Is she a Muslim? Male, female (I hear young tight assed african male children are a favorite), willing or not, two legs or four, if they have the need they stick it!
Sounds like she has no orientation. Orientation implies direction, preference. She seems to have none.
Obviously the typical American dunderhead does. She is the first openly gay/lesbian to hold office in the state of Texas, and the religious nut jobs are obsessed with everybody else’s sexuality, since their own is so repressed, so the corporate news media provides a source for the people like to eat this stuff up. After all it is a moral imperative for religious nut jobs to have somebody to hate in the name of their God. Most of this idiocy would go away, and wouldn’t be prevalent if not for the insatiable need to provide such stories of diversion to sway people away from the real issues that actually need their attention and to be discussed. Like the economy, failing education, lack of jobs, and how the two party scam is so successful with the sheaples being so ignorant and gullible as to eat this stuff up.
Well of course let's blame this on the religious people. So freaking typical. I'm not very religious, but I know disgusting when I see it...and this woman is the everything that is disgusting at this woman is everything that is wrong in this world. "I'm going o run for public office, and by the way I mostly like to f*ck people who are confused about whether they are a man or a woman". Wtf??????
Why did you leave out female dogs, female horses, and female goats? How could you discriminate against them?
Yea and I say BS to you. So your daughter comes home with a freak that is a boy, but thinks he's a girl with a mini skirt and a day old beard and you say "oh daughter, I am so proud of you that you see him for who he is as a person". No! You say "I will get you some therapy, because clearly you are very confused...and maybe your boyfriend/girlfriend should get some too...ASAP"
I know that was probably a little mean and very harsh....but I have really had it with people like you. I say you are full of it.
Oh and people like you who are obviously are so offended over trivial nonsense. It bothers you so they give you more to feed the frenzy. She is a state rep elected by her constituents, obviously they have no problem with her, but her sexuality is being exploited by imaginary journalists, for some reason.
Okay there comes a point where I puke in my mouth a little you know? Lets think lesbian activities with a goat here.
You know....I have a reputation for being one that is not easily offended. But, this is just beyond comprehension that anyone wouldn't be offended that an elected offical would speak about who she (*)(*)(*)(*)s and why she does it! And the story goes that SHE CAME OUT TO THE PUBLIC...so exploited by journalists? Yea right! Seems to me, that must be exactly what she was after....possibly to get more dates? I honestly don't know why she wouldn't choose to keep it to herself....and we go back to why people have problems with the whole gay culture. It has more to do with them throwing themselves into your lives, than it does what they do in their own bedroom. They need to face the fact that more that 80% of the population DOESN"T WANT TO SEE OR HEAR ABOUT WHO THEY (*)(*)(*)(*)!
pansexual is bi sexual, that is why they aren't included in the LGBT community label. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered. The alternative lifestyle counsel has them under the category of bisexual, so they really can't have their special name in a legitimate sense, but definitely free to label themselves that way.
Why? It is because it is "ground breaking" teritory. Never have we had an openly "transexual" Congress person. So what is next I wonder? Maybe she will want to stick hampsters where the sun don't shine, that would also be ground breaking as well. That is not to say that no other Congessmen have not done it, especially with Cogressemen like Barney Frank around, but she would be the first to openly do so.
Well, I actually agree with you too a point but for different reasons. It came 'out' as you call it because of her affiliation with gay organizations, and her views on same sex marriage, which is an extremely over rated politicized viewpoint, definitely exploited by both parties to create a significant cultural divide within the nation. The venomous hatred on both sides of this mostly idiotic issue is obviously not healthy to our communities or the political landscape, and both extremes will never change their attitude or opinion concerning this issue, so what exactly is the point? People of the same sex whether allowed to enter a marriage 'contract' legally or not will continue to live an untraditional relationship whether others agree/disapprove of it, no matter which way you want to address the topic. Its a political diversion, and it seems to be working favorable for those in both parties, who want to remain off topic.
No that is not how it works. A parent is to guide their children and allowing them to take on a deviant lifestyle while you can help direct their choices is just bad parenting.
But that's not how nature made people. And personally, I find it sad that people no longer recognize that. Western culture has become extremely separated from its natural, healthy biological sexual polarity. Because it no longer recognizes male and female as anything outside of the bedroom after destroying all other elements of masculine and feminine in society and attempting to mush the two together into one ugly, grey unisex. Thus people no longer know what to (*)(*)(*)(*). So they just (*)(*)(*)(*) anything. Most people who push these alternative lifestyles have no idea how much their current views on sexuality are nothing more than a product of the environment that they live in. Even as little as 20 years ago, their views would have been different.
