Let's get something straight about Hunter Biden's guilty tax charge

just because you don't recognize evidence that doesn't mean it's not there certainly doesn't mean that it's not evidence.

Calling reality fake news is a conspiracy theory.

 

Some poor jamokes actually bought and still labor under the delusion that Trump had won the 2016 election in a "landslide!," that the election had been "stolen," despite not one of the fifty states ever finding an excuse to decertify their official results after recounts, audits, and investigations, after 60 courts tossed Trump's baseless challenges to the election, and not a single suspect in the imaginary caper ever being identified.

However, after fake elector schemes and attempts to intimidate Republican governors and secretaries of state failed, my favorite phony tale was the claim that Ray Epps was the man who controlled weak minds on January 6, when he persuaded a thousand Trump goons to attack outnumbered police defending democracy at the Capitol, not even one of whom who was identified, apprehended, and indicted ever even mentioning him in their defense.

​

It's astounding that there are some folks who actually swallow such crap.

 

@Natty Bumpo

Show us the DOJ investigation into the 2016 federal presidential election whether it was stolen one way or another... yes or no....

 

Okay, hot shot, show us the proof.

Yeah, I thought so, you ain't got it.

You never did.

You just claim it exists, and berate someone if someone doesn't agree with you.

I got bad news for you, that's not direct evidence.

Which confirms my point: you do not have direct evidence.

Simple evidence, the kind that is basically innuendo, isn't direct evidence.

I mean, an email that says '10% for the big guy" isn't evidence. Talk is cheap, cheap won't get you an indictment.

I mean the kind of stuff that will persuade a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

That kind of evidence does NOT exist.

You don't agree?

Prove it.

And I'm talking about direct evidence against Joe Biden.

His son isn't running for president, no one cares,

 

You talk sh*t but you don't prove sh*t.

 

Meaningless screeching about Trump without really talking about the subject only further confirms my point.

You're trying to distract with brainless babble. Like how a younger brother will red out their older sibling and they get in trouble to take the heat off of themselves.

I know I'm right but thanks for affirming it.

 

Like a flat earther demanding proof that the Earth is spherical.

Hunter Biden's corruption is linked to Joe Biden's corruption or as they say the big guy in the evidence you want to pretend doesn't exist.

 

I'm not Sisyphus. I don't try to prove things to people who won't accept proof.

 

Nice dodge.

You talk sh*t but you don't prove sh*t.

 

Nice cop out.

Fail.

 

You are upset by my posting irrefutable facts that contradict indefensible cultish dogma.

 

Yes, we know he misrepresented his drug use, because he was on drugs when he filled out the form.

Addicts don't need prosecution, they need treatment and grace.

it's 50% of those 433 referred and that's filings not onvictions, which is an infinitesimally small number compared to the 27 million background checks

So, if Hunter is in the 50% group that isn't charged, no one can claim 'special treatment'. If 99% were charged, and Hunter wasn't, they would have a point.

 

No, the house is not doing it's job. Jared got $2 billion blood money from the murderous Mohammed Bin Salman, and he was a Senior White House advisor, and they are doing nothing about that, yet Hunter was a private citizen.

There is enough there to warrant inquiry. That's it.

so, where is Hunter's testimony?


Let's see the transcripts.

 

You obviously never dealt with an addict. They don't change until something big happens like going to jail.

 

just like how I dodged the demand for proof that the Earth is spherical.

Most humans have these organs on their skulls on the front we call them eyes open them and try not to be the most partisan you could possibly be.

Beyond that I can't show you any more evidence than there is and it's damn it you choose not to accept it.

I don't need to. Reality is reality whether it's proven to you or not.

 

Having the evidence exists it's available for you to see I can't help that you choose not to see it there's nothing I can do about that.

If you want to call it a cop out for me not physically ramming something into your face while you close your eyes and look away then I guess I'm copying out.

That's not really something I feel that's a fault of mine.

 

You're ignoring irrefutable facts.

If it makes you feel better to think that I'm frustrated by all means do whatever you have to do.

 

Are you kidding, addiction is was a problem in my family tree. I was a child of the 60s/70s, rife with drugs and addicts, of whom a few in my family tree have died because of it.

I repeat, addicts don't need prosecution, they need treatment and grace.

Any professional in the medical community dealing and treating addicts will tell you that.

Clearly, you know little about their plight given your broad swipe, cynical, characterization.

 

@Patricio Da Silva

So Hunter was competent enough he could do multimillion dollar deals world wide, set up 20 empty shell companies, route those millions through those shell companies to disperse those funds through out the family...

but he was not competent enough to fill out a gun form?...

 

No, the reality is that you do not know what constitutes direct evidence.

Yes, I will reject any evidence that doesn't prove Joe Biden engaged in wrongdoing, because he, at the minimum, deserves that.

But, not according to the likes of you. Innuendo, hearsay evidence, blah blah blah, no problem for you, eh? --- you guys freely traffick in that kind of 'evidence' thinking it's something when in fact it's nothing. You forget that Hunter has been investigated by Trump appointed David Weiss, allowed to finish the job by Joe Biden and Merrick Garland, given full autonomy, for five years now, and the best they can pin on him is two misdemeanors for taxes, nothing about 'bribes' and such, and don't give me any crap that Weiss was blocked, because the only person feeding you that information are disgruntled IRS employees, well I regret to inform you that I have Weiss's letter to congress and Garland's testimony to congress which will disabuse you and all the other innuendo traffickers of any such myth.

When someone with eyes that can see it for what it truly is, crap, rejects it, you crawl back to your cop out and you think that makes you right.

Sorry, cop outs are for the lazy, the weak minded. But, feel free to prove me wrong, strut your stuff, if you have any, which I sincerely doubt.

Nice cop out.

Like I said, you talk sh*t, but you don't prove sh*t, you cop out.

 

Sure, treatment and grace, which many don't seek until they have been prosecuted because until then, they deny they have a problem. That or their lives at sever risk due to an overdose but prosecution would be better.

 

Your view is too cynical and too generalized, and I must reject it on that basis.

 

You aren't credible enough for me to read anything after this. Sorry.

 

Talk is cheap.

And you talk a lot of it.

 

Cop out.

Talk is cheap, and you talk a lot of it.

I accept your surrender and defeat on this issue.

You know you are defeated, since you can't prove sh*t.

And 'you'll only reject it' is not proof.

Yeah, I reject that which is NOT proof.

That's just it, you do not have a clue as to what constitutes proof.

That is why you hide behind a cop out.

YOu want facts? Weiss investigated Hunter for 5 years and all he can pin on Hunter is two piddly misdemeanors. NOTHING about 'bribes' or felonies

If there were any harder evidence, a Trump appointed Attorney would have done something about it.

Nothing you can provide to this forum counters that one.

Checkmate.