Woke LA DA George Gascon SUSPENDS attorney who 'misgendered' transgender child molester.

There are two possibilities as far as I can tell. One is "sex reassignment therapy" and one is "gender-affirming surgery", and both appear to be pretty much the same. Links below. The trouble is, that neither of these describe it as changing one's sex.

Sex reassignment therapy - Wikipedia
Gender-affirming surgery - Wikipedia

 

Actually there are. Scum sucking Democrats want to claim that any law protecting gender applies.

 

Lopping off female breasts or male johnson's is like having a manicure I guess.... lib's continue to amaze me... endlessly.

 

Applies to what?

 

Intentional refusal to use someone's correct pronouns is equivalent to harassment and a violation of one's civil rights. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/sgmro/gender...l to use someone's,, sex, and national origin.

That is the official position of the Biden administration. It is compelled speech. You legally must use what ever made up nonsense pronouns these idiots come up with or you get sued. Thank the Democrats for that bit of insanity.

 

Gender attackers? Do they have tanks? Can you name any great battles?

 

Pronouns? How about adjectives for guys that think they are gals and gals that think they are guys? You know... adjectives like... "nuts"... "crazy"... "weird"... or more detailed descriptions like "out to lunch"... "a few sandwiches shy of a picnic"... "looney tunes" ... and similar?

 

So in a workplace context only?

 

Lib nuttiness is unbounded.

 

Oh... ok... libs are rarely found in a WORK place... its ok. Now if those rules applied in a WELFARE place... ther might be a problem.

 

Does the joke really work though? It seems that most libs are rich white liberals.

 

That is 1984 type thought control bovine schiest. Right now it is the left wing Democrats who support the gender bending and gender confusion crap. That is just one reason that about 25-30 years ago I found myself in a small minority of conservative Democrats who left the Democratic Party instead of supporting crap we could not agree with. Watch out for the crazies who are a sizable minority of what was once the party of Lincoln and Reagan who like MTG and others are using the power of the courts and of government to push their version of social and thought manipulation. Extremes from either the left or the right are dangerous or potentially dangerous.

 

LOL.. nah, you don't get to manufacture this narrative. The video does actually show capitol police shepherding folks into the capitol building. So much for trespassing and all that BS.. In any event, your only narrative is, cops supported Trump? Really? How lame is that? Try simply acknowledging that the narrative you've been pushing for years now is BS. And now you've been painted into a small dark corner. It's of your own making.

 

Active ignorance. How quaint...

 

anyone that helped the Trump supporters commit this crime, was a Trump supporter

can you imagine if black cops assisted BLM and trying to say that proves it was a set-up to frame BLM... same is true here, the right is being ridiculous

 

I suppose your dash to racism is what? The admission that you don't have any other credible response? So, since LOTS of the capitol police are AA, are you saying they are the shadow Trump supporters? Or that because Nancy and Chuck failed to actually provide security for the grounds that they are shadow trump supporters? Your narrative is cycling it's own drain....

 

the cops were white that let them in....trump supporters?

the right needs to stop making excuses for the j6ers

 

Gosh, so you admit there actually is video, and that you've been able to determine racial context.... So much for your own "fake news" BS.... LMAO.....

 

So if sicko “identifies” as a dog and is on trial for biting someone is the prosecutor and judge obligated to sniff the “canine’s” butt or be sued?

 

The Capital police did divert some terrorist intruders down a hallway or a staircase to get them away from congressional members. That is a matter of video documentation and statement given under oath.

 

ah, so you admit they were Trump supporters (we can both play that game)

anyone that assisted the J6ers should be investigated

 

It begs the question though, why did, if as we are you are parroting, that the capitol was "under assault" why capitol police allowed folks to enter then. So, now we have access to that video, it surely does undermine the narrative you seem willing to continue to parrot.

 

LOL.. nah. the assertion was yours. Again, suddenly, there is video, a comment that we know even you think is BS, because you then referenced the same. Just more BS then from you.

 

They did not “allow “ them to enter but they entered after they breached the defense perimeter. Or if you would like “police” traitors who were sympathetic to the insurrection terrorists.

 

Hmm.. Problematic given the video evidence that the capitol police were actively waiving folks inside. Your narrative is falling apart.