Are Scantly Dressed Women Sending The Wrong Message?

Your interpretation of people's post isn't taken serious. You're a partisan bomb thrower, and that's all your post are treated as. Grow up.

 

You probably haven't met one or dealt with one. Assuming you did, we can make the assumption that you towed the Corporate Line. You are what they'd call a "beta male", or more respectfully: A yes man. And sure enough, they are going to swallow you up. After all, they're getting everything they want: Financial assistance, bodily pleasure and NONE of the perceived "drawbacks" of an actual relationship.

At the end, if you actually go far with such a person and receive the reprecussions(which is either a divorce, or one of these aforementioned Court cases), you're going to look back at my words prophetically and say "Damn, should've listened to AN when I had the chance." They're not dating quality. It's like putting an investment in a broke company with shady dealers who tell you that "this time, the investment will pay off".

No, it won't.

 

Here you are saying that no one justifies rape and then spend the rest of your post doing just that. Afterall it is the woman's fault and it really wasn't rape, she just regrets having had sex with you.

 

Spending time at a PUA site?

Apparently they haven"t been teaching you well if you're so concerned about being accused of rape, You must know everything about women being tne great Alpha male that you are. Excuse me while i roll around and laugh for awhile.

 

...........-_-. Did you really interpret my post like that? I think some definitions are in order:

an acceptable reason for doing something : something that justifies an action

Going by the actual definition of the word, can anyone really read my post and state that I gave an "acceptable reason" for rape? No, I made a statement. That Rape is the most over-charged, and most accused crime in America. And it's the ONLY crime that save for the rape kit, has no physical evidence whatsoever.

Thus why the "Court of Public opinion" sentences those charged with rape in the first place. It's no longer enough to be guilty in the court of law in Today's America. Rape is the dreaded four-letter word you don't want to hear. You'd rather be accused of murder. Because unless your OJ Simpson if you're vindicated in court you'll likely be able to rebuild your life.

Think about that folks: It's more possible to rebuild your life accused of being a murderer, then it is as a rapist. So while the Liberals wanna circle around and knee-jerk to make themselves feel better, the reality is very different: Rape is OVER-persecuted in America, not underpersecuted. There's no "Rape Culture". There is however, and always has been: A court culture in the US.

That Court Culture, is now a financial monster eating away at any man who happens to make the mistake of getting close to a woman vindictive enough, selfish enough and manipulative enough to screw you over.

And hey, I wish "regret sex" weren't a thing too but they openly admitted to it on MSNBC: Yeah, we regretted it and so we called it "rape" to feel better about ourselves. A woman can report anything as a woman, with almost no consequences. It's a rare day when pigs fly when the police actually go after a "false police report" for a woman.

A woman is more dangerous to a man, than anything else in this world not named a terminal disease. She's your greatest risk, your biggest investment and your highest chance of failure. Choose wisely.

 

I still can not relate to your concerns. First of all you are still blaming women for rape. Secondly I am well into my fifties and have spent time with so many different women that I've long lost count. Never, ever has rape come up. i've never worried about it.

 

Obviously. Conservative types like to wallow in what they believe to be true. Being faced with other points of view and facing reality doesn't sit well.

 

Who cares about message? I like looking at scantily clad women. Good looking, of course. Those that look like Hillary.....just cover up, ladies.

 

YES, the OP is trying to justify rape by blaming the victim.


Yes, it may be a dumb decision just like the billions of bad decisions men make, but the crime is on the perpetrator always...and trying to blame women for rape is a disease...

 

Justifying rape by blaming the victimand feminism....everyone and anyone but the rapist.....


A. You believe women should never wear high heels or they are responsible for being raped.

B. You must believe women should never wear dresses because "access" is much easier...that's just ASKING FOR IT...Right???!!!

Actually, I agree women should never wear dresses , they're sexist and impractical.

C. HOW EXACTLY does a 5 year old or an 86 year old dress "wrong" to bring on their rape??


How did those alter boys who were raped by Non-feminist Christian priests dress? Were they dressed provocatively? Did THEY ask for it??

