Let's get something straight about Hunter Biden's guilty tax charge

LOL.. the level of denial it must take to be you....

 

The investigators. Under Garlands authority for the last 3 years. And Barr before him. We have FBI and IRS whistle blowers reporting they were prevented from investigating by the DOJ under Garland. I wouldnt doubt the same was going on under Barr.

 

Dont let Barr of the hook. While Trump was being impeached for asking Ukraine to investigate Burisma and the Bidens, Barr was sitting on the FBI document alleging bribery of Bidens by Burisma to get the prosecutor that was investigating them both, fired. AND THE LAPTOP that has the frigin invoice for the same deal.

 

Because there wasn't evidence to charge more than he did. That is the fact that YOU ignore.

 

But there is an abundance of evidence of FARA violations AND Hunter conspired with Burisma to bribe Joe.

 

So if the corrupt DOJ doesn't prosecute his corrupt boss that means everything is on the level?

that is a rationalization.

 

Rationalization? hardly, you've made two vacuous claims without a stitch of evidence to substantiate your claims.

Since your point of 'rationalization' depends entirely on the veracity of your claims, that point is without merit until you can substantiate them.

 

The only reason they are ignoring the mountains of evidence is because it incriminates their messiah. the only reason you are lapping up their dirty toilet water is because it is your messiah too.

Now say something about Trump in the predictable programmed leftist manner.

 

I think they think if they ignore the felonies and possible treason we will just all forget about it.

They will respond to this saying some poorly thought out thing about Donald Trump. I think it is a new cliche.

 

Unless the hyper-partisan malcontents can contrive a case for malfeasance, our Department of Justice will continue to prosecute based upon evidence.

So far, the natterninnies just blow gas.

Bear in mind, we are dealing with a cult of zealots who reject the nation's democratic elections if they don't like the result.

 

More and more evidence becomes public domain every day, and yet you willfully ignore it. What does that say about you?

 

that explains why they're completely ignoring the mountain of evidence.

It's okay I know you're Messiah can do no wrong in your eyes.

Hardison politics above country that's kind of how you are and all the little biden bots.

I wonder if Biden actually killed a child in front of you would you still be cool with it.

 

Unlike the cult of trumpery, I worship no politician.

 

and provide no rebuttal and only cheap liberal talking points..

 

If there were mountains of evidence, you'd have a point.

Since there isn't, you don't. Feel free to post said 'evidence'.

 

Like me, you probably prefer the system all other democracies use which is to have voters pick a party and have the party pick the leader. People aren't good at voting for people. They choose fame or pretty faces or pretty words or, worse, personal gain based on a politician's promises (vote buying.) None of those things have to do with competence. That is why our government is run by incompetents and has been that way for a very long time.

 

It says I, unlike you, am able to recognize what constitutes direct evidence.

I don't ignore direct evidence, and to date, no one has provided any direct evidence of any wrongdoing by Joe Biden.

Feel free to provide said 'direct evidence', you know, the kind that actually proves your allegations.

That you claim there is when there isn't, what does that say about you?

 

LOL.. no really. keep em coming. The WeChat message directly establishes both awareness and consent on the part of Joe Biden. Obviously you have ignored that. What it really says is that you aren't willing to see the evidence, and so you ignore it. So, there is sufficient evidence, you just seem entirely unwilling to listen which is sad.

 

Someone else paid them for him which does not make the crime go away and where is he getting the income to pay back the money from the guy whom he borrowed it from and is he making those payments?

 

Evidence not needed…. Reasonable suspicion to start a DOJ investigation is needed and more than enough has been uncovered.

 

So you're completely ignoring the mountain of evidence because...

Convince yourself of whatever you need to.

 

there is and I do that's why I made it

Denial

 

I ignore hyper-partisan propaganda, and recognize that there is no shortage of individuals eager to bring charges where there is actual, credible evidence of wrong-doing.

 

except for when you post it.

Just because you will fully ignore the evidence doesn't mean it's not there.

 

Of course, the truth is that I post recognized, evidence-based facts and documented quotations.

Just because you embrace fake news that fits your ideological agenda does not make it real.