9/11 - WTC Building 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

That is hilarious. Bravo!

 

but thats a car not a building.

how come it did not turn into a pancake using your physics.

 

That's not how it works in a debate Koko.

I asked you first to explain how the smaller, upper portion of the building in my video crushed the lower, larger portion of said building. It meets both criteria posed by Quantumhead which are:

1. The lower portion previously support the upper portion
2. The upper portion was smaller than the lower portion

According to you and the other truthers, if a structure meets the above criteria, then, based in Newton's Law, the upper portion should NEVER crush the lower portion.

How did it happen then?

 

This, BTW, has got to be the dumbest example/comparison I have ever seen.

How does this even remotely match the twin towers collapse and you application application of Newton's Law to them?

If I drop an aluminum ladder lengthwise onto my concrete driveway from my roof, why does it not completely pancake itself?
If I drop a full pop can onto my concrete driveway, why does it not pancake itself?

Are you friggin' serious?

Again, because of your lack of reading comprehension, the upper section of the twin towers did not pancake or crush the lower section. It tore through the lower section by way of the force of the descending debris overcoming the individual connections which were not designed to resist the force that the descending debris generated.

Why can you guys not get this correct?

 

the secret to beating dablunderers is point out it did not collapse straight down



but then it didnt have majik fires and unknown damage

 

based on your physics it should have, why didnt it

- - - Updated - - -

go back and read it over and over until you understand it, I already explained it.

 

Please explain how the first floor impacted should have been able to stop the downward motion of the above block of 20 floors.

 

I told you it was a demolition, it did what it was intended to do. Dont you understand how demolitions work?

 

That was Verniage. Do you not understand how Verniage works, or are you claiming the destruction at WTC was a Verniage demolition?

 

You explained nothing.

All you said was that it was a demolition.

The fact remained that according to you and your cohorts, a smaller upper section cannot crush a lower larger section. PERIOD!

How did that happen in the video if you guys are correct?

- - - Updated - - -

WAIT!

I think I have it! Koko thinks the towers where constructed with crumple zones!!!! Is that right Koko?

 

Demolitions where?...on what floors? While I'll not follow you down the rabbit hole, I will watch with great enjoyment.

 

http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2012/10/18/lies-damn-lies-and-hasbara-fiction-training-given/

Marcus Sheff, executive director The Israel Project (TIP)

Anyone who studies 9/11 long enough with access to the kinds of material available on the net (uncensored by Jew owned media) will be drawn inexorably to a singular conclusion:




The Zionist network understands what a public relations disaster this will be if the majority of Americans ever grasp the full scope of all that it implies.

Therefore their public relations ministers and propaganda teams are working at full tilt to extinguish any potential sparks they feel could potentially erupt in a blaze of public enlightenment.
The stakes are enormous. Therefore they will spare no effort or expense.

As things stand, the teams of Hasbarat disinformation agents and US Sayinim are really feeling their oats (chutzbah) as they are fully confident that the ignorance, complacency, and brainwashed minds of the US goy population will carry the day.


All who post here having caught a whiff of the terrible stench which arose from Kosher report on 9/11 should do so with the firm understanding that no amount of evidence, no matter how convincing will ever sway those who assault them from ever changing their position. They can't! The reasons why should be obvious.

Their attitude stems from the Machiavellian philosophy which is central to the Talmudic doctrine in which they are steeped. For them, the ends always justify the means. This includes everything from lying to murder.
So don't ever expect anything less from them. Ironically, I doubt if anyone else reading these words would be better equipped to see the Zionist hand in 9/11 than the Jews themselves!

But they are smug in the surety that the subject of 9/11 will fade into history just as the question of the Kennedy assassination did. The revelation of truth is not their object. Jewish eschatology states unequivocally that their ultimate goal is world domination. How this may be achieved is not important to them so long as it is achieved.

The book of Revelation rightly calls these "Jews" a synagogue of Satan. As such they are not only in the world, they are of it. A tiger can never change it's stripes. A house divided cannot stand. Therefore they will always be rank and file with everyone else whose God is lucre.

Nevertheless I encourage as many of you who will to continue pursuing the truth for as long as you are able. And try to be faithful to the promise given in the Bible that those who love lies and willingly do evil in this world will ultimately receive their just reward, if not in this world, then in the one to come.

Try not to be too dismayed because you are unable to see the wheels of justice in progress. If they work at all the credit is not due to any man made institution.

 

I think once he looks it up, he'll start dancing yet again.

 

I got tired of koko's 'dance' long ago,right after he insisted electricity wasn't a form of energy...

 

Hmm.

What you've presented here is a piece of engineering that was specifically designed to transfer energy around the passenger compartment. To "explain" it we'll need some data that you forgot to tell us.

If you tell me the height of the release, we can calculate the car's speed at the point of impact. At an estimated 40' of drop, this puts the car at about 34mph when it impacts the ground. If you tell me the mass of the car, we can determine the force at impact. I should hope the depicted engineering would withstand such an impact without major compromise of the passenger compartment. I'd be glad to do the math though and figure out exactly what happened.

Now what does this have to do with a building?

 

Because it is not a blueberry pancake?

 

I have to admit,reverend,that was funny...

 

Why thank you Texan.

That is how ridiculous 9/11 has gotten. 3000 people died and NIST lied. NIST committed fraud in their official report. Whoever defends that crime is part of the cover-up of conspiracy to commit mass murder. They are an accomplice to conspiracy after the fact. It makes no difference if one tries to be anonymous on the Internet or whether one is readily identified by State sponsored ID. They are just as responsible. Whoever is covering up the crime is responsible for murder. Mass murder. It is a serious crime.

 

Then why do you turn it into a joke?

 

Tell you what BJ.

You want me to provide you with my name and address so you can formally accuse me of being an accessory to murder?

That's a serious accusation right there. You have the balls to follow through with it?

 

coping mechanism?

 

Is this something you learned in Clown College?

 

I am just saying that do not be surprised if someone shows up at your door. Conspiracy to cover-up mass murder is a serious crime.

- - - Updated - - -

I am just saying that do not be surprised if someone shows up at your door. Conspiracy to cover-up mass murder is a serious crime.

 

Tell you what.

I work at a law firm. I'll talk to a few attorneys here and see what the deal is with this type of situation. When I get some information back, I'll send you a number that you can call me at here in my office. Have your attorney ready and we'll have a conference call where you can directly accuse me of being an accessory to the murder of 3,000 people. You can then file the correct paperwork with your attorney, get it into the system, and we'll get started.

Fair enough?