Trump Is Disqualified From the 2024 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court Rules

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Patricio Da Silva, Dec 19, 2023.

  1. MiaBleu

    MiaBleu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2017
    Messages:
    8,631
    Likes Received:
    7,402
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    IF it is a 'dem thing" .....then the Dems seem to have some standards as to what is expected from a candidate. As stated before: the R's have lost their ethical and moral compass. Supporting someone with this many legal issues is questionable. . If Trump (and al l his issues ) was a Dem would you feel the way you do?? Doubt it. He would have been eliminated a long time ago.

    why do you and your ilk have higher expectations of the "left" than you do of and for your own party. (whatever it is now)

    Trump is framing this as his usual" "political persecutions". and One can be sure that the MAGA gang will chime in agreement. (and probably in unison)
    He will appeal. One can look forward to a year of Trump legal issues playing out in full theater. This will keep him in the news and that makes him happy. ( to him, bad attention is better than no attention)
     
    The Ant and Noone like this.
  2. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    not relevant to my point about carter threatening us athletes
    and yes britain competed
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Britain_at_the_1980_Summer_Olympics

    read this

    Furthermore, the Olympic flag was raised for the British medal winners in place of the Union Flag, and the Olympic anthem was played instead of God Save the Queen for the five gold medalists

    Point of order should be recalled-you appear to be WRONG
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  3. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably, but I'm glad it's finally on the table.
     
  4. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    how many cases have you argued or handled in front of the USSC

    if the GOP has the court then I suspect they have a better chance of winning if this happens again
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  5. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Republicans declared war in 2008. I knew Democrats were asleep at the wheel but that it took them 15 years to even start to fight back is fascinating
     
    WalterSobchak, Noone and Hey Now like this.
  6. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I think IF you commit an insurrection then the 14th applies and it's a State's Right to invoke it.
     
  7. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,479
    Likes Received:
    13,057
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hopefully more will follow and put that scumbag where he belongs.
     
  8. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you think the Republican court will rule against states being able to set this and then rule that Republicans can?

    At least you are starting to state out loud that the USSC is hyper partisan, illegitimate and should be ignored. Let’s make them enforce their rulings
     
    WalterSobchak and Noone like this.
  9. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,206
    Likes Received:
    20,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And that is what we call an appeal to authority fallacy. It's why I dislike when a court case 'decides' what factually happens, and what doesn't happen. Essentially the individuals sitting on the Colorado Court decided for Colorado, whether or not that it was.

    When Courts start to determine things, our own ability to make determinations is undercut as a result. The court system thereby is like a human God, and unanswerable unless enough other humans disagree.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  10. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably not. 8)
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  11. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    not hyper partisan-that hasn't really been the case since FDR's court in the late 30s
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  12. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I forget more about legal matters in a day than you or he have ever known
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  13. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It’s strange to see the same people that defend states deleting the votes of their citizens through gerrymandering now upset about the courts doing it.
     
  14. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,206
    Likes Received:
    20,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Speaking of the pipe bomber, 4 years later we still don't know who did it or in connection with whom. But I think we all agree the person needs to be tried and sentenced, and thank god it didn't go off.

    Because it wouldn't have just been the government, the other 'insurrectionists' would be caught in the blast as well. Including those people who chose not to insurrect or protest.
     
  15. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You didn’t answer the question
     
    WalterSobchak and Bowerbird like this.
  16. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]
    Who's we? The Colorado Supreme Court is NO "fallacy". 8)
    It's why I dislike when a court case 'decides' what factually happens, and what doesn't happen. Essentially the individuals sitting on the Colorado Court decided for Colorado,[/quote]
    Yep, that's their job.
    The Colorado Supreme Court said "it was".
    johnathan stewart2.jpg
    Well the U.S. Supreme Court ... kinda is. This will go before them and they WILL rule on it.
     
  17. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably not. 8)
     
    WalterSobchak and Bowerbird like this.
  18. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    well cases like that often are noted do not set a precedent I believe the USSC made that clear in the Bush v Gore decision.
     
  19. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    so how many supreme court cases have you argued or briefed? if none, how about federal appellate cases
     
  20. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep
    Yep
    Yep
    Nope
    Nope
     
    WalterSobchak, Bowerbird and Noone like this.
  21. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As many as I believe you have. 8)
     
    WalterSobchak and Bowerbird like this.
  22. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,909
    Likes Received:
    21,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    well sadly for you people on this board know I was a DOJ attorney. I doubt you have any legal training
     
  23. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, they dont.

    Dems have loyalty to party. That is it.

    Your perception of R's is simply incorrect. Developed by years of social engineering.
     
    drluggit and roorooroo like this.
  24. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,380
    Likes Received:
    8,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Valiant claim. 8)
    [​IMG]
    But off topic ... again. :wtf:
     
    WalterSobchak, Bowerbird and cd8ed like this.
  25. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep, that's their job.

    The Colorado Supreme Court said "it was".

    View attachment 232772

    Well the U.S. Supreme Court ... kinda is. This will go before them and they WILL rule on it.[/QUOTE]
    He didnt call "them" a fallacy. You dont understand what a fallacy is.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2023

Share This Page