yes, we learn from those that went before us had Trump not changed the rules, they would still be alive Trump lied, people died
~ That is the "Cuomo COVID Incubator" strategy to build herd immunity . DeBl@sio painted big letters on the sidewalk in New York City to celebrate the success. Brilliant !
I am in what I like to call "late middle age." It isn't lying or downplaying to point out the fact, inconvenient for some folks, that most of the people dying are older or have heart problems or something else going on. Look it up. Study after study has confirmed that. And if that fact stops some of the hysteria or makes some people feel better, then good for Trump. The evidence confirms it whether you like it or not. The only issue I have with "protecting the vulnerable" is that I think, no matter how old, people should be treated with dignity and respect and, to me, that means even the elderly should have a choice in how they want to live. In many cases, protecting them means they will never see their families again and will die surrounded by strangers. I wonder how many would choose to live and die like that in return for living a few more years isolated.
Yea...bad move. Did anyone get infected? TRUMP just admitted that he was positive for Covid when he had that fund raiser in New Jersey and MAY have been infected when he debated Biden .
[ https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...&ved=0ahUKEwi-g8HO4bjsAhXEl3IEHXc-AP8Q4dUDCA0 OK right, he didn't say EXACTLY that, and he didn't' pull some old guy out of the crowd and strangle him either, but besides doing that I don't know how much clearer he can be. If you're old, or overweight, or have diabetes or any other chronic condition you've just been sacrificed to make a higher stock market. Go ahead vote for the guy who wants to kill you if you're not a perfect specimen of youthful health
He wasn't saying that they don't matter. If this thing killed on average 40 year olds like the Swine Flu, and it was just as contagious as COVID, then do you REALLY think that it would be treated with no more severity than COVID? Throughout history, do you suppose that a fair amount of people may have been saved from dying from the flu if only there had been a lockdown?
Possibly and probably, it depends on the Flu. He was indeed saying that and I resent it. 70 is the new 50. We are not all just sitting at the nursing home and waiting to die. Are you talking of the so called "Spanish" Flu, or something else? As I understand it CORVID is not a flu. It comes from the same family of diseases that flus are a subset of, but it is not one of them
Just the normal seasonal flu. Think of how many lives could have been saved if only we had adopted some of the restrictions that we have adopted for COVID. Why didn't we? Yeah, but I've described a fictional virus which is far more serious: A virus which kills on average 40 year olds (like Swine flu) but just as contagious as coronavirus. Do you think that it would be more serious?
Well, hell, think if this was Ebola And I think you're describing the Spanish Flu of 1918. Millions died from that both here and abroad and nothing was done, though it was urged, Very little was known about it back then. Conservative mythology notwithstanding this is about 10x more deadly than the flu, the flu kills really FAR fewer people than it infects, but still some because it infects so many. It's possible we should lockdown for the flu. Or let's go the other way. We spend literally trillions and suffer lots of inconvenience besides for our sewers. That saves us from cholera but hey, if you can survive two weeks of explosive diarrhea I think you have the "herd immunity" there. Think of the Army we could buy if we weren't spending it all on sewers.
So do you think that a virus which kills on average 40 year olds with the same death rate and contagiousness as coronavirus would be more serious than coronavirus?