to do....I feel because you know it would contradict your supposed beliefs or show them so much self-righteous posturing or ....show you for a misogynistic totalitarian.

You won't answer direct questions....because it would prove embarrassing to your position or those who hold a similar position.

And you also go for personal insults and ad hominem attacks (on me and Fox).

Both of which show the TRUE moral character of atleast one "pro-lifer"....you.

 

Sam, you've given CONTRADICTORY reasons for why women have abortions.

You've said the ONLY reason they have them is because they're "selfish jerks".

AND you've said that there could be reasons that create "different standards"...so there is NOT just "one reason".

 

Cheating people out of money leads to a drop in trust of organisations, which can lead to less money investment, which can lead to a drop in production, a drop in employment and as such a drop in people's living standards.

Abortion has no detrimental effect on society as a whole .. none, zero, nil.

I am not your mother, neither am I an internet search engine, stop being so bloody lazy and find out what it means.

I have, still doesn't provide a single thing as proof for your assertion .. it is still only your opinion that the reasons given are "selfish" and only for "convenience"

 

Given all the times Sam asks US to give him definitions of words and phrases, I'm wondering if....

A. His parents have a "lock" on him using Google?

or B. If it's simply part of his usual strategy of trying to change the subject when he gets too "uncomfortable" or runs out of talking points or his "facts" get shot down?

I'm leaning towards "B".

 

Yes it does. It harms babies.

Now youre just jumpring thru hoops.

 

Oh gawd, Sam, is this "jumping through hoops" week? You never did learn what it meant...try....

 

Is this the product of home schooling....or Christian fundamentalist private schooling???

If young people like Sam become the majority in this country....we are screwed. China, Russia, India, Europe will all be lightyears in advance of us in science...especially bio-tech.....

and we'll be a country of people who think that a fertilized ovum one second after sperm contact is a "baby" and that Adam & Eve had a pet Triceratops.

And when those other countries show up here and hold out contracts for our "Sams" to sign.....they'll sign them and later ask "What does permanent and irrevocable rights mean?" and the Asians and Europeans will just smile and say "Oh, that's just the fine print....don't you worry about it."

 

nope not one single "baby" has ever been harmed by abortion, your opinion does not reflect reality.

Just to help you out --- yet again --- here are the medical definitions of baby, as I know you have a problem using internet search engines to find things out for yourself;

http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php?t=9072
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/baby

and what hoops would they be, do you deny that it is just your assertion that the reasons given are "selfish" and only for "convenience", if not proof it is not just your assertion.