9/11 - WTC Building 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

Really? I challenge you, where did I make that claim? Perhaps you should explain. Oh, that's right...unless you cut and paste another's post or video, you can't.

Explain how the first floor impacted by the above 20 floors, should have been able to stop the block of the 20 above floors downward collapse.

 

How cute.

 

Hey BJ,

How did the upper mass of this building destroy the larger, lower mass WITHOUT thermite and explosives?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCjEi4z2KZA

Looks like you STILL don't understand how to properly apply Newton's Law. That upper section should have never reached the ground right? The lower portion, which was supporting the upper section, was much larger.

How did this happen?

 

Shocker.

 

because it was a demolition that is why they have all the demolition equipment there

 

Which is as clear as a sunny day.

 

Your destruction by you posting rebuttals like "Take a physics class" or "I'm not explaining things to someone who doesn't understand"? That destruction?

By all means BJ, bring it. I will be waiting here.

 

So explain BJ!!! I'm all ears!

You say that a smaller mass above cannot crush a larger mass below. How did they accomplish that in the video I posted? I just crushed your supposed understanding of Newton's Law and how you wrongly applied it to complex structures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCjEi4z2KZA

I can't wait to see you explain this away1

 

you really just need to accept reality for an answer, I already explained to you the building was a demolition

what dablunder site said it wasnt?

 

I'll say this REAL slow for you Koko.

The video I posted completely destroys BJ, Quantum's, and your "understanding/application" of Newton's Law and how it affects complex structures.

Was that slow enough for you?

You all say that the larger mass of the lower potion should stop the descent of the mass of the upper, smaller portion based on Newton's Law. So how did the smaller, upper portion of the building in my video crush the lower, larger portion of the building?

I'll wait here.

 

it was a demolition

how come the greater mass above did not cause this to turn into a pancake? newts laws stand yours fail.



nope no pancake here

thats why people keep saying that a small physics education does wonders for those who want to argue about the physical universe

 

Correct!!!!

So answer the question Koko. How did they use the smaller, upper portion of the building to crush the larger, lower protion of the same building? With no explosives or thrermitic material.

According to you and everyone else, Newton's Third law should have prevented this.

Are you getting it yet?

THE UPPER, SMALLER PORTION CRUSHED THE LARGER, LOWER PORTION!

 

preparation

 

Preparation? Like what Koko?

Are you suggesting that they removed enough mass of the lower portion of that building to become smaller then the mass of the upper potion so it can crush it?

Please explain. It's all about mass right? According to your understanding of Newton's Law and how it applies to a complex structure.

I'm waiting.

 

thats what you seem to think, according to your laws of physics. however this is not a pancake so we question your laws of physics



in fact if there were a driver they would have come out without a scratch!

 

Sorry Koko! I can QUOTE you where you guys state that according to Newton's Law, the larger, lower portion of a buillding should ALWAYS resist the upper, smaller section falling on it. According to you guys, it's strictly about mass.

Want me to post the quotes here?

 

you guys?

one extra floor is meaningless

 

One extra floor?! What are you talking about?

And yes "you guys"!

 

I guess that lower portion of the building in that video must have had a controlled demolition! Yeah, thats it!

- - - Updated - - -

Explain how the first floor impacted by the above block of 20 floors could have stopped that blocks downward motion.

 

yeh thats exactly why there is a demolition crew there LMAO

 

Quote from QuantumHead:

So any "lower portion" that is heavier than an upper portion AND was previously holding up the upper portion at rest, SHOULD NEVER crush the lower section.

That video proves you and everyone else who follows this garbage application of Newton's Law to a complex structure is WRONG!

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

 

yes the wtc was progressively built heavier toward the ground, I see no problem with what he said, whats yours?

we still have the problem that according to your laws of physics this should have been a pancake

 

How did the smaller, upper section of the building crush the lower, larger section of the building in my video? It meets both criteria presented in Quantumhead's explanation and he says that it can never happen.

Explain.

 

yeah so, the heavy equipment pulling out the side of one floor, you know the obvious, real reason....is something you ignore. Based on your ability to ignore what's right in front of your eyes, can't say I'm surprised.

 

The secret to beating a truther at a game of Jenga is to always take a block from the upper portion of the tower.