I don't know if he does or not, but I know that Democrats are scared enough that he might win again that they're seeking ways to bar him from running.
Opinions differ. From "in play" to "could be difficult" Ken Kohl, a top prosecutor on the case, said at a news conference on Friday that felony murder “is always in play in something like this.” Legal experts said more facts were needed to determine if this theory of liability would apply. Jones said it could be difficult to bring felony murder charges. To do so, prosecutors may need to prove certain underlying offenses such as armed robbery or kidnapping, which do not appear to be present here. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...capitol-rioters-be-charged-with-idUSKBN29E0ND
Pelosi is absolutely right in this. We've never before had a president ready to work for the defeat of our own democracy. The president has sworn to uphold the constitution, and instead Trump is working to defeat that constitution and has been shown to be particularly dangerous as he can enlist the support of the Republican party in carrying out that assault.
Good points. There were declared objectives of harm against indiviuals, property destruction, etc.. There were bombs involved. If this attack had come from a foreign source, these domestic terrorists would ALL be in jail or DEAD right now. I'm sick of the soft peddling. This was an assault on our democracy. These terrorists brought zip ties and attempted to reach our congressmen. There were deaths.
Money is one of the few things he doesn't have to worry about. Gullible people have donated over a 1 billion dollars to his campaign fund. Of which I think he still has 900 million left. All of which he gets to keep, thanks to the lies that he has sold his followers.
Nobody (especially not "Democrats) are "scared" that he "might win again". That "narrative" doesn't even (seriously) exist in the Democratic Party. ^And, Everybody's Knows That. The Democratic Party would welcome a Trump 2024 Nomination. Trump would get destroyed (especially in the Swing States). And, Trump's Presence at the Top would have an overwhelmingly negative effect on down-ballot candidates. IF The Republicans want to completely destroy themselves (as a Party): A Trump 2024 Nomination would seal the deal. Run, Donnie, Run.
She's your hypocrite - why aren't you? Are the "progressive" sturmabteilung more equal than other rioters? Obviously, Willie Brown's Ho thinks so...
but you're the one going off the rails about criminals facing justice, we want it for all. I'll trade you your criminals for ours, deal?
He's been hugely public in pumping his public with the lies about the election. His calls for action to the terrorists who then broke in to attack congress involved clear calls to action. In his speech after the main event declare his LOVE for the terrorists - making it clear that his message of violence had not been mistaken. Trump is on tape attempting to pressure high officials in Georgia to commit crime against our democracy. And, yet the majority of the Republcian party accepts this!!!
FoxHastings said: ↑ FoxHastings said: ↑ Let's see how many of them get their bail paid for by Trump...... Deserting his followers is trump's schtick.... hope they appreciate his "bailout" on them Ya, hypocrisy is telling one's followers that WE are going to the Capitol and "I'll be with you".....and then running and hiding and NOT being with them...
He never called for riots. You guys have been lied to, but here you are. BLM / ANTIFA Rioters used Twitter resulting in dozens of deaths, police being murdered, destruction, and assaults on other Citizens by a mile. In fact, you can't really point to what Trump said, without you putting in your own inference as to the meaning, that calls for any riot. However, I can share a speech from that day (prior to riots) where he calls for the opposite. He then tweeted while the riots were happening, "you have to go home now. We have to have peace, we have to have law and order." For someone calling for a riot and insurrection, he's really bad at it.
I didn't go off the rails about anything and you're deflecting. Did the hypocrisy of Ms. I Was For Rioters Before I Was Against Them catch your tongue? Seems to be a lot of that going around lately... Democrats Were For Riots Before They Were Against Them https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/20...ots-they-were-against-them-daniel-greenfield/
I agree. Looks like BLM and AntiFa will be getting locked up up soon. Nothing could be more welcome to me. Start off with Susan Rosenberg, the POS of pardoned by Clinton for murdering two police officers and bombing government offices. This crazy bitch is now a financier of BLM. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg
you like to errantly spin so whatever enrages you is a soothing balm to a savaged America. the more you rage the better off the USA is
how many have been so far? 0? how many of yours so far? 40? just the dummies who got caught, now will get their commanders
Your opinion was not shared by two Dem Presidents who let bombers and terrorist who shot up the House of Representatives out of prison.
I pointed out the Left's hypocrisy and it obviously struck a nerve, Captain Hyperbole. After you calm down maybe you'll finally get around to criticizing Willie Brown's Ho...
Where did you get the $1B and $900M figures from? I have not seen those in the past but granted, there is so much insanity in the news it likely wouldn’t have been a blip on the radar. As for him keeping campaign donations, that isn’t easily achieved and definitely isn’t legal as per FEC laws on campaign contributions. His campaign can donate it and then try to fennel it back to him but with the numerous State and Federal lawsuits he will likely be facing... who knows.
Dude nobody knows what the hell happened. I've seen videos of counters running the same ballots and I've seen cases get tossed for seemingly nonsensical reasons. Idk and neither do you. Which quotes qualify this claim? Non-objective take. "Love for terrorists"? He called them "Patriots". No he is not and you lie by omission. Yeah