"Incivility" in Godless Sweden has come (as OD said it would!)

That seems to be what most christians, especially if they be RW in the USA, want. A return to the good ole days, but they are only good ole days if you were a white american male with a job. And the wife was a good little woman whose purpose was to be barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen. Just what every human wants.

 

While none of it has to do with God or Godlessness. So you OP is proven false by you.

 

Many women are waking up to the reality of liberalism, secularism, zionism, and realizing they don't want to chase a dollar and work for a USUALLY MALE boss as career business women.

They are 40 year old promiscuous women, wrinkled, old, haggard, worked hard and long, CHILDLESS.

CHILDLESS.

Feminists are waking up to reality. They threw their lives away on zionist aspirations, chasing meaningless dollars and a meaningless lives, when other women intentionally or unintentionally made the better decision, by having children at 20 or earlier.

Mothers are important by virtue of being a mother. Liberals cannot deal with the fact. That's why liberals wrongly throw money at welfare moms and welfare babies.

More and more women are waking up to the fact that being a pregnant, housewife, taking care of a GOOD MAN, is one of the best lives to live, in service of a man.

 

Excuse me. You have me on ignore. I'd like to keep it that way.

 

I take that as a "No".

 

wrong post.

 

where do you dig up this tripe?

 

Wrong on both accounts. One was already explained (calling you out) and the other is irrelevant because calling you out does have something to do with the thread and the thread content.

 

It must have been His emotions that made Jesus overturn the tables of the money-changers in the temple, so I suppose He does not expect utter meekness of us when the Lord’s name is abused.
Ironically the rest of your post displays that ‘intolerance’ of other Christians beliefs is not first and furthermost my problem, but yours. Grace is neither conservative or liberal. The complete lack of grace in your posts here however shows that you put your political ideology above the teachings of Christ.

Guess you are not familiar with the difference between knowing and believing. I believe it is never too late to accept the grace God shows us in Christ, not even after death. I also believe that Jesus did not die in vain, but will be ultimately victorious in the task He set Himself: to save the world (John 3:17). These beliefs have ample scriptural backing, that I have repeatedly given in the best tradition of “Sola Scriptura”, and I remember you once followed my reasoning at least to the extend of agreeing that it befits a Christian to hope for everybody’s salvation rather than dwelling in uncharitable fantasies about other people roasting in hell. Until judgement day I strongly suggest you first and furthermost occupy yourself with your very own salvation, unless you want to see a Swedish harlot enter the Kingdom of God before you. (Matthew 21:28-32)

From my point of view you did nothing but preaching a gospel other than that that’s to be found in the New Testament in this thread. May the Lord have mercy on your soul!

I guess by “European social structure” you mean the fact that in Europe it is – at least theoretically – still a value to look out for the weakest in society rather than letting each fend for themselves and letting those who can’t rot on the street. I’d say that such a value is not “Godless” at all but in the best tradition of both the New and Old Testament:
“Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.” ( Isaiah 1:17). Which is exactly what you are not doing when you point a condemning finger at those who riot in Sweden because they’ve been forgotten and oppressed.

As for the Anti-Christ: you can find Him at work among those whose neoliberal ideology of greed you have fallen prey to. Again: may the Lord have mercy on your soul!

 

Right here on PF and other political forums just like this. And the OPer point to the 1950s as how we should have every country be just like the US was back then.

 

Isn't it odd how few people agree with your opinions when they are that the semantics are more important than every single aspect of the actual debate at hand?

 

your argument is mostly outdated and archaic. I've not seen such posts in here. And now, every socialist/communistic country thinks we should be more like them because they cannot make decisions in their pitiful little lives without consent from said tyrants. After so many generations have passed, they still don't realize they are slaves whose soul purpose in life is to feed and cloth the government. They are so steeped in the slave-traditions, they have absolutely no concept about Liberty or Rights.

 

Yes it is kind of 'odd' especially considering that most of the folk on this forum seem to have a desire to impress others with their pseudo intellect and at the same time take offense to the use of semantics which is required in any communications with others.

 

It doesn't seem to be what most Christians in Sweden want:

From the Church of Sweden's website: "The Church of Sweden works towards achieving global fairness and justice and therefore puts the rights of poor countries and vulnerable groups in the spotlight. This is a prerequisite for creating sustainable development for everyone." http://www.svenskakyrkan.se/default.aspx?id=996676

 

I know not what you speak of.

