It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID and It Cost Lives

JCS · Mar 15, 2023

AFM said: ↑

There is no scientific proof that human CO2 emissions are directly responsible for the current global warming. The links above show no scientific proof.

The models are not able to predict the past. Why is there such a wide distribution of temperature 100 years from now?

My arguments are based on the application of the scientific method.

The environment continues to improve as the standard of living in the US increases as ghe result of economic growth. What examples of degrading environmental conditions in the US do you attribute to increased standard of living?
Click to expand...

You forgot to add one more thing: "What the science shows is not true and the facts don't matter."

AFM · Mar 15, 2023

JCS said: ↑

This petition is from the Oregon Institute of Science & Medicine. Medicine??? Just how many of these scientists are actual climate scientists?

The petition is very brief. This is what it states:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

To participate in the petition one only needs to mark a check box to show that one has a Ph.D., M.S., or B.S. degree, and then fill in the fields. Unfortunately, that means that anyone can sign the petition, whether they have a degree or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are some major issues with the petition:

Since the results are not verifiable, there is no way to know how many signers have actually earned a degree.

Do '31,000 scientists say global warming is not real'? Maybe. But more importantly what is the significance of these signatures? The majority of signatures are engineers (10,102). 3,046 are in medicine. 2,965 are in biology, biochemistry and agriculture. 4,822 in chemistry and chemical engineering.

Without formal training in climate science the level of understanding remains unknown among those that signed the petition. A key question is not how many of those that signed the petition know climate physics in sufficient depth, but rather how many of those that signed the petition work directly in the field of climate science.

According to the data on the petition site, only 12% of those who signed the petition are indicated to have affiliation with atmosphere, earth, and environmental science. But there is no indication how many work in the field of climate science?

WHAT DO SCIENTISTS 'That work in the field' REALLY THINK?

In 1991 only 60% of climate scientists believed that average global temperatures were up, compared to 97% today.

In 1991 only a minority (41%) of climate scientists agreed that then-current scientific evidence “substantiates the occurrence of human-induced warming,” compared to three out of four (74%) today.

Source: George Mason University

https://ossfoundation.us/projects/e...s/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence
Click to expand...

The above proves nothing.

Scott · Mar 29, 2023

Here's something that's relevant to this topic.

UK Government quietly confirms Triple+ Vaccinated accounted for 92% of COVID Deaths in 2022
https://expose-news.com/2023/03/26/...unted-for-92-percent-of-covid-deaths-in-2022/

Eleuthera · Mar 29, 2023

You're wasting your time Scott. Those who are honest with themselves already realize they were duped. Those who are not will NEVER realize they were duped.

It is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. Or, you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink, just as you can lead a man to knowledge but you cannot make him think.

Scott · Mar 30, 2023

Eleuthera said: ↑

You're wasting your time Scott. Those who are honest with themselves already realize they were duped. Those who are not will NEVER realize they were duped.
Click to expand...

There might be a few double-jabbed people who see this info late in the game. This might convince them not to take the third jab.

sec · Mar 30, 2023

Eleuthera said: ↑

You're wasting your time Scott. Those who are honest with themselves already realize they were duped. Those who are not will NEVER realize they were duped.

It is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. Or, you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink, just as you can lead a man to knowledge but you cannot make him think.
Click to expand...

HEAR HEAR

Log in or Sign up

It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID and It Cost Lives

JCS Well-Known Member Donor

AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

Scott Well-Known Member

Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

Scott Well-Known Member

sec Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID and It Cost Lives

JCS Well-Known Member Donor

AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

Scott Well-Known Member

Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

Scott Well-Known Member

sec Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches