Shutguns and revolvers

Clearly Able left rocks sitting around unattended and was the victim of his own carelessness and thirst for blood

 

Well maybe just the law abiding

 

Abel was not Able ?
How strange.

 

Regrettably, the same people making $ Billions from violent video games & blood soaked entertainment are the ones using their $ Billions to fund the same old Gun Ban lobbies to bankroll anti 2A puerile Parkland puppets.

You will note that "Attention" Hogg & "Skinhead" Gonzales were immediately "outraged" and crying "SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING!" louder than an infant with soiled diapers.
It's long past time for Hogg, Gonzales etc to grow up, look honestly at the actions of their peers & quit blaming adults for their murderous generation.

 

What does that have to do with the death rate/ time ratio?

 

Especially after being careless with those rocks

 

How long did it take to kill the ten people?

 

Longer than if he had an AR. Actually who knows since the official version of the time line is yet to be released. Doesn't matter though since we know the AR types are much better and faster at killing a lot of people. Las Vegas pretty well proved that at least until a real NRA hero get loose with a real machine gun.

 

What's the trigger pull to kill ratio for each?

 

Because knives are used to kill more people than ALL rifles, people who want to ban the AR-15s & so called "assault weapons" want to ban them BECAUSE they will not reduce America's homicide rate.
Then, the same people will be back to ban another category of firearms & on it goes...


"First they came for the "assault weapons", and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own an "assault weapon".

Then they came for the handguns, and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own a handgun.

Then they came for the rifles and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own a rifle

Then they came for the shotguns —and then I learned what "common sense" gun control "for the children" really meant."



(Apologies to Martin Niemöller)

 

The deadliest school shooting committed in the united states was carried out with two handguns, with magazines limited to no more than ten rounds of ammunition each. Far less than the number of victims in the Parkland and Sandy Hook incidents.

Therefore the AR-15 is less effective than handguns.

Explain how.

 

seriously?

 

If you can't figure out how eliminating bombs and automatic weapons and land mines and nukes and chemical weapons and limiting wars to only revolvers and shotguns is going to reduce carnage and civilian death then clearly you have a bit of a problem.

 

Factually incorrect, look to History.

 

Except all that would be a good thing which makes your analogy a bit disingenuous.

 

Really, please let us all know which wars were fought only with shotguns and revolvers!

 

Many of the Wars against Native Americans, to include lever action rifles.

 

Yes, I can see where disarming law abiding gun owners would, indeed, be a "good thing" for criminal miscreants and their apologists.
Until then, be careful whose house you rob or which Grandma you chose to mug.

 

Factually incorrect. Go about explaining how to go about removing all of these types of firearms from existence, preventing anymore from ever being constructed by those who have the knowledge of how such work, and limiting everyone to nothing more than shotguns and revolvers, to insure that firearm technology never advances further beyond that point.

 

If you are claiming My post was factually incorrect you could at least bother to point out the facts thst are not correct. You might want to start by learning the definition of a fact. And just for your education I doubt the weapons I mentioned such as chemical weapons, bombs, nukes, etc,etc could possibly be categorized as firearms.

 

How many angels can dance on a pinhead?

 

Better question;
How many nitwits can dance around gun control without ever posting anything of value ???

 

Is " only" a really tough word to understand?