Russia demilitarizes not only Ukraine, but also NATO

https://vpk.name/en/683531_russia-demilitarizes-not-only-ukraine-but-also-nato.html

Lars Bern is a Swedish engineer, Doctor of Technical Sciences, writer and publicist. He worked at Volvo on the development of alternative fuels and was CEO of Svensk Metanolutveckling and Environmental advisor to ABB. Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.

It is obvious that it is. Russians in Ukraine demilitarize NATO.
But what will happen after Ukraine?
I think that the Russians will return the Baltic states legally owned by Russia. Peter 1 bought them.
Agree that if Manhattan was bought from the Indians, it no longer belongs to the Indians. Is not it?
The same goes for the Baltic countries. They should legally become part of Russia.
And the Russians will bring them back. And ridiculous NATO cannot resist the Russians.

 

Wait... Didn't you start a thread on this very forum about 11 months ago, right after your boss invaded a neighborhood sovereign country that it was all over but the mop up? Guess you didn't like how that one worked out, so you're trying again with some more bullshit nonsense commie propaganda. Even Wikipedia doubts the veracity (and truth) of his rather skimpy wiki page, which shows absolutely NO experience in foreign affairs or military strategy.

A West Point plebe who's been in Uniform for 6 weeks could tell you more about this situation than he can, if he actually exists in the first place.

If you think that Vlad the ex-KGB agent who has visions of reunifying the USSR and taking over the planet has done any significant demilitarization of the US military because they have a few nukes that are older than I am, you need to have your head examined. He couldn't even get his missiles out of the silos before they went boom from the aptly named boomers that are probably right off the coast of Norway as I type this.

He's a joke, his military is hardly worthy of the title, and I expect he'll be dead, deposed, or both by the end of this year. And the world, including his subjects and cannon fodder will be better off for it.

I do hope he's paying you well.

 

Ahahaha.... I like your tantrum.
But if we face the truth, then the Swedish expert is right - the Russians use the political idiots of the West and grind the Western (mostly Polish) military, and Ukrainian rabble. As well as all Western weapons.
Putin is a genius in strategic matters.
The Russians have not yet entered into a direct confrontation with NATO, but NATO now has nothing to fight with.
At this rate, the Russians will soon take back not only the Baltic states, but also Alaska and California.

 

https://vpk.name/

Fake news, of course.

 

Ahahaha...

 

We could keep giving Ukraine our defunct equipment for 20 years and still have more military equipment that the rest of the world combined.

 

You have no response.

 

That's true. I wonder if they would like some ICBMs?

 

Ahahaha... It even took the US over a week to knock down a balloon.

 

The balloon got knocked down at the exact moment we wanted it knocked down.

 

I think what he's saying is that your current predictions will probably fail as badly as your previous predictions. Russian propaganda predictions don't exactly have the best track record, and now you are trying to overcompensate by saying Russia is going to take Alaska and California when they can't even handle themselves in Ukraine.

 

Some of us are willing to think twice about dumping debris the size of 2-3 buses on our people.

 

Or NATO is giving Russia a solid kicking and there's jack all they can do about it?

 

Yes. Yes. Of course we all believe in it.

 

Ahahaha... Is that how the Pentagon justifies itself?
The balloon flew over Montana for a week. Montana is one of the most sparsely populated states. But the Pentagon was afraid that the balloon would fall on people?
Couldn't they have come up with a more plausible explanation?

 

It is still a better response than what Putin would say the balloon is an act of war!!!

 

Rimbaud is a fictional character. The real NATO fled from Afghanistan so fast that people fell from the wheels of the plane to the ground.
NATO is not capable of anything. This is a paper tiger.
If you look at Britain for example. Such a stroke - The output of the flagship aircraft carrier "Prince of Wales" at sea was again postponed indefinitely after engineers discovered "elementary" errors in its design, reports The Daily Telegraph.
Or a funny tank epic. They cannot and do not want to transfer tanks for Ukraine. Even if they wanted to, they could not - most of the tanks in the Western armies are not on the move. And Spain, for example, simply does not have live ammunition for them, only training ones (this is the official statement of the local defense minister).
In general, NATO is NATO.

 

In Ukraine, the Russians are at war with NATO. NATO supplies Ukraine with weapons, finances, supplies ammunition and ammunition, NATO instructors are preparing the Ukrainian army, mercenaries from NATO countries are fighting against the Russians, NATO countries provide Ukraine with intelligence .... and so on. And in the end, the Russians grind everything.
At the same time, the Russians use less than 10% of their military potential.

 

So, Russia started a war with Nato by invading a non-threatening country forcing many to defend against Nazi's . . . again.

 

This is very Orwellian, your dictatorship telling you that you're at war with NATO.

“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.”​

 

That was a lack of balls, not a lack of capability. Which you know. And so do the Chinese. You gonna start cheerleading for them, too?

 

What are you basing the conclusion that it was due to a "lack of balls" on?

 

Common sense. It was over territory that is so sparse there aren't even cell towers, they could have and should have shot it down either in Montana, or even better, as soon as it crossed the ADIZ (Air Defense Identification Zone, a fancy term for if you cross this line in an enemy aircraft without permission, we'll blow you up) line in Alaska.

Now that I've seen some of the pics allegedly taken from the ground, I also question what we were told about how high it was.

Not to mention you don't send out a 1-star to give a press conference on crap like this if you're serious. Nothing against achieving that rank, it's something that 99% of people in the military will never attain, but when there is serious crap going down, they should send out someone just a bit more important. At LEAST as 3-Star, if not someone with the title of "Secretary of" something before their name.

 

Common sense is the refuge of the ignorant.

 

Cool slogan, bro.