Such anger towards Alex....he must really threaten you in some fashion. He screwing up your portfolio or something?
Actually, the fat turd is a threat to civilization as we know it. He is an operative of the Organization, with an assigned role in the RaHoWa.
Jones... I don't like him even though I frequent his site. 'Everything' is a conspiracy. He is a propagandist of the maximum degree. The overwhelming majority of his staff are walking, typing, talking cutouts of Jones. About the only redeeming factor Infowars has, to me, is when they post things that are from credible sources... not from their mouths, or their friends' mouths, but from government documents, NYT, WP, etc, that I would probably otherwise not find unless I knew what I was looking for.
Yes...Alex is overboard the way he presents things and sometimes gets too carried away, BUT, the information he presents on a daily basis is far more accurate than anything you'll find in the MSM. He overcompensates for the lack of information in the MSM, so much so that he comes off as a bit whacky. I think if I knew what he knew and had the threats to him and his family he has experienced, I'd probably be a bit whacky as well. (there's your opening "team" for your obligatory ridicule). Say what you want about him...I'll take his presentation of the facts over the lame stream any day of the week. I can filter through and re-verify the info on my own. I'd rather have information presented than not (or as was on 9/11....total LIES, BS and outright non coverage from the lame stream). What would you rather be subjected to daily? His information or the BS propagated in highly controlled places like.......(well...you know what I mean).
'Captain Accuracy' at work! [video=youtube;ZwURLwd8pEA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwURLwd8pEA[/video] Jones is a joke.
Alex is a thorn in the side to many. Specially to those advocating something other than looking for facts and discovery of actual truths. Better to dismiss him outright rather than acknowledge he has any valid information to convey.
Though I dislike Piers Morgan, when Jones was on his show, he went berserk. He mad gun owners look bad, really. His 1776 comment was not good. I say that because of the weight it carries. There are a lot of people that listen to that man. He, for some reason, was given an opportunity to stand on a soapbox and preach. I guess the old adage, "Give 'em the rope and he'll hang himself," is correct with Jones, because that's exactly what he did. He hung himself and gun owners. I seriously believe that if he were to drop the sensationalism and just go with straight facts, he'd be able to communicate his message a whole lot better -- his message would be broadcasted to more listeners because it wouldn't sound so much like loud noises anymore. I filter a lot at InfoWars. But as I said, I use what they're sourcing from the main stream/officialdom. I guess I don't need InfoWars to tell me that the world has fallen several pegs, bad things happen every day, or our security is being challenged, etc, et al. If you look hard enough, I guess, you'll find that information readily available, and from informational sources that most Americans will readily accept because they know they're credible sources.
Allegedly, he predicted 9/11, or that terrorist attacks were coming, and that he was going to blame it on the government if something happened.
I will have to do some digging, but I am sure I can find one. I don't have time right now. So...the press. Mainstream Media is absolutely ok for you, but the NIST report is not. Why? Please explain that. Especially since it's a largely held belief that the mainstream media is involved in the conspiracy. I have read the information, and I have answered this question a thousand times. I refuse to answer it again. If the previous reasons aren't good enough for you than nothing else I say will be. Purely your opinion. I don't need to have questions because I have researched the events. I know that 9/11 was used for political gain, that doesn't mean they LIHOP or MIHOP No one knows "Exactly what happened" as there were no survivors from the event. I don't believe 9/11 is more than it appears to be. It appears to be an attack on America as a result of a plan executed by radical muslims. Which is what all of the evidence points too. Yes, I got it. The President was told that an attack on America was likely, hell let's even go one step further and say that he was informed that 2 airplanes were going to fly into the WTC on Sept. 11th. What is he supposed to do, Jango? Shut down every single airport across America? Put security on each and every flight? Then what stops the terrorists from picking another day? How do you stop something like that? There is absolutely no possibly way that he had specific flight numbers to which planes were going to be taken. That's part of the point "debunkers" are trying to make, just because you're told an attack was coming doesn't mean that you can stop it. In fact, the initial plan were that it was going to be on nuclear sites. It was thrown out the window due to the damage being too excessive. See above, I would really like to know how YOU would have handled it. If there is nothing specific about the threat, what are you supposed to do? Outside of knowing a terrorist attack was coming there was no specifics. If you don't know when or where or how something is supposed to happen, how the hell do you prevent it? I wouldn't use the phrase "notoriously heinous." I don't agree with that, but apparently you find them to be the scum of the earth. Your hatred aside, I think mistakes were made, and I think hindsight is 20/20. I stand vehemently against you because you guys lie. Plain and simple. There is no other way to say it. Truthers lie, they lie some more, and the wrap it up with lying. I agree with the NIST report as it describes the technical break down of the events that day. Find me something concrete that ISN'T "A Clean Break", and we'll talk some more. I am not posting examples just for you to hand wave them away and say you don't like my sources. It's retarded. That's my point, you guys point out little, piddly (*)(*)(*)(*) as GIGANTIC problems from that day. Like there aren't supposed to be oddities, or things that seem really strange when 4 airliners crash into buildings and a field. Sometimes things that look like coincidences are just that, coincidences. An unanswered coincidence is something that happens where this no answer as to why it happens. There will always be someone who can break it down to technicalities. Like why some body parts can't be found from the WTC\Pentagon plane crashed, but passports\papers\plane seats all make it through with no issue. Just...oddities. I was more referring to the evolutionary process that created us as humans. I don't believe in fate though, I control my life. No one else.
