Who's to blame for the Herman Cain scandal?

If Obama initiated it, then he's responsible for it. Obviously, the media treats members of the two political parties differently so we may never know the truth about any of this.

 

Have some cheese with your whine; your point was pointless by comparing individuals who actually had sex with their women and Cain who has basically been accused of harassment by anonymous women.

Had you taken the time to read the legal description of what constitutes sexual harassment you would have a better understanding of what we are talking of; but alas, that would require effort and Liberals seldom exhibit compunction to exert much effort let alone actually deal with facts and the truth.

Carry on.

 

They arent anon... the ones that are.. have to be .. it was part of the money for silence bargain. The one who says ole hermy tried to get the stinky finger is under no such deal.. she spoke out... not that any of this matters one lick.

Cain is a retard... he is in way over his head. He thought China was still trying to develope a nuke. He is so (*)(*)(*)(*) inept that he cant handle a simple allegation like this .. its his fault this lasted more than a few days as news. He addded fuel to the fire.. with every stupid tactic he tried... ignorance... the pathetic news conference (with no news.. just a denial party).

Cain isnt qualified to be POTUS any more than Obama is. He is a an Ex-Federal Reserve Banker... An Ex Lobbyist CEO... a motivational speaker... at best he can sell a pizza.

What is amazing is that people call this snakeoil salesman a conservative. He gives lip service to social conservatism.... I have a hard time believing a guy who was a FED banker.. who cheered the bailouts of the banks and TARP and 0%interest loans to investment banks is a fiscal conservative... just another deficit spending-taxcutting corporate shill.. the fact that the Koch Bros. think this tool is a good guy says it all about him.

 

Try and follow the logic. It's how arguments are built up. Without it you can't actually have a debate.

If someone says that don't care IF someone is guilty or innocent, then it is perfectly logical to say that they should care IF someone is guilty. And it is perfectly logical to prove that hypothesis by stating that they did care when someone WAS actually guilty of not just the same offence, but a much lesser offence.

Your whole abusive response only follows if I said Cain was guilty, which I didnt. Had you taken the time to read...what I actually posted...yabba yabba yabba....

It's logic. Try and follow it. It will be rewarding and ensure that your arguments are made more effectively in future.

 

This is a whole lot of arguing about a pizza man who is never gonna be president anyway.

Regardless of any questionable activities with former employees, Herman Cain is gonna bury himself with his downright idiotic political stances anyway. If anything I think being accused of sexual harassment has helped distract from his embarrassingly inadequate credentials which are more than enough to (*)(*)(*)(*) him. I do find it pretty hilarious that republicans threw a fit in 2008 about people supporting "an inexperienced presidential candidate" and then turn around to throw all their support behind this bad joke.

Because apparently selling pizza qualifies one better for the oval office than serving as a united states senator.

 

That is a classic. Forgive me for adjusting the capitals to see this jewel in all its splendour.

 

What violations? Are they worse than president downgrades?

 

So you are a Perry supporter; got it.

The notion that Cain isn't as qualified as the next candidate or any who have ever inhabited the White House on the Democrat side is laughably uninformed.

What do I like about Cain; that he at least has a tax plan that doesn't not include the current IRS tax code. I won't support ANY candidate that wants to continue this abomination.

What I don't like are unsubstantiated anonymous character assassinations which only convince the gullible and uninformed. These women offer up nothing more than "because they say so" and as the NRA and Cain has stated, after investigations they found nothing to substantiate them and the only reason for settlements is that they are CHEAPER than going to court even if you are guaranteed a win. These women and their attorneys know it.

If I were Cain, I would be filing a lawsuit against Gloria Allred and her client for defamation of character.

Will Cain survive this empty headed asinine attempt to destroy his good name; probably not.

 

I have to laugh whenever someone claims someone like Cain has inadequate credentials; particularly anyone who voted and will vote again for the moron currently infesting the White House.

 

You have to admit.
Perry apologized to Cain last night at the debate..with his Brain Fart.
Cain said Perry did it..

Perry couldn't remember if he did or not..

So Perry took one for the team..

 

This Guy



​

 

The moron that has actually served in a government role before in his life and didn't develop national tax policy by studying a video game? Yeah what were we thinking?

 

Originally Posted by Truth Detector
I have to laugh whenever someone claims someone like Cain has inadequate credentials; particularly anyone who voted and will vote again for the moron currently infesting the White House.

Yes the one whose only honest moment in his career was when he said this:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2encXLmPDo"]Obama Admits; I Should Not Run For President In 2008 - YouTube[/ame]

But like everything else; he lied and decided to run because his ego is the size of Texas.

But also the one who proved what a moron he is when he said this:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws"]Obama Claims He's Visited 57 States - YouTube[/ame]

The man actually thinks there are 60 states; he visited 57 with one to go, not including Hawaii and Alaska. He's a genius!

The man is the epitome of leftist policy and the massive failure we know as the Liberal ideology.

 

Yep.. the sex harrassment allegations are probably a witchhunt and character assasination. It works like a charm....even if you are innocent, your stigmatized.

Cains real problems are his real past.
1.He was the head of a lobby organization (The NRA).
2.He was a head Federal Reserve banker ( loved the bailouts and is a champion of keynesian economics)
3.Is being investigated for campaign fraud.
4.His campaign manager was banned from wisconsin politics for election fraud
5.Is a self professed religious bigot
6.Is completely ignorant on world politics and is proud of it ( Ubeki-beki-beki stan-stan, China is trying to develope a nuclear bomb).

Cain is a corporate shill. His tax plan is a shallow sales gimmick and he is a double talking moron who contradicts himself in the same sentence so many times its hard to keep track of his bullshiat.

Where you got that I was a Perry supporter I will never know... lol.. did you see my sig?... Its not meant to be a thumbs up for Perry

 

You have the facts... Cain is also pro war, pro Affirmative Action and wants to increase Defense spending.

 

What is wrong with the National Restaurant Association?

What is wrong with experience with the Federal Reserve?

How is he a champion of Keynesian economics? Once more this appears to nothing more than another “because you say so” misplaced opinions you falsely think is a good substitute for facts.

Do you have a link, this is news to me and I have not seen this in any media.

Do you have a link, this is news to me and I have not seen this in any media.

So you hate people of religion?

This is more of “because you say so” than substantive; but as for his lack of experience, it is no worse than the current idiot infesting the White House with his nonsensical drivel, class envy diatribes and divisive rhetoric.

What is wrong with starting your own business and building it into a large corporation?

Nothing much here but another “because you say so.” But alas, the current moron infesting the White House has only ONE tax plan; tax more spend more. ANYTHING would be better.

Again, that sales gimmick is far better than the political gimmick currently called the tax code; but alas, when you are naïve, uninformed and parrot idiot liberal talking points, we can’t expect much more right?

Then who do you support? Obama?