It was a bomb, not a second plane, who said a second plane...I saw it no second plane!

LMAO
Ah yes.....speaking of batshit thrown at a wall, cutters dont leave burn marks.
Heres some more!

 

If there are any actually interested viewers, which seems a stretch, they would be wondering what world of batshit do the "evil-perps" set off a completely unnecessary invisibly-placed "cutter charge", put in place by psychopathic demolition experts, magically employed with incredibly free access to areas of the building. However, most, if not all of the viewers will understand that the impact actually caused a massive shock wave and simply loosened the cladding at the corner.

What It Felt Like to Be Inside the WTC During the 9/11 Attacks | Observer
"I returned to my office and decided to call my mother. A few seconds after hanging up the phone at 9:03 a.m., I felt a violent jolt, and then a falling sensation. I remember thinking that the building was coming down and it was the end. The impact caused the building to sway heavily. It was actually designed to sway to a certain degree as the towers have to withstand high winds on a regular basis, but this was far beyond anything I’d ever felt before."

That old adage has never seemed more true: "You cannot reason somebody out of a position they did not reason themselves into".

 

yea they do. A quick YouTube search proves you wrong but keep slinging the **** …

 

dont just talk about it do it LOL
(good luck)

 

forensic evidence, the 1000 pound gorilla could care less about drama scripts

 

Clearly, irrefutably, obvious the building fascia and columns have been pushed inwards.
Clearly, irrefutably, obvious 0.85 tons of TNT shook the building and dislodged an end panel. Whoopie-do.

As I said: "You cannot reason somebody out of a position they did not reason themselves into".

 

Excellent video. And the authors concise presentation and break-down of just how the U.S. government sacrificed about 3000 people on 9/11/01 was totally FAKED with CGI plane attacks in order to scapegoat a religion. Of course this was done to cover up "their mass murdering" of their own civilians in order to get their ORWELLIAN agenda through.

 

So you posted a couple of days ago that it was a 757. I thought you had just mistyped, clearly your research skills are a little on the poor side. It was a 767 on both towers.

Wow that sounds like ludicrous bare assertion.

 

cancel, looks like MIT got it wrong, need to further review.

 

How about you go review what frickin' plane it was? That's twice. It's fairly unlikely that MIT are wrong and you have discovered this, when you can't even get one simple fact correct.

 

would it be a huge surprise if you were to discover that 700 series boeings all have tails?



Check it out! It has a tail!

 

Viewers, we're making progress! He's got the right base number now. Not the 300 variation though. But he's also discovered it has a tail.

 

Im so glad you agree that the 700 series all have tails




Think about it planers, the only way there can be no tail damage is if there was NO PLANE!

I like that pic, it has the no walkway painted on the wings that if you step ouside that grey boundary you will put your foot through the wing (of these invincible airplanes) because its so thin and flimsy.

 

Oh wait there is one other way! Im so brilliant! Boeing forgot to put the tail on the plane! Eureka thats it!

Now any good forensics investigator would see that right? Thats why everyone has been talking about it and NIST put it in nstar and its in the 911 commission report!

Everyone knows about this, common knowledge RIGHT?

 

How very deceptive, who would have thought it. QuIte clearly there's plenty of damage in that tail section area, so you dishonestly use a picture with smoke covering parts of the entrance hole.
Seriously pathetic.

Meanwhile it's game over for this thread, the columns are pushed INWARDS!

 

Hahaha!

That drawing is a stick drawing drawn over the top of an actual 767 then scaled 'exactly' to the proper dimensions with respect to the building and placed over the top of the hole.

I remeasured the dimensions and they are bang on.

The burn mark that was caused by fire that you are trying to claim is tail impact is 11ft to far to the left of where an 'actual' tail 'had' to hit, and if there was an 'actual' plane a tail mark 'had' to be 15ft longer vertically to match a 'REAL' 767!

Its game on for no-planers!

Nothing themate and kickers couldnt 'easily' produce!

I already pointed out that the columns you claim are pushed in are in fact squished from both sides, mostly from the left side and that is not pushed in in the same sense as a plane wing bending them inward by impact.

Many of those columns are blown apart and look exactly like the exploding cigar cartoons we seen as kids!

They do not look anything remotely like a sheared off column, see the pentagon poles.

Sorry man, no tail damage no plane.



/planers!

 

But then you dishonestly applied it to a smoke filled picture. Besides we've seen the accuracy of your "measurements" with your drawn lines on the plane crash video.