The thing is, how accurate is a CIA analyst? Prognostications are a difficult thing. Jones is mostly bad at it because he is so sensational, and has cried wolf so many times that his word is devalued. World War III is a likely thing. Similarly, I've thought that Iran would smuggle a dirty bomb in through the Mexican border... They are coming after our guns.
AJ's rants about FEMA camps and how the military is being trained to take your guns away are amusing. He has shown videos of a place where I have actually worked, training soldiers in civil affairs before deployment to Iraq and shrieked about how this was part of some new plan to disarm us all. Actually, the Army had been doing that same thing on Ft Lewis for some 80 years that I know of. You (*)(*)(*)(*)ed better know how to secure a village before you invade and occupy a country. Jones really has no education to qualify him to address most of the crap he goes on about.
His prediction of 9/11 (circa July, 2001) consisted of him stating that the US would suffer a terrorist attack, and bin Laden or Hussein would be blamed. He gave no details, dates or locations. He didn't even say 'soon'. Jones is another 'free flowing fountain of truth' in exactly the same way Phil over at letsroll is.
Jones handled himself very poorly on CNN there, I agree. He should have taken the opportunity to present himself a bin a bit better light but, it was what it was. I agree with filtering his information as well. I realize he isn't always correct, BUT, he OFTEN is. Americans don't react to logic and reason. They react to sensationalism and extremes. Maybe that's what he was thinking, I don't know. The man is spot on accurate on a great many things overall though, IMO. He conveys a lot of good information when hardly anyone else does and while everybody else seemingly has their heads buried deep in the sand. What is credible these days? From whom? Certainly not our MSM, and certainly not in online forums where shills like to play. He is what he is and I applaud his efforts.
Funny how this whole gun thing is taking center stage currently though, don't you think? Perhaps he was on to something? Perhaps the establishment fears the society they have created and want guns confiscated ASAP from as many people as they can in the quickest amount of time that they can? Kooks with guns have always been around. Suddenly, they're of paramount importance. Coincidence with the instability and dissatisfaction of the general public as a whole today? I think not.
Maybe because 20 children were murdered? That MAY have something to do with it. My favorite part about the whole gun talk is that gun enthusiasts actually think that if the government wants to attack us that an AR-15 will stop them. Yeah...that'll happen. Nevermind the fact they have helicopter strikes, drone attacks, and tanks. You standing in your window "pew pewing" with your AR-15 is REALLY going to keep them out.
That's kind of what I was getting at. We shouldn't have fear of our own government attacking us, because the military is comprised of people with dignity, respect, and honor. Under no circumstances would they attack their fellow citizens. I was just speaking to the ridiculousness of thinking the guns available to the public would be able to fend off a government attack. At the time the second amendment was created we were all on a level playing field (musket to musket). At this point it's a ridiculous theory.
Maybe the spree killers are actually being put up to it by the same people who plant Da Twoof. They want the government to crack down on gun owners, then they can stir up the RaHoWa.
Well since no AR-15 was used, I find it strange that tidbit was passed off initially. Sounds like people reporting on buildings haven already fallen while they're standing directly in front of them well before they fell..WHOOPS! I question the details of the incident...not necessarily the incident itself. Gun kooks have always been here...all of a sudden, they're of paramount importance. Smells fishy to me.
Aaron Brownb is from Seattle, Jane Stanley is from the UK. They might know the Chrysler Building from the Empire State building. Notice that Brown said "Has collapsed or is collapsing." In an OH (*)(*)(*)(*) scenario, anyu old soldier can tell you, even critical informatin is not going to be correctly transmitted in real time with any dgree of accuracy. Round about way of saying that those who think that Stanley and Brown are holding the smoking guns, do not understand guns..
Yes...they were reading from their advanced script, reporting on WTC7 falling before it fell, while standing directly in front of it at least 20 minutes prior. Musta been a mistake huh?