 

Is the guy in your photo asking for it? According to you he is.......if he gets raped making access easier is he also responsible for his own rape??

 

I posted the definition for you, and you still claim that I'm "blaming" women for rape. I'll try to dumb it down even further: I'm not blaming anyone for rape, I'm pointing out that there's a tremendous amount of fraud with rape charges, like that RAINN organization for starters that wants to cry out "Every 30 minutes or so, a woman's raped" which is simply not factual, or anywhere close to factual.

If you heard from organizations like that, you'd think we're war torn Africa. No, here's the grim reality: In a country of over 300 million inhabitants, you might have let's say 10,000 rape cases a year. A lot to be sure right, but as a percentage of the general population? So small as to be remote.

And like I said: It's the only crime where the burden of proof is NOT required for a conviction. Literally. We've seen so many famous examples that I'm not even surprised anymore. So of those 10,000 cases, we can safely assume as many as 100(and this is the conservative estimate from me) is fraudulent. The number could be way higher.

Given those fraudulent cases, you wanna cry "rape culture". No, we have a Court culture. In the US alone, suing costs and makes millions. There's nothing more lucrative than being a prosecutor or a defense attorney. After the Court case, they shake hands at the money they got from the State.

Such is "justice". So, no, I'm not blaming anyone for rape. I'm dismissing it altogether as a nonexistent problem. You wanna see your problem? Go to the war lording countries. There you'll see ACTUAL rape, in far greater numbers than in the US.

 

lol good point

 

Another serious problem those who join the feminist religion is cognitive dissonance.

When faced with any criticism or reasonable arguments the feminist excuse for a brain shuts down and ignores what was said and manufactures dishonest claims which twist and pervert the reasonable arguments of others.

You just proved that point.

In no way shape or form did I imply or say or hint at what you just lied about me saying in cowardly fashion.

Argue what I said do not argue what you lie about me saying

 

Complete dishonesty. Since what I said was reasonable and accurate but you do not like it you perverted and twisted what I stated. I clearly blamed the criminal.

I stated somethings makes it easier for the criminal.

Two different things no matter how much you whine and scream that it means something else.

 

No thug is a racist term. BLM told us it is. You are a racist. Rape is mostly about power. As in, "I'm a powerful man and I am taking what I want."

 

Thug is a racial neutral term. BLM is irrelevant.

Rape is often about power often it is about wanting sex not caring about consent.

 

for everyone to be happy/lucky, there has to be someone who is miserable/unlucky. everyone cannot be lucky because luckiness is judged on success and success can only be judged against failure. your search for happiness is a selfish goal.

- - - Updated - - -

so this is a common theme you encounter in your life? association?

 

Western culture isn't depraved, or at least dressing scantily isn't an example of depravity. How you dress doesn't determine your promiscuity. It's unwise to judge a book by its cover, although it certainly can be confusing. Making judgments is human nature, but acting on and accepting those judgments with knowledge limited only to outward appearance is done at risk.

 

mini skirt. leggins. short shorts. cleavage out. those sort of things.

 

a mini-skirt justifies rape?

- - - Updated - - -

I can only speak for myself, but my happiness doesn't depend on the lives or successes of others.

- - - Updated - - -

so everything that happens, is God's will?

 

first, it's scantily

second- this thread is useless without pictures

 

I'm just about super late in this thread
Just want to clarify though that part in red though....

1. Have you thought about what the fat ugly pig is attracted to?
2. What if your attire attracts fat ugly pigs?
3. Are you so pompous that you think everybody except fat ugly pigs should be allowed to approach you?
4. At any point in time did you make consideration for the reactions that your attire might incite from the public?

Not trying to make a point just yet... just need to ascertain a baseline or a mindset if you will.

 

Not common but it happens. Other people see the same thing, which is why this is a general topic of conversation in the first place.

 

Mixing large amounts of alcohol and scantily dressed women is a recipe for chaos isn't it