There is no longer a PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY in the U. S. Senate.

Currently, people who want to fund Planned Parenthood are legally allowed to shovel as much of their own money as they want into it.

They should keep their thieving paws out of everyone else's wallets.

 

All you have "proven" is that someone somewhere does not like Wiki - well Big Whooop!

 

And what forms of birth control would that have been hmmmmmm?

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I agree that there is a better way they could do what they do, but standing up for human rights is anybody's business who believes in doing the right thing. And I know you guys on the left understand that because it's the same mantra you champion whenever you stand up for anything you believe in.

 

And not every abortion is for convenience so the women do NOT deserve to be ridiculed and baited

 

Oh about 99% of them are... so you can stop basing your idea on that. You pro abortionists love to hang your hat on the extenuating circumstances as the norm. They clearly aren't. Every year there is over 3 million abortions in the US. 3 million. Take your little brain and think about how many deaths that is.

 

We pro-choicers don't care so much about extenuating circumstances as we think women should have a choice in any circumstances.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5212a1.htm

Results: A total of 857,475 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC for 2000 from 49 reporting areas, representing a 0.5% decrease from the 861,789 legal induced abortions reported by 48 reporting areas for 1999

 

Well everywhere I look I keep finding different info. Either way it's an absurd amount.

 

I've never seen any reported account or even an estimated account that came close to 3 million. At the peak of abortion numbers, it was about a million and a half. Anyway, it could be a lot more. Only about half of all unplanned pregnancies are aborted.

 

Basically, I agree with you. Frankly, I do not take pro-lifers seriously, and write them off as nut cases.

However, these set-ups of Planned Parenthood really do make us look bad. In fact, as supporter of PP, I sent them a letter telling them they were blowing the job of protecting the funding of PP, and they should fire their media relations staff.

If the right gets PP funds reduced, (which could happen merely as a part of budget cutting), the right will be waving red meat in the face of Pro-Lifers who are begging for a win.

We have to remember that Pro-Lifers get a crack at the opinions of the young when they are vomiting out all that religious dogma on Sundays. We Pro-Life supporters tend to come from young people who have had a need for family planning, or those who become educated to the facts in adult life. We have to acknowledge any rumbles of support for Pro-Lifers, and crush it early on.

​

 

We don't take you seriously because you advocate the killing of innocent unborn babies. Step off your pedestal.

 

You are claiming that birth control has killed women, right? Maybe that was the case many years ago but I don't know about today.
The pill does have some side effects, and it isn't for everyone, which is why a doctor will decide whether you take it and which type you need.

I am aware of only one case of the pill contributing to the death of a woman - but this woman continued taking it even though she knew it was making her ill. I was on that same pill and I didn't last a month on it.

Like any medication, there are risks involved but they are very low - the vast majority of women can take the pill and suffer no ill effects.

 

I must say that if I were a fertile woman, I would want the option of abortion.

Also..there's a problem with overpopulation IMO.

And yet more..babies are bad

 

To you pregnancy and child birth are punishments. Thanks for that glowing insight into liberal thought processes.

 

If they are unwanted, then yes they are.

 

Since when does it mater what the (*)(*)(*)(*) a search engine company thinks about a source? You are reaching so far and wide it's laughable.
You can't provide anything that isn't tainted. You lost before you started. That's why it took you so long to come back. You ran away the first time.

 

I am gonna have to agree with this. Or at least, they're accidents (negative ones) if so.

 

YOU want to use them as punishments. When something is forced upon someone, he/she is unlikely to see it as a reward.

 

Here's what the world knows about the veracity of Wikipedia.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/...st-issues-over-wikipedia-climate-information/

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/12/18/370719.aspx

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/10/14/going.html

They admitted to being tampered with. It's all over the (*)(*)(*)(*)ed thing.

 

Didn't even bother to read your links. Instead why don't you provide us with an encyclopedia source for the internet that is free so we can fact link? If you can not provide such a source then we are just going to have to make due with Wikipedia. ---No common sense what-so-ever!

​

The topic of this thread is;

There is no longer a PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY in the U. S. Senate.​

 

In the first place it's called "make do" not "make due" You need a better encyclopedia if that's how you use the english language.
I am not here to provide you with sources. It's called a debate. If you can't back your ass up with logic you need all the hogwash you can throw. That's what Wikipedia was designed for. A ******* source for horse(*)(*)(*)(*).
It is not accepted anywhere in academmia and they lean so far left that it's mind boggling.

You don't make any common sense at all.

 

So, you want to take it to that level.
Everyone of my posts is clearly marked that I am mildly dyslexic and have a problem spelling.
So, you are so desparate that you attack me for my disability?
You just told everyone, exactly what kind of person you are.


There is no "debate" here, you are a loose cannon, and do not know what you are talking about.
Every time I put you in your place you dance a victory lap.
Like everyone else, I want to give you as much rope as I can.
You are amusing.


Wiki is the only free encyclopedia available on the internet.
If Wiki is so far left, why don't you righties produce your own encyclopedia?
If you don't like Wiki, don't use it.
However, you will still be expected to produce fact links for verification of your remarks.
While it is not perfect, it is an accepted source apparently to everyone, but you.
You complain, but offer no alternative. No one is going to believe a word you say without link fact verification.
You are out on a limb all by yourself.

​

In case you forgot, (and we viewers have not), You were trying to refute;

$4 Saved for Every $1 Invested; Expanding Medicaid Services to More Low-Income
http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2009/02/23/index.html ​

For some reason went after Wiki instead of Guttmacher. Guttmacher nailed you, as a manufacturer of information, not Wiki . This is no debate, I am teaching Kindergarten! But, please go on!


The topic of this thread is;

There is no longer a PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY in the U. S. Senate.​

 

Don't worry even if there is a Pro-life majority in the Senate - they have yet to frame legislation that is worth the paper it will be printed on

 

i am 100% pro-choice. i would never take away the choice of someone else. i honestly dont care if they kill their baby or not. its not your baby or your body so honestly who cares. I believe the government does not have the right to decide what someone does.
this might seem cold and heartless but it is no ones business if you decide to get an abortion or not.