Will Republicans Elect A Pedophile?

And that's why you and every other Repub are defending Moore and having a sh*t fit over Franken and dredging up Clinton and anyone else you can think of that isn't a Republican.

Most of the GOP are the ones asking Moore to step aside...

it's all the Republican hypocrites on forums such as this who are all of a sudden concerned about innocent until proven guilty...

Been here, done this conversation.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

 

As I said...they already have (probably)...



...CREEPY...and disgusting.

And if he hasn't done it with her...he clearly is DYING to.

 

Yes, dredging up Franken and Clinton and Wiener whoever else is aligned with democrats is done to show the hypocrisy of the left, and to have a good laugh at that hypocrisy along the way.

Franken and that chick isn't a biggie in the greater scheme of things. It's just a reason for a chuckle at the expense of dems who can't seem to get any kind of scandal going before it comes back and bites them on their hypocricital arses.

 

From now on I'll quote you on the Franken thing.

You, and others, still don't seem to understand that it is the Republican Christian party of family values that reeks of hypocrisy every time a Republican brags about grabbing p*ssy or is caught with their pants down...especially with an underage girl....

 

and you don't seem to understand that we'd elect Chester the Molester if he could manage to balance the budget, lower taxes across the board, and get the federal government back to the constitution.

Everybody knew who Trump was when they voted for him. He's been a household name for as long as I can remember. He's a known playboy who turned a small fortune into a very large fortune.

Can he turn the U.S. government around in the same manner? Probably not, but he is doing good enough.

If you can understand that there are people who don't make decisions based upon emotions, but actually value substance over feelings, then you'll have a much better shot at getting under our skin. Fake outrage is not good enough.

 

Yes, that is all clear....you all are sort of admitting that all at the same time as denying it...

it's confusing....

but it's clear....

the Republican Christian family value thing is a complete load of hogwash...always has been really...

Republicans don't give 2 sh*ts about child molesters or Jesus or the Bible or family values or any of that!!

They will, as you said, vote in Chester the Molester if it aligns with their political agenda.

You need to get all your buds together on this so we all don't have to argue this sh*t anymore.

 

Bullshit. You're CLAIMING a hypocrisy of the opposition that YOU are showing

 

and you don't seem to understand that we'd elect Chester the Molester if he could manage to balance the budget, lower taxes across the board, and get the federal government back to the constitution.

We absolutely understand that and have been pointing it out for a year and a half. Too bad your alignment with despicable people is misplaced

Your rare bit of honesty is as refreshing as it is disturbing

 

Nonsense...that has been proven time and time again to be false. Only the ignorant masses buy that..virtually no one who understands economics does.

http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-loan-from-his-father/?utm_term=.caf5609e7737



One...he inherited MANY millions from his very wealthy father. His 'he only borrowed a million' statement...is a utter nonsnese as that was only a small part of what he inherited. Plus, that loan was just an advance on his inheritance.

Two...if he had just taken his inheritance and put it into index funds (which any idiot can do), most people in the know say he would be wealthier then he is now.

Three...he is not worth ANYWHERE NEAR the $10 billion he boasts about. It's probably closer to $2-$3 billion.

Trump's businesses have declared bankruptcy at least 4 times and he has had a half a dozen companies/products that flat out failed.

Trump is NOT a skilled businessman. He is a trust fund boy and a skilled con artist who knows how to impress/con the weak/ignorant/desperate (like his followers - who are mostly weak/ignorant/desperate) who got 'lucky' on real estate and failed at almost everything else.

 

Genghis Kahn did great things for the Mongols, yet didn't care all that much whether a woman was willing to have sex. When he was ready, the women were ready.

Unlike many of my fellow conservatives, I am not going to fall for that fake outrage you lefties throw out there in the hopes that we might forget that the left will lie, cheat, steal, whatever in order to advance your political agenda.

Sorry, but one chester in office (or maybe even ten or twenty) that will stop you guys is a very small price to pay, considering you want us to share the same fate as China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba under Castro, Russia under Stalin, North Korea under the Kim dynasty, Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh, Venezuela under Maduro, etc.etc. etc. etc. etc.

When you leftists came to power after the French revolution, you killed everybody you hated, and then you started killing your own. So think of my honesty as an attempt to save your own neck from your fellow lefties, as well as my own.

