BTW, I see patriot911 tagged out, and it looks like we have the Ultimate 9-11 liar, tag teaming with Hulk propaganda in a tag match!
And what makes you right? Correct? And if that's why you come here, that's a stupid online existence. Because in your mind, you're just arguing with "stupid truthers". So also in your mind, you're supposedly winning arguments against "stupid truthers". You're claim to online fame is being in the same ugly room with truthers. What does that really say about you? And you volunteered for this. And enjoy this. Okay.
You call him anti-Semitic, hand wave his posts, "TL-DR", etc. You've argued very little of substance to counter his claims. Though I wish he'd source his stuff more, I wish you'd source something more than NIST or the Commission Report.
Nice edit in Fang. So you do support him because you do it yourself, just not as much, and much sneakier about it. Are you conservative too? A Republican? I suspect that Hannibal is as well.
Do a Google search on "Jango" and you'll find he's a clown. http://jangoedwards.net/workshops/clown-front/
Yuck. I'm afraid of clowns, so impossible. The only 'Jango's that match me are here and Let's Roll. How many places does or has Patriot911 frequented?
Who cares? Get over the personal attacks and debate the facts. You have questions posted to you that you haven't answered.
What a load of tripe. Why is it that truthers have to invent a fiction to explain facts they don't understand? Who said anything about Political Forum being my "claim to online fame." Did you stalk me on google too? Do you realize how stupid this claim is?
First off, I've never been "board" because I'm able to spell. I post on 9/11 because the subject interests me. I argue with "stupid truthers" because it's entertaining for me, and I have downtime at work that I like to fill with posting. I find it amazing that in the face of overwhelming evidence that individuals can find slight discrepancies and then throw the entire body of work away. Jango saying he'd like me to source information other than NIST and 9/11 commission (although I've never once linked to the 9/11 commission report) is something I consider ludicrous. I think it's irrational to even entertain the idea that SO many people would have to be in on the conspiracy it's not even practical. Guy_fawkes_mask _2.0, forgot the name and don't care to research it, states that Hulston is well sourced and well documented, then I discard it. Hulston uses nothing but truther sources. Both of you have commented that I've said, "tl;dr", which is true, I've also said "tl; Anti-Semite", because that's what it is. You guys can defend the posting of garbage like that, and that's totally fine. I will not read information degrading Jewish people because of their religion. I will not condone drawing invisible lines to people because of some childish, bias outlook to life. The sad thing is, he openly admits it. At this point, truthers have everyone in on it, and it makes them look completely stupid. In order to pull off this conspiracy they have: A demolition crew, people flying the aircraft, the passengers, the thousands of scientists that did the reports at the NIST, the 9/11 commission report, police officers, fire department, medical response teams, most of the government, other countries scientists, other countries financial advisers, structural engineers around the globe, Al Qaeda, Bin Laden, KSM, all the terrorists, all of the social and main stream media, and on, and on and one. None of that can be contested, in order for the conspiracy to be pulled off all of those people would need to be involved. If nothing else, if there were no other evidence, that should be enough. It is just stupid to think that not one individual, or group of individuals, wouldn't come together in the face of the danger of coming out to the media and government and explain what happened. In closing, believe whatever you want, and believe in whatever story you need to in order to sleep at night. I take pride in knowing the truth, and I will continue to post in whatever section of any boards I (*)(*)(*)(*) well please. I refuse to learn more about politics because I don't care about them in the slightest bit, and despite 9/11 being used, after the fact, for political gains is irrelevant to me. Politics didn't cause 9/11.
"Jango saying he'd like me to source information other than NIST and 9/11 commission (although I've never once linked to the 9/11 commission report) is something I consider ludicrous." Why? Why is it ludicrous?