 

your BS post............Remember this?

 

Yes, what about it. Right in this very thread, the OPer made the statement, paraphrasing, we should return to the 1950s lifestyle, as that was the best the USA has ever been and used Godlessness as a reason we aren't in the 1950s anymore. Seems recent as opposed to archaic.

 

link to said post...........no need to copy and paste the post, the link will do just fine

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/relig...has-come-od-said-would-11.html#post1062676556
This is only my response to anothers post who responded to the OPer about how great america was back in the 1950s.
I'm not going through the thread to find the post it pertains to. I read it earlier today, so it must be within the 1st few pages and then there were many responses about how great it was, but only if white and male. Not so great for all others.
Don't jump in the end of a thread and make statements if you haven't read the thread.

 

.....of course not..............I perused this and found that while such things were discussed, I found no posts that denigrated todays life as compared to less current times. Some indicated they thought times were different but I cannot help but agree A great many things have changed in the past 60 years. So what? Arguing with the obvious is a waste of energy......

 

Only in regard to sexual morality...

Even the Separate but equal" civil culture was better then, in regard to the Black family which Welfare and single mother encouragements have decimated.

If we COULD go back to 1960, and think of the families and the coming child abuse which the liberal feminized sexual revolution led into this present terrible environment for raising kids, we might have done much better to have focused on the Minimum Wage and have paid unskilled workers, particularly in the Black community a livable wage which would have allowed the support of a family.
Instead of giving women money to stay single and have kids, money in the Blackman's pay check would have trickled down as the black girls married them.

 

I hope you are correct that women are waking up.

The ruler for that change will be reduction in the 1.5 million illegitimate babies and a rise in the number of people marrying before age 20.

Zionism first introduced these ideas in a world where Arabia was pagan and promiscuous.
It has been Zionism that has taught the Gentiles the world over to be sexually prudent and to see marriage as sacred.

 

Zech. 13:1 In that day there shall be a fountain opened, (the New Testament i.e.; the holy comforter), to the house of David,(i.e.; Christianity), and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem,(those who say they are Jews but are not: [Rev 3:9]), for sin and for uncleanness.


Zech. 13:2 And it shall come to pass in that day, (380 AD, when Emperor Theodosius I enacted a law establishing Catholic Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire and ordering others to be called heretics), saith the LORD of hosts, that I will cut off the names of the idols out of the land, and (Paganism) shall no more be remembered: and also I will cause the prophets, (especially of Astrology), and the unclean spirit(of Libidinal sexual excesses) to pass out of the land.


The 1000 year kingdom when only Jesus reigned as a god over all the previous pagan world of the Roman Empire would be an example of setting aside sexually promiscuous cultures for a better way:



Rev. 20:4 And I saw thrones (of Universal Christian authority) and they, (the 144,000 monks of Catholic monasticism: [Rev14:4]), sat upon them, (Christianity mandated as the ONLY legal religion in the Empire, in 380AD), and (theocratic) judgment was given unto them (in the days of Catholic Monasticism): and I saw the souls, (the spirit-like psyches or thinking) of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the (one) word of God, (Truth), and which had not worshipped (by participation in the paganistic practices and sexual excesses fueling) the beast (of the revival of that Roman Culture including the economic system which had been based upon selfish self-interest), neither his image (on his coinage), neither had received his mark (of ledgered accounts recorded) upon their foreheads, or in (wages in) their hands; and they, (the monks), lived (in their Monasteries after the appearance of the Gospels in 54AD)...
.... and (they) reigned (in Monasticism) with Christ a thousand years, (from 54 AD upon the appearance of the Holy Comforter, until 1054 AD with the first Schism of Greek Orthodoxy).

 

Except that...

.... open homosexuality always accompanies the straight promiscuity which produces the single mothers and the violence prone children they raise fatherless.

 

Except that …

... you are talking out of your arse here from start to finish. The sickening homophobia, sexism and racism you display in your posts aside: the black communities, that you associate with promiscuity, broken families, single-mothers, etc., happen to have a more negative attitude towards homosexuality than the average white population. (https://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/glbss/PDFS/BlackMenMasculinity.pdf) Unfortunately the same holds true for immigrants living in Europe. The last place where you’d want to be openly homosexual in Europe would be a place like Husby or Clichy-sous-Bois. To connect the violent youth-riots there with “open homosexuality” is plainly daft.