Does "Israel" have the right to exist ? (2_

huh ? o k so let me, being working class- best check dictionery :

"in·vest   /ɪnˈvɛst/ Show Spelled[in-vest]

verb (used with object)
1. to put (money) to use, by purchase or expenditure, in something offering potential profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value.
2. to use (money), as in accumulating something: to invest large sums in books.
3. to use, give, or devote (time, talent, etc.), as for a purpose or to achieve something: He invested a lot of time in helping retarded children.
4. to furnish with power, authority, rank, etc.: The constitution invests the president with the power of veto.
5. to furnish or endow with a power, right, etc.; vest: Feudalism invested the lords with absolute authority over their vassals.
'''==============


So there : where's purchase ?
----------------------------


btw - Have you forgotten it was international boycott of South Africa which forced the Racist White regime to abandone Apartheid . ?

However yr comparison with the Nazis is stupid coz while Jews (mainly Communists - Leftist ) was minority - Germany Right wing White Sth Africans was a minority.


............





.....

 

Can you cut to the chase and advise as to what exactly was the "hoax" part about the holocaust? You tend to go off on a tangent.

Are you saying that a boycott of nazis was stupid and that the boycott of nazis is what got them murdered but that they were looking for it?

Is the boycott of countries with whom you do not agree stupid? Should the citizens of countries get killed for it?

Where is the hoax? Nothing you say above indicates what part of the holocaust should be referred to as a hoax.

 

I don't get it? What is the purpose of this thread? Are we to march the Zionist pigs back to the gas chambers? Is that where you are going? Looks like this OWS movement is really catching on. Now I see why the Nazi's are supporting it.

 

Its usually a safe assumption that he is using the "classical" sense, used by 99% of the world, to refer specifically to jews. Not the sense that you use.

 

Meaning no. 2 would cover it. People accumulate cars and books and diamonds (in effect collect them ) without any appreciation in value.
Wow Marlowe, you sure you are English?

 

I agree with the boycott of SA and with the boycott of the Nazis, Saudi-speller, and I used the example as a means to show that Bashadi is doing exactly what he claims the jews did wrong when Hiter came to power namely, calling for a boycott. Furthermore currently he would be boycotting a country run by a majority...so the nazi comparison actually applies.
Is he being stupid as he claims the jews were by boycotting a country for whatever reason he chooses?

 

Nah! ONLY those pigs of whatever shade you deserve being gassed . Starting with a fair number of Christian Zionists Seppo pigs.

 

A 1% chance of error isn't ' safe '. That's why I asked. The term is becoming more frequently used in its intended sense.

 

Sure it is Moon.

Actually that is an interesting point.

Can you provide some links as to where that is happening?

 

You conveniently overlook the fact that the country in question achieved its Jewish majority at the expense of of non-Jewish Palestinians , Before 1947-48 Palestine had a non-Jewish majority and their legitimate claims have not been settled .


-----

 

We were taking about and comparing South Africa and nazi Germany and the boycotts by jews of nazi Germany or Bishadi of SA diamonds. Why have you gone off about another country???

 

There are plenty of references right here in this forum. Some are supported by the Wikipaedia entry on ' antisemitism', some by reference to the misnomer in The Encylopaedia of Judaism, some by dictionary definition which does not accept the ' classical ' usage as existing in isolation. Are you going to insist upon being spoon-fed ?

 

Liebe - did you miss this re boycotts ?

http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...srael-have-right-exist-2_-48.html#post4584581


or convenieniently avoided it . ?

 

What action are you talking about?

The ethnic cleansing of Palestine was planned by Zionists before UNO voted for the partition plan. Everybody know that.

Even prominent Zionists agreed that the reaction of Palestinians was natural and understandable:

Why should Palestinians accept the theft of their land?

Prominent Zionists were talking about the "colonizing Palestina" against the will of Native Semites and about a war against Smites already in 1923!

 

Is that a similar insulting phrase to ' drooling **** daisy-chain ' but with a different religion inserted ?

 

I was also wondering what the purpose was. No one clarified that to me, but so far I have seen people who are supposedly concerned with the Palestinian plight posting antisemitic propaganda and rewriting the meaning of the word 'antisemitism'.
Sad, because this is only undermining the Palestinian plight.

 

I don't get it? Are you trying to be ironic or sarcastic? Is this an attempt at humor, or do you really want to march Christian Zionists off to their deaths? How is this funny?

 

I don't know unlike you I don't go to stormfront so I'm not on the up & up with the latest anti-semite (the real kind) slurs...

 

I put Liebe and Nosferax on my ignore list a long time ago.....on the premise that if you respond to irrationality you may be perceived as irrational enough to give their words weight worth a reponse!

I have found that I can usually read enough of their crap from the quotes of those who agree with them to include them in any response I make without suffering the reading of whole posts..and if not, the view post button is always an option.

You know, because of my ignore list, I can skip whole pages of Zionist bilge on threads....blood pressure reducing or what!

 

Or you could go and start your own little private forum where your muzzi loving friend could all go bash israel and the jews and leave this forum section for subject of interrest that happened in the last 72 hours internationally...

 

Indeed. Also painfully similar to our friend Bishadi's comments.

 

Seems sane but my method is rather different. I never ' ignore ' anybody and then when a potty-mouthed sectarian tosser turns up with some cretinous plagiarism I know that some previous post of mine has torpedoed some moral-free rightist extremist somewhere.

 

A straightforward response to your previous post.

However , IMO - a great deal of good will come by ridding ourselves of fekking Old Testament fundamentalist Christian Zionists they as abhorent as Muslim + all other religious nutters/ extremist.

- gas'em all.

...

 

lol, in between paranoid accusations, you should pay attention to what people actually say. I didn't say he took his materials from stormfront, I said they are typically distributed by strofmfront and the likes. How do I know it? Because I work for Hasbara, of course! lmao. Or because I know how to surf the internetz and have been debating online for a few years.

If you are infantile enough to need to "ignore" someone in order to refrain from responding to them, you are fully entitled to do so. However, you must be mature enough to realize that other people do not follow your whims. You are free to block any information you cannot refute; and I am free to do as I wish. All I can offer you is my condolences.

 

Is crap rhetoric your only style or do you get around to contributing at some point ?