Zimms "Don't pass the smell test" #1...the bloody head.

Are you denying that the Dept of Justice has categorized assault and murder by race (including the race of the victim) and made the statistics public? I am pretty darn sure those statistics were accumulated using tax dollars and made available to the public because of freedom of information.

From the Federal Bureau of Investigation website: Murder victim by race, and murder offender by race.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...w-enforcement/expanded/expanded-homicide-data

 

shave in the shower? if you cut yourself you won't know about it until you dry yourself off. blood is water soluble. just another point in Zimmerman's story that's supported by the evidence and kills the crackpot guesses about what happened. blood reacts to gravity like everything else. if he was on his back blood from his bleeding nose would have gone into his sinus cavities and from his scalp onto the sidewalk.

- - - Updated - - -

the FBI is racist!!1!

 

What does the blood turn clear in the shower?

Really, why is it then it doesn't get a blood stain out of clothing.

Where would it go when he sat up? Where would it go when he was standing up? He didn't have any blood on the front of his clothes, when I have had a bloody nose it dripped down on my shirt.

[

 

the first thing you're suposed to do with a blood stain is rinse it in clear water. you're 52, you should be able to do your own laundry by now.

 

Your right, but that doesn't necessarily take that stain out does it. Zimmerman's clothes looked like he had went home and changed, are you telling me that the rain washed all visible blood off his clothes. As a matter of fact it was light showers that night, not a monsson.

 

what is that jacket made from? i have shirts for work that grease doesn't stick to, i doubt blood diluted with rain would either.

 

Man, he must have been bleeding like a stuck pig to get that much blood on his jacket. Wow with all that blood I am surprised he isn't dead.

 

Moderators, please judge my response to the above leftist on the basis that he's accusing me of lying. Like a typical leftist, he personally attacked me for having the gall to state the TRUTH!

What is it you don't understand about race-on-race violence, lefty? The numbers I quoted came directly from US Government data! I told you that those data show that there were 15,869,972 total crimes involving black-on-white OR white-on-black violence between 1996 and 2008. I also told you that of those total black/white crimes of violence, 13,728,242 were committed BY black AGAINST whites. Are you smart enough to divide that number by the total??? I'll do it for you. The answer if 86.5%.

Don't we have rules here about needing to support our claims with actual FACTS and/or logical argument??? If so, Johnnymo seems to have missed that rule. Instead of presenting any facts whatever, he simply calls me a liar, and expects that to be sufficient. I don't find it sufficient nor intelligent, and I'm telling him so,

 

Well give us a link and that will put the issue to rest.

 

The Government has an entire website of such statistics. Read my original post. The data I provided came from every year from 1996 through 2008.

Here is a link to the 2005 data. Look at the Table of Contents and go to Table 42. You'd need to look at every year, and use the Table 42 data from each. The 2005 data shows there were 1,106,097 Total cases of black-on-white and white on black violence. Of that total 1,003,060 cases involved black criminals and white victims. In 2005, blacks committed 90.6% of all such crime, dividing the second number by the total. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0506.pdf.

 

How about posting a link to the 2008 data or even the 2010 data then that will put the argument to rest.

By the way what caused this eruption in crime in the BC?

 

As a white guy, I'm happy that I am immune to murder charges. Yes, one point for us white people.

 

I see the Trayhuggers are still whining....LOL! The JFTM crap is as dead as Trayvon....hoodies up!

Time to move on and get over it.

 

Here is the link to the 2008 data you requested. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0806.pdf. Again, Table 42 is the one that’s relevant to this discussion. Table 42 hasn’t been posted on the US Government site since Obama’s election in 2008. Makes me wonder if he and Eric Holder don’t like what the facts tell the American public! In 2008 there were 964,479 total cases of interracial crime involving only whites and blacks. Of those total cases, 789,960 were perpetrated by black offenders against white victims. In 2008, blacks committed 82% of all black-white interracial violence.

You won’t find the answer to your question in the data. My opinion is that one of the major reasons is the despicable manner in which whites have been demonized in the minds of blacks by leftist race baiters. The media has allowed that to occur by failing to call-out the liars. Such race-baiting hasn’t been tolerated in whites for many years, and shouldn't be! It is not only tolerated in blacks, the black race baiters are enabled in their bigotry by most in the mainstream media. “Whites are always guilty, and blacks are always innocent” is the mantra of these race baiters.

The fact is that the safest place for any black citizen to be is in the company of white citizens!!

 

Absent fathers.

 

I can't find any of the info/tables to which you refer.

 

I just clicked on the link I posted, and it took me directly to the 2008 Table. The Table is in .pdf format. Perhaps you don't have software that can view .pdf files?

 

There's 29 pages and i don't see any off the tables you reference.

 

Us Whites get arrested and convicted of murder. WTF are you talking about? You blacks just either get caught more or you just kill more people. I think it's a mixture - blacks kill more people than Whites do, AND they get caught more easily because they aren't smart enough to get away with it (supported by studies on race versus IQ). Now the pro tip here is really that if you aren't smart enough to get away with the crime, just don't do it in the first place.

Why do you never go on a tirade against blacks telling them to be less criminal and/or more educated? Are you OK with the criminal statistics and education statistics by race?

 

And the source of their findings the FBI Uniform crime statistics, you want another source or care to address the findings, I have no idea whom this particular group is but their findings mimic those of others using the same source data.

So are you disputing it?

 

Fill in the blanks you dishonestly left out first

Originally Posted by Pardy View Post
And Zimmerman chose to follow a kid........................... .............................. ...........kill him.

 

Fresh blood yes it takes most of it out, liquid uncoagulated blood is 80% water. Once exposed to air in an open wound a biological and chemical reaction occurs but as you may note that unlike some alien species in movies our blood doesn't coagulate immediately and has to do so under certain conditions, when it doesn't it can kill you in what is known as an internal blood clot.

 

And Zimmerman chose to follow a kid AND kill him.

 

BWAHAHA! It is good to see these flamebait threads getting moved and deleted. Martin is dead and George is free.....get over it already.

 

It appears that the link I posted is simply the Index to the 2008 data, not the actual data The data are in Table 42 at http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0802.pdf. I apologize, but there was only one number different between the earlier link I posted and this one.

You should now be able to find any of the data by year for 1996 through 2008 if you change the last part of the link following the slash /. Whereas 2008 data is at /0802, 2006 data should be at /0602, 2005 data at /0502, etc. For some reason, the years in the 1990's are linked differently, the last numbers being /cvus9603 for 1996, /cvus9703 for 1997, /cvus9803 for 1998, etc. The Justice Department makes accessing these data as difficult as possible!