There is no longer a PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY in the U. S. Senate.

Why do lifers act like women don't use protection? Lifers don't care if she uses contraception because even if she does and gets pregnant, they want her to have the baby anyway.
Lifers need to stop lying and admit that they don't give a hoot if she uses protection, she should be made to have that baby regardless.

Why are taxpayers forced to pay for executions? I bet the pro lifers are happy to force people to pay for executions, right? So why not abortions?

There will never be enough adoptive parents to adopt all those unwanted babies. The lifers will see that sooner or later.

Unrealistic.

 

I'm for fair impartial "reproductive rights." I'll decide what's fair. That's impartial.

 

Because..it's not their CHOICE to get an abortion so it's not THEIR responsibility to pay for OTHERS to get their abortions?

I'm in support of abortion, too.

 

If it isn't their CHOICE to stick a needle in someone's arm, why should they be forced to?

 

Difference; someone that's sentenced to death asked to be in that position and deserve it. Taxpayers do not ask nor deserve to pay for someone else's brats, abortions or anything else.

 

lol @ this whole "abortion is right because the poor women blah blah blah".

What about the poor TAXPAYERS that are struggling to get by and don't need extra burdens on them for other people's faults?

 

Okay, then why should taxpayers be forced to pay for war? For bombs and guns to murder innocent people?

 

I don't care. I understand there's really only one way to get pregnant and only one certain way to NOT get pregnant. Accept responsibility for your action. That is my standard. So simple, a child could understand. No, not every child, as it seems to perplex so many here.

Apples and bowling balls. But if you're put out by the paying any part I guarantee we can get every execution done by unpaid volunteers forever.

The lie that allows you to murder babies. Better dead than....what? Tell us the alternative lives for these potential children that are WORSE THAN DEATH. Shame on your murderous 'logic'.

How could you possibly know what the demand curve for newborns anyway when so many are murdered. We have no idea of what the adoption demand can absorb. Thee is a huge shortfall as things stand.

 

At least you admit you don't care. That's fine, now if other lifers would do the same and admit that they give two hoots about BC we'd be just fine.

Prepare to pay more taxes over the years if abortion is banned. Republicans hate paying taxes so it shouldn't take them long to start complaining.

 

Shoving your tactics back in your face. Lick it up.

 

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/wikipedia-meets-its-own-climat

Read it and weep.

 

The BBC? LMAO! what a joke:

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/wikipedia-meets-its-own-climat

They would of course totally ignore evidence to the contrary.

 

There was no such thing as contraception of any real consequence before the 1950's. Abortion was illegal until the 1970's
It's perfectly realistic if you have no choice. It would certainly force the reduction of STD transmission when the consequences of reality are quite plain.

Your defacto advocacy of promiscuity has resulted in a complete decline of society.


But your philosophy is self defeating anyway. You will abort yourselves into the blind alley of history.

 

I don't think they should. I'm not much for military spending. It's hugely destructive economically IMO anyways.

 

Here's what wikipedia says about The American Spectator:

 

Quoted for truth, hahahaha

 

So women should keep their legs closed, but men, of course, can still (*)(*)(*)(*) anything with two legs? Nice, men always get the better deal, don't they?

 

If women don't allow men to (*)(*)(*)(*) them, then men can't (*)(*)(*)(*) anything. It takes two to tango. If they don't want to run the risk of getting pregnant, than don't have sex.

 

You stupid idiots.

The economy is going to hell in a hand basket.

The Middle East is turning itself inside out.

And all you can do is argue about abortion????

What about gay marriage??????

Don't you Lemmings ever understand what is important and what is not?

 

And this from the person linking to a site advertising "The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!"

And the author of that piece is such a corker too!!

http://crookedtimber.org/2008/03/05/the-republican-war-on-science-tierney-and-bethell/

Biased much??

 

There were plenty of abortions and plenty of birth control available before 1950. Abstinence wasn't a realistic solution then, and it's not now. You can't eliminate abortion by abortion, plenty of women opposed to abortion "change their minds."

http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0856928.html

Although contraceptive techniques had been known in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, the modern movement for birth control began in Great Britain, where the writings of Thomas Robert Malthus stirred interest in the problem of overpopulation. By the 1870s a wide variety of birth control devices were available in English and American pharmacies, including rubber condoms and diaphragms, chemical suppositories, vaginal sponges, and medicated tampons

 

You can bloviate about contraception all you want. The truth is that none of that crap quackery worked the way they said it would. The advent of the "pill" was what gave the green light to super promiscuity. Otherwise what did they call it the "sexual revolution" for?
See your cultural references give away your distortions of the truth.

 

If you keep your legs closed then the guys can't get there, child, unless they're Homo's.

Tab "a" goes into slot "b". Some assembly required. No tools necessary. Common sense a prerequisite.

 

She also neglected to inform you that birth control before the modern version killed tons of women too. Those same women that the pro-choice folks say all this is for, they killed plenty of women in the name of feminism.

 

I proved that wikipedia is a schill site. You can try and deflect from that all you want. Truth is truth.

Malcom X said: I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against.

Apparently you aren't.