Anti-mafia Judge calls for new investigation

You're exaggerating again,fraud,that and lying like a rug.

There,fixed it.

 

Not at all. They were standing with WTC7 over her left shoulder, reporting live at 5, claiming wtc7 had just fallen. Her feed was lost, and 20 minutes later, the building fell. No stretching going on there.

 

She was hardly 'standing right in front of it'

 

Bears repeating: Why can't 'truthers' tell the truth?

 

That's the detail you choose to find fault with? Well at least you don't contest they announced it fell before it fell. That's something I suppose.

 

Illustrates your stretching of the truth....And the fact they announced it before it fell is no surprise,nothing sinister about it.

 

Brown said that the building "has collapsed or is collapsing." If there was a script handed out, it would have probably been worded the same way. There had been speculation well before that that it was goig to collapse. Stanley apparently just assumed that it was down already. People make that kind of mistake in an OH (*)(*)(*)(*) scenario.

Even had they turned around and looked, they might not have known the Solomon Brothers building from the Chrysler building. Neither of them are from NYC.

 

I think it illustrates how the lies were completely scripted. Nothing "honest" about it, for sure.

 

Here is what they said about the building falling before it fell.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAlUkqlsDvs

 

Yeah ... no one ever makes a mistake on the BBC.

[video=youtube;1T0PqzkFxso]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1T0PqzkFxso[/video]

Point is ... the FDNY were predicting the collapse of WTC7 for hours before it did so. That's why they pulled all operations away from it.

 

Good point. It IS usually known ahead of time when planned demolition occurs. Thanks!

 

No one on the BBC report said it was a planned demolition.

 

They knew it was going to fall though, so they reported it early. Planned? I think so.

 

and you think no one died on 9/11.
http://thepoliticalforums.com/threa...-HOLLOW-and-EMPTY-on-9-11?p=168023#post168023

Your thoughts aren't exactly trustworthy.

 

After the towers fell,and they were able to asses things EVERYONE knew 7 would fall..

 

You believe the BBC planned 9/11?

 

You stick to your talking points no matter huh? Focus on the talking points at all cost. I thought I addressed this already? Oh yeah...I did. Doesn't fit with the talking points though. I get it.

 

EVERYONE??

Funny...I was glued to the television all day and nobody mentioned that likelihood until the BBC announced that it had already fallen some twenty minutes earlier than it actually did. "Officially" though...EVERYBODY knew. I understand. You'd think though that somebody would have announced it prior to catch it live for the "scoop". I guess the BBC was supposed to be the scoopers exclusively.

 

https://sites.google.com/site/911guide/danielnigro

 

Well, I can understand why nobody wanted to cover the collapse live. I mean, since they knew hours ahead of time. You'd think somebody would want to cover it. Quite the opposite it seems huh?

 

It was covered live. That's why there are videos and commentary during the collapse.

 

Ahhh fraud,whining because they didn't keep you better informed on 9/11 as to what was going on?

 

How come nobody told Ashley Banfield to turn off her camera and get out of there before they blew the building?

 

AFTER the fact. No news networks were hanging around with their cameras trained on WTC7 counting down, or otherwise announcing the impending collapse. AFTER. The press didn't know in advance (outside of the BBC, of course).

- - - Updated - - -

Yes...I didn't realize it was a false flag event at first. I was suckered in just like every other person. Then, the lies and inconsistencies were too apparent to ignore.

 

The really big one? It was HUGE. So big in fact, that it collapsed three buildings when I landed it.