What Russia's deadliest nuclear sub could do to the US

MY FIRST QUESTION IS THIS: Why am I actually sitting here at this very moment replying to this rubbish you've just written? THAT is the question I will be asking myself the rest of this day. OK let's go beyond on that. In for a penny in for a pound as they say.

I never said self-propelled howitzers are tanks. I didn't say B-52's are tanks either but I did include both in my response about what the Vietnamese had in the way of weaponry vs. what the U.S. had in weaponry ..... yet the Vietnamese won the war anyway. So ..... by you claiming I said the tanks were this and that was an "absurd" comment/conclusion made by you. Do you understand now? If you insist on repeating it I will no longer respond.

NEXT. What you say about contractors not wanting war is nonsense. Have you ever heard of a man called Dwight D. Eisenhower? I am talking about him as president not his military capacity. Have you heard of him? Do you know what he said about the "Military-Industrial Complex"? Do you not know he warned the U.S. (and the world) about that Complex and what it was capable of doing .....how we should be worried? Do you know that? If not look it up and you will find that you are wrong on so many different levels to make your head spin.

NEXT: I really do not care what you believe about me and my military experience in Vietnam. You insinuating that I am lying reminds me of the Ameican children's argument. But I do remember the rules so if you insist on playing the game then I know the answer is, "I'm rubber you're glue". Gee whiz, you are so boring.

 

Then do yourself a favour and refuse to do it. If you say something intelligent I will agree. If you say something stupid I will disagree. If you say nothing at all then your torment is over.

I'm not holding a gun to your head. I'm not even asking for your name, rank, and serial number. I'm not asking anything from you. What's the problem? Why are you blaming me for your lack of knowledge? If you actually know something then we can share it and discuss the details, but if you know little to nothing ....... well ..... what do you want me to tell you?

 

I remember now. It wasn't RT. I was a bombastic Russian who has his own YouTube channel. He is always over the top but he is entertaining. I have checked some of his assertions and occasionally he's right. He calls himself Barelius ... or something like that.

 

Then why did you assassinate him?

 

This is not an aircraft carrier. This is a cruiser.

 

Yes, that's right. It is a cruiser, not an aircraft carrier.

 

Yup....and a destroyer isn't a destroyer....but really a tugboat, keep drinking the "samogon", comrade, your postings are about as hilarious as Archie comics,lol.

 

It does not matter. Just the US has a boomerang more than Papuan.

 

This is not true. And you yourself will soon realize this.

 

Read and weep:

 

Russia is the freest and most peaceful country in the world. Russia does not start wars. Regarding the Baltic States, Russia simply returns its. If someone stole a car from you, but you found this car and returned it to yourself, this is not aggression. Is not it?

 

There are only American trolls. It is obvious.

 

You are naive. The US has already used nuclear weapons against civilians. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

 

Russia does not attack. Russia is defending. Naturally, Russia has nuclear submarines near the US coast. It is natural that if the corresponding devices record the launch of a ballistic missile, the Russians will immediately respond to the aggression.
The madmen in the White House and the Pentagon want to use ballistic missiles with a non-nuclear charge. But the Russians do not know what kind of charge is on this rocket. Therefore, the answer will be immediate and such as a response to a nuclear attack. On Thursday, Putin said this.

 

The U.S. did not assassinate Diem. We knew before hand that he was going to be overthrown and basically told the coup leaders in South Vietnam that we didn't mind if they did it, but the U.S. wasn't the ones in charge of the coup. And Kennedy and Johnson were by all reports shocked and upset when Diem and his brother were murdered.

 

Do you communicate on social networks using "Ctrl + C" - "Ctrl + V"? Try to write something else. For example, your opinion on this issue.

 

Even in the southern United States, you are not allowed to shoot someone in the head just to reclaim your stolen property.

 

Maybe the US stole more. And you are right. I will not argue.

 

So what? Are your southern states a benchmark in how to get your property back? Maybe the United States will first return to the Mexicans what the United States stole from them? For example Texas.

 

Texas won their independence from Mexico/Spain then chose to join the United States on their own.

The United States after the Mexican/American War paid Mexico for the territory we seized. Something we were under no obligation to do by the way.

 

Because it represents a threat to Russia. But why when the Russians place missiles on their territory, for example, in the Crimea, the Kuril Islands or Kalinengrad, this don’t like NATO?

 

You mean that Texas acted like the Crimea?

 

Such missiles threaten U.S. allies.

And how do anti ballistic missiles of the U.S. threaten Russia? IIRC our current generation of ABMs don't even have warheads.

 

Uh yeah.....read, but not weep, key word, airplanes....dude, OK, Kutzhisownnutzofis an ACC with a flight deck, with numerous jets, big difference....I realize its hard for you ....to understand, thingybawwb.