List the physical evidence sexual abuse and battery of E Jean Carroll by Trump

That is not physical evidence. That was what is called "hearsay".

 

So no evidence. Got it.

 

You have offered noting outside of your opinion

I do notice how similar they are — both are trying to target the president with zero evidence and both were obtained by obvious political

I am denying what Ashley wrote because there is no evidence (that I am aware of) which is why I asked you to provide some and you are now trying to stop the entire discussion.

I asked for proof and now you want to “dispense with further discussion”.

How laughable

Let me know if you can come up with actual evidence (which I am guessing you couldn’t find since you didn’t post it)

 

A court disagreed with you through unanimous decision. Are you saying all 9 jurors are anti-trumpers?

 

No, you've dismissed so, so this is about done.
1) hunters laptop is absolutely real. Undeniable. Those photos the left triggered over came from hunters laptop.
2) if ashleys diary was a fake no one could have been charged with stealing it, could they?
3) if it was a fake why was the fbi compelled to pull a raid to rcover it?
4) ashley hasn't denied its hers, has she?

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portr...l-as-the-kennedys-and-protected-by-the-press/

 

And so far has zero links to the president. So what’s the relevance?

I didn’t say her diary was faked.

It was project veritas weaponizing stolen material in an attempt to damage a president from a private source

I don’t think they have even acknowledged it, it would just give credibility to it. I have seen many people saying online she denied it but I cannot find anything either way or another.

The NY Post didn’t source where they got that exert. Did you really just mock snopes and post the Ny Post?

That’s funny as hell man

I didn’t ask for a tabloid, I asked for evidence

Do you have any? (For the record, I do think Biden is a creepy old man — and it is strange to shower with young children but not unheard of, especially in other nations where they are less stressed about nudity around family members)

It’s also not illegal

Entering dressing rooms to perv on the women, is

 

That story is largely basically accurate (without the detail) but there are two further relevant bits. She immediately complained to, two other people....ie recent complaint.

 

You don't answer mine, so why should anyone answer yours?

 

So why did he not say that in the Witness Box under oath in evidence at the first Trial?

 

So let me get this straight. First of all, do you really believe Snopes? Second, why would someone need to steal her diary if they were able to forge her handwriting and then write a whole new one and add in even more sinister details? Third, don't you find it strange that the passage was in the MIDDLE of the diary, meaning the alleged forger continued to write page after page after page of whatever gobbledygook he can come up with which was never questioned for its authenticity?

 

Snopes isn’t super unreliable, even in independent study they are fairly accurate and match other fact checking sites

https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/fact-checking-fact-checkers-a-data-driven-approach/

They also typically have sources listed

I am not going to say they are perfect but are generally well regarded

The theft of her diary has been proven and the two individuals trying to sell it admitted as such.

Like I have said earlier though, it’s not unheard for parents to shower with very young children and the diary doesn’t indicate anything sexual occurred.

Biden was alive when boys swam naked with girls in public pools and America has grown anti-nudity more and more each year as puritans have gotten involved. They would freak if they went overseas in some areas where families go to nude beaches.

 

Don't forget this:
New evidence supporting Tara Reade's allegation against Joe Biden emerges

 

Moving the goal posts? No connection to biden?
Really?

And yeah, minimaize all of it.
Source attacking, guess at bidens motivation, jump on that high moral ground and accuse someone of slandering biden?
You still think the Steele dossier is legit I suppose.

Nope. I'm all done here.

 

The big bad orange man hurt their feelings and that is all that matters to them in their blind quest for vengeance

 

You are the one that brought up the laptop. And no — you guys have wasted over a year trying to attach the laptop to Joe.

So you took issue with my source, so I gave you four more and now you are upset that I took issue with your single tabloid newspaper

Speaking of moving the goalposts

Thank ****ing god. It was getting more and more pathetic by the second. I do hope you keep your word

toodeloo

 

I'm saying that in a lawsuit the only thing needed to be found "guilty" is feelings. Not evidence. You were asked for evidence. You have yet to provide any. Just claims and feelings, that's all you have. It may be enough for you. It's not enough for me. I like evidence. I like facts. I like a dispassionate court system.

 

I've answered yours. Look to my sig, first line.

 

I posted the evidence laid out in the prosecution.

If you don’t like the way our court system works with a jury of your peers then I am sorry, but those 9 people had the same “feelings” after hearing the evidence listed.

 

Again, there was no evidence. Just claims. Perhaps your problem is you don't know the difference between claims and evidence? What you linked to would not have made it through a criminal trial, we both know that.

 

~ He raped me too ! It's a repressed traumatic memory, but it's there . "
Let's both go see Gloria Allred ...

 

What do you call what a sworn witness says in a Witness Box over there? It's called evidence down here.

 

Its called hearsay evidence here. Its a he said she said type deal and most people generally don't give it much credence. What was asked for in the OP is physical evidence. Got any? Nope, you don't. Because there is none.

 

Is this correct @Turtledude ?

 

I'll admit I may have the wording wrong. I'm no lawyer. But its most definitely not physical evidence like was asked for, and you seem to be avoiding that part.

 

I say just go forward with suing Kimmel. No one should get away with anally raping you. Let us all know how it goes. Good luck.