Killing Babies no Different from Abortion, Experts Say

The question is, HOW do you eliminate the need for abortion ? Seems YOU can't answer that one.

 

HOW? What is YOUR plan to achieve that goal ??

- - - Updated - - -

NO, you just can't provide proof of your claims:

"""WHERE'S YOUR PROOF THAT "LECHEROUS BASTARDS" FORCE WOMEN TO HAVE ABORTIONS ??????"""


You have NEVER provided proof of your oft repeated claim





The ONLY thing that "hurts" your eyes are facts and those awkward inconvenient questions you can't seem to answer.....
answer the questions and they go away

 

Well the rate of legal abortions will certainly decrease.

 

You ignored the proof of bias I provided. Here again, Byron Calhoun's quote:

In a 1995 article published in the Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, Calhoun and co-author Dr. Nathan J. Hoeldtke write: “Since we serve a transcendent God as created beings with souls, we may never destroy human life created in the image of that transcendent God, except as commanded by Him. … As Christian physicians we clearly receive the call to be God’s ambassadors within our profession. The work we do must be consistent with the guidelines set forth in His Scripture, since we represent Him.

Do you consider Calhoun an unbiased source?

Once more, as I already answered, the PP president is not an abortion provider, and abortion providers can always make more money delivering babies. They don't risk their lives for the money, they do it as a service for women.

You have ignored this question:

Do you really want to reduce abortions, or just make it more dangerous for women?

Asked three times and ignored and deflected by you:

Do you think there would be no need for abortion if 100% of women used birth control 100% correctly 100% of the time throughout their 30 years of fertility?

 

I've made it perfectly clear several times I want to eliminate all abortions.

- - - Updated - - -

Then I will continue to ignore you and your insults. Your posts are just going to be deleted.

 

How?

Please answer: In a 1995 article published in the Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, Calhoun and co-author Dr. Nathan J. Hoeldtke write: “Since we serve a transcendent God as created beings with souls, we may never destroy human life created in the image of that transcendent God, except as commanded by Him. … As Christian physicians we clearly receive the call to be God’s ambassadors within our profession. The work we do must be consistent with the guidelines set forth in His Scripture, since we represent Him.

Do you consider Calhoun an unbiased source?

4th time ignored: Do you think there would be no need for abortion if 100% of women used birth control 100% correctly 100% of the time throughout their 30 years of fertility?

 

YES, but you NEVER say HOW that can be done.

 

If he is for abortion, yes, of course he is biased.

5th time ignored. I don't answer question I feel are just dumb.

 

You sure have a lot of fussy criteria for NOT answering questions ....



OBVIOUSLY your only real criteria is YOU HAVE NO INTELLIGENT ANSWER ....


Not answering questions is cowardly.....

 

If you read, you would know he is pro-life. So a person who makes a pro-life statement and has made statements about the danger of abortion documented as lies--is not biased?

You don't answer questions inconvenient to your position. Ever.

 

Abortion is dangerous in every case as one person loses his/her life every time.

 

And completely dishonest.

 

Head placed firmly in sand, hands placed firmly over ears, in full retreat....

 

This thread has reached the post limit and is now closed.

Shangrila
Moderator