Nope. Clearly the big section is bang in the middle and tilted. More importantly though it's MISSING!

Haha, no seriously. You said they were leaning, then you said they were sideways now its the magic-cutters placed by the invisible team of magically-employed psychopathic demolition experts, disguised as elevator workers.

Bent inwards, strangely that's what columns do when they are bent, INWARDS.

Well just under a ton of kinetic force would do that. Try not to hark back too much to your childhood, science is fun when you get stuck in to it.

 

On the Main picture I posted, you can see on the bottom left (orange ball of fire) the extent of the wing damage to the building. That is just over 3 columns to the left of a "whiter" column, clearly visible on the gif in post #88. However, the wing on that gif only extends to 2 columns past it - it's not in the right place! Clearly on the fuller picture is damage right in the center, consistent with a tail fin.

GOING INWARDS!

 

The irrefutable CGI video evidence of "no" nose cone damage proves 100 percent that it was a FAKED plane strike and explosives were used to bring down not only WTC 1 and 2, but WTC 7 too.

The government/corporations here in the U.S. (and globally) are corrupt and full of mass murderers and psychopaths who will do anything for money, power, and to fulfill their Orwellian agenda.

FACT!

 

If, astonishingly, there are new people to this subject who are perched on the fence for this idiotic claim, this blog tears it to pieces: http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.com

It's Not the Nose of the Plane

If the CGI "no-plane theory" is correct and it's the nose of a computer generated plane animation that can be seen exiting the opposite side of the tower in the FOX Chopper footage, then why doesn't the nose hold it's shape? The alleged nose can clearly be seen morphing and expanding as it exits. An animated plane graphic would not do that, especially if it was an editing blunder that was never intended to be seen.
Below: The exiting "nose" is compared with the plane's nose prior to impact.



See how it was done:




















So this supposed batshit-claimed mistake appeared on multiple versions of the impact, multiple videos and impossibly supposedly overplayed on footage where the object to be composited was moving with the frame!

 

What is scifi for 100! lol

Nope, one video inserted into a model viewed ad infinitum from any angle, as you already admitted is how it works.

Watch ace baker if you have any questions, he really teaches it well.

 

Oh there are tonz more!
Several more physical impossibilities that soooooo many people either dont know about, overlook, or cognitive dissonance sends them into deep denial as we see happen in these threads every time their backs are against the wall with a hard material evidence ko punch LOL

Just for shits n giggles, the fire swallowing up the faked nose, fire billows and expands, it does not contract, this is due to the heat of course. Much of the photoshopping they have done is so poorly done its an insult to the intelligence of most physicists. Actually I had much of this material way back in high school lol

 

Ignoring the pure comedic noise:
http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.com/2016/06/aircraft-parts-and-debris-found-near.html
Aircraft Parts and Debris Found Near the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001



Piece of fuselage from AA11


Fuselage from AA11









Airplane seat cushion.





Wheel from Flight AA11 embedded in column panel on the street south of WTC1.












Piece of landing gear from UA 175.

 

WOW so many of the debris pics have perfectly clean streets! None of your alleged debris pics has any dust from the towers that was 4" deep in the city.

Ah yes lose the damage battle and quickly he CHANGES THE SUBJECT AND move s on to the pick up truck of debris the fbi was scattering around the neighborhood. But whose neighborhood was it?

Not to mention released photos 12 years later had plenty of time to be photoshopped by the worst amature on the planet LOL.

but there was no hole in the building for those parts to fly out of! LMAO

couple misc pieces of unidentifiable junk, another 500,000 and you would get my attention.

No evidence trail.

The engine was identified as not from a 767 by leer.


However, the engine identified, a CFM56, is the primary engine of the Boeing 737 not the Boeing 767 alleged to have struck the South Tower.

Shortly after the article was posted, a Boeing 767 airliner mechanic emailed that he concurred with the engine identification and that it was not from a Boeing 767.

Excerpts from his email:

I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67.

THOSE ENGINES ON THE STREET IN NEW YORK DID NOT COME OFF A 767.

Engine location. Church & Murray Street.


Everything else is fake and you expect people to believe this is a real representation of a wtc plane crash?

 

Gotta laugh at the noisy denial. You can just imagine the planning meeting where the "ebil-gubment" overseer tasks his minions to distribute the pieces around Manhattan.
"Guys, make sure we use the engine from the plane we mangled, those trufers are sooooo smart, they'll rumble us if you get it wrong."

A thousand consecutive faceplants wouldn't suffice for this stupid thread.