Do you care at all about the hundreds of millions that have died at the hands of your fellow lefties once you got your socialist/communist utopias? Nope.

but I do. and that's a bit of honesty that I can live with.

 

And he loves telling everybody else they must live by his "morals".

 

Sorry. No Dems are accused of sexual contacts with 14 year old girls

 

Don't look now, but John Conyers is now on the hot seat.

and those aren't mere accusations. They are lawsuits that have been settled.

As for Moore, I think we can wait until we have a bit more than mere accusations. You can, anyway. I'm just having fun watching this cavalcade of pervs in the democratic party being outed.

 

Well, they have already elected an admitted sexual predator. Trump admitted his prolific sexual desires on the Access Hollywood video.

 

Now that Trump has ENDORSED this PEDOPHILE, maybe Moore will squeak it out?

 

He did indeed...and like 16 women corroborated his admission

 

And they DON'T involve minors.

But even so...He should resign.

You have admitted that child molestation isn't a deal breaker for you.

Oh well...conservatives...

 

Conservatives could do a write-in candidate,

but apparently they dont care if Moore is a pedophile.

they only care about that Senate vote.

 

Is Moore still leading in the polls?

 

But it really isn't a claim by the Wa Po. That is how the spin doctors in the Moore camp want you to think about it so they can falsely claim this all comes from the "liberal media." The accusations come from 9 women. The first, the woman who was 14 when Moore abused her, told friends about it shortly after it happened.
Maybe this will give you the requisite clarity on the matter. If you don't believe Moore's accusers then to be consistent you can't believe Bill Clinton's accusers either.

 

Oh the Irony ... of a Homophobe preaching Gay’s will assault kids in Bathrooms is the one you can’t even turn your back on in the Mall.

 

I hope he Wins ... Alabama deservise nothing but the best in Little Girl chasers

 

It is though.

WaPo went out and constructed this story.

They found these "women", that all somehow magically presented the same cohesive account for 40 year old "facts".
And lets consider those "facts" shall we; addresses, businesses, times, dates.
They give an address of a property Moore owned, so what?
If I had your name I could tell you every house you've ever lived it - its called the internet.
One "woman" references a restaurant with "facts" that others have shown to be incorrect.

WaPo brought in one of its close partners, Gloria Allred, to represent the accusers liars.
Why would WaPo bring in a high priced man hating California lawyer (who specializes in creating witch hunts against men btw)?
What responsibility is it of theirs to do this?
Maybe they want to make sure their manufactured victims don't let slip any of the details behind how WaPo orchestrated this entire saga?

And speaking of ol' Gloria, how come we cant have that yearbook analyzed by a third party?
How come its only WaPo's "experts" that get to see it?
The internet is already full of credentialed and otherwise handwriting experts claiming its a fake based only off the high-res screen caps they have available to them.
Is Gloria and WaPo afraid of what will be proven if evidence is actually examined by impartial investigators?
Reminds me a lot about how only the DNC's "experts" got to examine their hardware after the "Russian hack" /cough bullshit /cough inside job.

I could go on, I really could, just rehashing the same hole-poking truths that responsible media has been doing this entire time.

But I want to know if you have any interest in hearing about the many many cracks in this witch hunt, or have you already made up your mind because there is an "R" attached to Moore's name?

 

Senator Lindsey Graham had this to say about Trump's endorsement of Roy Moore. I couldn't agree with him more (pardon the pun).

He bemoaned Trump's support for Alabama Senate Republican candidate Roy Moore on Sunday, calling the move a lose-lose situation.

"If he wins, we get the baggage of him winning, and it becomes a story every day about whether or not you believe the women or Roy Moore, should he stay in the Senate, should he be expelled?" Graham said on CNN's "State of the Union." "If you lose, you give the Senate seat to a Democrat at a time where we need all the votes we can get.

"The moral of the story is don't nominate someone like Roy Moore who can actually lose the seat any other Republican could win," the South Carolina Republican told anchor Dana Bash. "And what I would tell President Trump: if you think winning with Roy Moore is going to be easy for the Republican Party, you're mistaken."

Now who is responsible for Moore becoming the Republican nominee? Trump's base, that's who. The same people who voted for Trump in Alabama voted for Moore.