Why the Right Wing Rejects Science

Private sector?

 

Those witty lefties. It’s a laugh a minute.

 

Oh, miscarriage is hilarious.

 

Oh really? So you're saying the parents were dead ???

Hilarious!!



Can't address :

It's easier for Anti-Choicers to use emotional, inaccurate words like "baby" rather than scientific terms because they have no facts and need emotion to sway others.

It's like they call the " innocent lives" of pregnant women and children killed in war "collateral damage" so they can feel emotionally self righteous.

.

Correct. What would it use to have a say? It can't think nor feel.

So?





All human life only has the value that others place on it.

Are you against all wars?

Would you care to address the rest of my post?




Guess I have you stumped








BTW, if someone attacks you do you value their life and not fight back?
Or does your "valuation" of their life drop ?

Ya, I know just more of those inconvenient facts for you to strenuously avoid

 

A miscarriage is an abortion... no human invented miscarriage...

 

Have fun. Lots of words and irrelevant statements but all you have to understand the never disproven fact that human life begins at conception.

 

A miscarriage terminates a human life.

 

And YOU have never said why anyone should give a flying rat's butt about that …..


So what if life starts at conception with , as you contend, dead parents....


I really don't understand why you would let someone beat you up or shoot you or harm you without fighting back.....don't you think that's a little odd?

 

OH WOW ! REALLY!
GEE without YOU to tell everyone that how would we ever know anything that BLATANTLY OBVIOUS



I think our "conversation" is over ...it really wasn't a conversation because all you did was repeat something you learned...over and over again....which isn't much of a conversation nor is it much of an argument and certainly has no meaning...

 

So what ??

 

There never was a conversation.

 

Disingenuous strawman fallacy duly noted and ignored for DEROGATORY reasons.

Which part of that statement needs to be explained?

 

Wrong!

Conception does NOT produce a unique set of DNA!

Minds that are not weak do have a sound grasp of the actual process involved!

 

AKA doing "god's work" for him!

 

OH WOW ! REALLY!
GEE without YOU to tell everyone that how would we ever know anything that BLATANTLY OBVIOUS



I think our "conversation" is over ...it really wasn't a conversation because all you did was repeat something you learned...over and over again....which isn't much of a conversation nor is it much of an argument and certainly has no meaning...

Uh, duh, that's what I just said....and that's why it wasn't a conversation because you didn't read my posts...you just repeated simple bumper sticker level slogans ….but that's OK if you have nothing else..

 

Human life begins at conception. That is accurate and has never been disproven. There is no debate about that.

 

So what?

...it really wasn't a conversation because all you did was repeat something you learned...over and over again....which isn't much of a conversation nor is it much of an argument and certainly has no meaning...


and that's why it wasn't a conversation because you didn't read my posts...you just repeated simple bumper sticker level slogans ….but that's OK if you have nothing else..

 

Simply say you object to the misuse of the word zygote in order to make it more palatable to kill an unborn baby. It seems an onbvios statement for any rational person to stand by.

 

Why would he say he's misusing the word zygote when he isn't ??

Just because you want people to picture a zygote as the looking exactly like the Gerber baby doesn't make it true.

You may hate science but you can't get around it

 

It’s very simple. Disprove that human life begins at conception. You haven’t - you can’t.

 

Right. That's why a criminal who committed a crime and leaves a trace of his DNA cannot be distinguished from the tens of millions of other people in a DNA database.

Right. It's why paternity cannot be proved with DNA.

 

First truth must be understood. Then a society chooses how it will adapt to truth.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So what?

...it really wasn't a conversation because all you did was repeat something you learned...over and over again....which isn't much of a conversation nor is it much of an argument and certainly has no meaning...


and that's why it wasn't a conversation because you didn't read my posts...you just repeated simple bumper sticker level slogans ….but that's OK if you have nothing else..

Again, so what?


What does that have to do with anything?????



...and why do you contend that the parents are not alive at the time of conception?

 

Why all this mental masturbation ?? Human life begins at conception. Prove that wrong.

 

Ironic coming from someone disingenuously misusing the term "unborn baby" when it is actually a fetus. There are no rational people who want to ban abortion and deprive women of their rights.