911 World Trade Center Tower "Collapse", a new "Demolition" Euphemism!

yeh I sorta guessed maybe you did not mean it that way lol

 

​

why didnt the news show this to anyone?

yeh here is the best description I have heard yet:


[video=youtube;csIBHrzzrQM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csIBHrzzrQM[/video]



that potato is too (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hot for kids on this board!

Cant even address one single issue and I have already had shrimp and steak so save your red herring for the welfare recipients! LOL

 

It is a piece of falling aluminum cladding acting exactly like a piece of aluminum cladding and trailing dust. The reason that the press does hot give it air time is that it is nothing significant.

 

its not alum, told you that, it has thickness, get new specs or have someone who is not blind tell you about it.

and those pieces have flames behind them, but then I suppose you cannot see that either.

 

Oh, my, were thinking "aluminum" like beer can-thickness sheets and strips?

 

no of course not, since its a tall building it needs to be at least 8" thick minimum

 

Eight inches? Did you look that up or just pull it out of your butt?

 

I was being facetious LOL

anyway

when a sheet metal tank collides with a blunt object it doubles up.





causing spray in all directions at very near the same rate as the impact.

you have been given this to demonstrate how fluid flies forward upon impact



you have been given this to show the same principles applies at mach 3 with metal on metal



as it does with fluid on metal.

you have been given this to demonstrate how the spray follows a flat surface




and can be seen in actual aircraft collisions tests where the fuel flies outward from an impact point and remains at the impact point even with a round pole, (the wtc had 16" flats for the columns) and the wings of the plane would have turned immediately into 16" wide confetti upon impact



here is yet another, a fuel ball shot out of an air canon into a screen to demonstrate how fast fuel ignites,




with very little surface area the spray still flies forward of the impact point.

and with a source of ignition (spark for instance) even though its on the opposite side of the screen ignition is nearly instant.

then we get to 175 and




and all of a sudden all the rules change.....really now.

so if we want to go with leftys theory the oxygen starved fuel ignited first ah huh

and blew out the sides before the fuel in the impact zone ignites

but then I guess there has to be fuel spray in the impact zone to ignite huh?



nothing that is supposed to happen within expected time frames as can be seen in every demonstration when a fuel tank or anything else that is or can become fluid hits a wall happens.



then we get to wtc that has all the earmarks of a brick of c4 in a 50 gallon drum.

Even for someone with no working experience in these matter what so ever, the physics knowledge required barely rates much higher than grade school science class,

everything you see was known 10 years ago, nothing new.

 

correct this: with very little surface area the spray still flies forward of the impact point.

to read this: with very little surface area the spray still flies opposite the direction of its impact.

 

Not going to work, dude. You called it right the first time and shot a toe clean off. Most of the fuel goes forward, exactly as it did in the towers.

Busted.

 

nice try at sidestepping the point.

what a silly thing to say!



its stopped and went sideways at the flat of the wall. being glass and lobbed at the wall created no pressure so you do not get the backwash.


All demonstrations prove that there had to be backwash under those conditions there are none.




you are so busted AGAIN

may as well admit those pigs you people been spinning out here no longer fly.

now begs the question what the (*)(*)(*)(*) really did happen

 

Koko actually believes he knows what the hell he's talking about.......clearly he does NOT


Silly assed GIF's and shouting 'I'm right! doesn't cut it.

 

you forgot fuzzy and youtube and all that line too! LMAO

put it this way I would not want to be boxed into the corner troughers now find themselves.

 

Koko is an 'In the hole troofer'...keeps digging,but is too stubborn to stop.

 

yeh well troughers at large seem to enjoy learning by the red face method. there is a course that needs to be run in those situations. noticed you boys no longer have anything of actual substance to throw out here. this is so lock stock and barrel that even bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and spin wont work for you anymore.

 

Koko thinks by misusing the label 'troughers' And futilely trying to turn the fact he's dug a deep,dark hole for himself back onto us.


Pathetic fail.

 

yeh but thats what you always say when you get your asses handed to you LOL

Troughers?

The whole world knows what a trougher is LOL

 

Like I said,in a hole and misusing the term..NO ONE here fits his definition

 

well truthers dont anyway.

people in support of the official story most certainly do.

How difficult can that be for you.

 

KOKO just doesn't get it...NO ONE fits his warped definition of a 'trougher'

 

I posted several examples that prove everyone who supports the official story is a trougher.

I do not support stories fairy tales and delusions, sorry, that is why you boyz call me a truther all the time.

and now days truthers have the troughers by the balls LOL




wow look at that huh!

what a demolition!

what a fireworks show! better than the 4th of july

 

Deep,dark hole,meet koko

has delusions of grandeur,and can't spell worth a crap.

 

usually the best way to see is to open your eyes.

spelling nazis arise! (the last port in the storm before the ship sinks)

 

You do hold the deluded belief that something in that dust plume is emitting, rather than reflect, light. FAIL

 

I wasnt talking about the dust, more red herrings when I told you I only dine on lobster.