List the physical evidence sexual abuse and battery of E Jean Carroll by Trump

How much money can I get for that time Trump raped me in a MacDonald's bathroom in the 80s with no proof?

 

You're gonna be waiting awhile. Cause the only physical evidence she produced was a picture of her and Trump together at an event.

 

Yeah a civil case with literally zero evidence that she can't win on appeal.

Hence why none of you can produce one shred of evidence that Trump did anything she claims.

Cause everyone here knows if yall could you would. But you can't. So you don't.

 

The Jury disagrees with you.

Sorry your boy lost................again.

 

Juries of the sexual abuser's peers assessed all the evidence and his defense attorneys' attempts to refute it - as well as his whining about it.

His lickspittles worship the Cry Baby Loser as always chaste and truthful, above the law.

Like any other American, the Loser has the right to appeal the verdicts.

If he appeals the verdicts, the appeals will also be assessed, but not by a jury of his lickspittles who worship him.

 

No it'll eventually be by the scotus who will require some evidence. Got any? Cause she sure as hell didn't have any.

 

I am not filing any appeals nor contesting any regarding the sexual abuser.

I respect America's justice system.

 

We will see if you still that way after 4 more years of Trump and it being our turn to weaponize the justice system in our favor against our political opponents.

 

Yep, he did. And you're happy that absolutely no actual evidence was used to get that loss. Who cares about facts and evidence when you have hate? Its the Leftist Identitarian way.

 

Uh huh...so you never once complained about the decision to scrap RvW? I find that hard to believe. Shall we look through your posting history?

 

If you have any credible evidence of someone "weaponizing the justice system," you should reveal your source(s).

 

Yes. Look through my posting history. You may learn a few things.

 

Sure that's what we are gonna tell y'all when we bring your political candidate up on charges in a deep red district with an innominate jury with literally zero evidence.

"You have evidence this is weaponization of the justice system other than the fact we are using an anonymous jury in a deep red district with no evidence? No? Oh that's too bad."

 

Sorry Bob to hear about your little episode...

First, your need to drop the "95 reference... approximately 26 years ago will work it seems...

Second... You'll need LA to create out of whole cloth a new but temporary law that would fit your case and lasts only ONE YEAR that would enable you to sue Jimmy...
""Empowers Survivors of Sexual Offenses that Occurred When They Were Over the Age of 18 to File Suit Regardless of When Abuse Occurred
One-Year Lookback Window Begins Six Months from Signing""
https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-adult-survivors-act

 

LINK: CIA fast-tracked letter that falsely suggested Hunter Biden laptop was Russia op (nypost.com)

 

I patiently await your sharing your sources for your imputation of the sexual abuser's peers.

 

I am unaware of any suggestion that the sexual abuser molested a laptop computer. I have seen no evidence that he did so.

Are you claiming that the juries of the sexual abuser's peers were all Russian agents?

 

Oh I'd love to. But you clowns used an anonymous jury so nobody could find out their bias. But don't worry. That's not gonna fly on appeal.

 

You've seen no evidence he sexually abused anyone either. If you have, produce it.

 

@Bob Newhart

Third... Bob... use the word rape up to 60 times in your court filings, and then the jury will determine you never was raped, but sexually abused..


https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23808623/govuscourtsnysd5900451740_1.pdf

 

Despite the sexual abuser's lickspittles' hysteria over the verdicts of juries of his peers, I have not seen charges filed against any of them.

The paranoid delusion appears to be meritless.

 

I see you're deflecting away. You asked a question. It was answered. If you didn't want it answered you shouldn't have asked.

 

That was easy. Not only do you show anger at the RvW being overturned but you also show anger at another judge.

Proving your statement here is BS.

 

No, in the age of trump it's to protect them from harassment and harm.

 

There was contemporaneous confirmations, that when she was assaulted, she told certain friends who corroborated the event when it happened, and the Jury believed them.

If you make something up, like you are saying, there won't be any contemporaneous confirmations. Normally, when someone assaults you, you tell friends.

Sure, your friends can conspire with you, but a good lawyer can trip them up on cross.

If it is true, they won't be so easily tripped up, and that is what happened, the jury believed Carrol and her friend's corroboration of contemporaneous informing.