Because it's the largest, most accurate body of work that describes the events of 9/11. It holds as many possible answers to the most destructive terrorist attack, when it comes to science, than anything else. That would be like someone saying, "Tell me all about catholic religion, but don't quote the bible." The NIST report clarifies what happened that day, as best a body of work possibly can. If you'd like, we can hold each other to the same precedence. From now on, you can no longer use any truther sites. Let's do that, and we can go back and forth all day. You can use no truther sites at all to make your points, it has to be proven by an independent group of people that have no interest, either way, in 9/11. What else would you like me to use? I use JREF quite a bit as well, because you'll see the threads there are sourced by the posters. No offense against PoliticalForum but the same rules don't apply there. I post a lot less there, as I find it hard to compete with the knowledge that is there, I find myself reading a lot of information. Once again, believe whatever you need to believe about 9/11. I see the information. I've seen pilots for 9/11 truth debunked, I've seen loose changed thoroughly debunked, their second movie- thoroughly debunked, the Harrit et. al. study - debunked, and I've seen the thermite theory debunked. I don't have questions anymore, that's why I don't ask questions here. The questions that truthers bring up are piddly little weird inconsistencies. Reports from confused news companies 2 days after the attacks, anti-semite garbage about what Jews worked where, the retardation that is the "pull it" theory, and all the other little things. Truthers go in expecting that everything is going to be laid out in a neat perfect little line for them to understand. Yet, they don't realize that if it was laid out perfectly from end to end it would be more suspicious than it is now. I expect there to be unanswered coincidences, that's life. You don't even realize how many coincidences had to happen for you and I to be typing here.
Were people not ignorant, Alex Jones would get slapped every time he opened his filthy pie hole Only idiot believe what that piece of crap sells. Only idiots trust a piece of crap like Chris Bollyn, the Nazi idiot who wants to try WWII EINMAL WIEDER! The TM is proof that there are ignorant people. It would have died out at once under a tsunami of laughter at the pathetic twits. - - - Updated - - - You don't get to do that. You need to show some evidence. You lack credentials to do so. You don't even know the difference between thermite and paint.
You'd like inquisitive minds to believe that what some have identified as thermite is only paint...I do understand.
The reason we would like inquisitive minds to believe it is because that's what the scientific evidence proves. There is no evidence saying thermite was used, and there is a ton of evidence saying it was paint.
It looks like paint, it contains everything that paint is supposed to contain, it behaves like paint when you heat it. It contains stuff that is not supposed to be in thermite. It's (*)(*)(*)(*)ing PAINT.
I don't use truther sites. I don't recall ever posting a truther source before. Unless you can find a time where I did... Straight sources would be nice. New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, The Guardian, Reuters, The Telegraph, BBC, Detroit Free Press, LA Times, Chicago Tribune -- declassified/FOIA/Wikileaks documentation -- credible primary sources that can be accessed online. Things like that. The only one you haven't seen debunked is "A Clean Break". Hell, you won't even touch it. Well, you've said that you've read the information. But I cannot verify that. You should have questions. The fact that you say "A Clean Break" is nothing is horrible. It is as though you don't ever want to recognize that 9/11 is more than it appears to be. And as if you know exactly what happened. As though you have knowledge of all the words on the 40 Presidential Daily Briefs President Bush received prior to 9/11. Or the PDB that President Clinton received warning him of Osama bin Laden, or heck, just Arab Radicalism. Yet, you recognize the sometimes heinousness of government, but look blindly to them to tell you that "Well, yes, we screwed up, but things just weren't that specific for us to overcome the threat." As if that condones anything, and secondly, if you know that government lies, and if you know now that Bush's administration is notoriously heinous, then why is it that you stand against us so vehemently when clearly, suspicion is a normal feeling to have about said administration? It depends on the inconsistency, and who is involved, I guess, before it arouses suspicion, don't you think? Largely, I would need examples to either agree or disagree with you. Who's suggesting such a thing? Perfection? Surely I haven't. What's an 'unanswered coincidence'? And is it coincidence that we're communicating, or is it something else maybe, fate perhaps?
