Religion is irrelevant in todays world

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by efjay, Oct 2, 2011.

  1. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You didn't even notice the change of spelling! Amazing.. and you wrote it. They are not the same.. Even your use of the apostrophe is incorrect for the context of the statement. Learn some grammar.

    Was it Gods voice when I spoke? No? Then the words that I spoke were not the words that God spoke.

    My words do repeat the words of my God,,, so I KNOW. But of course you don't KNOW what I have experienced, unless I tell you. Try again.

    God is not the one that is being a tedious bickerer nor is God an uninspired debater. Can you prove that God is as you describe? No? Then you are launching your ridicule at the messenger as opposed to the message..
     
  2. stroll

    stroll New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    Messages:
    10,509
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course I did, I used the correct form but didn't want to make this minor mistake of yours an issue.
    I suggest YOU brush up on your grammar.

    Yaahhhhwwwn... the voice is a different one, the words are the same.
    And btw, there are no voices of posters on this forum, but written words.

    I guess that's yet another tedious semantic exercise dropping into the abyss of meaninglessnes... :-D
    I KNOW that you believe this to be the case.
    I bet for the vast majority of readers here, it is pretty obvious the words you post spring from your own imagination.

    If your claim that you repeat your god's words here is true, then your god's words have the same characteristic as yours.

    Are you now saying you aren't repeating your god's words, but the words you post are your own? :)
     
  3. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Learn the meaning of words:

    "speak (spk)
    v. spoke (spk), spo·ken (spkn), speak·ing, speaks
    v.intr.
    1. To utter words or articulate sounds with ordinary speech modulation; talk.
    2.
    a. To convey thoughts, opinions, or emotions orally.
    b. To express oneself.
    c. To be on speaking terms: They are no longer speaking.
    3. To deliver an address or lecture: The mayor spoke at the rally.
    4.
    a. To make a statement in writing: The biography speaks of great loneliness.
    b. To act as spokesperson: spoke for the entire staff."



    There is your problem... you think too many things are meaningless when in FACT there is meaning and you simply refuse to accept that meaning or simply ignore the meaning when it does not suit your agenda. See the meaning of 'speak' above, and how 'speak' or 'spoke' are both applicable to the term 'writings'.

    Stepping on over to the field of mind reading now huh? Now you are declaring that you KNOW what I believe. Believing is subjective, so you are now capable of discerning the subjective things within a persons mind? Interesting. LOL

    A totally worthless bet on your part, because you have no way of validating your claim. What a loser you are.

    Did I suggest that ALL of my words on this forum are the words of God. No? I will let you and the others know when I am addressing you with words from God.

    Read the above statement of mine.
     
  4. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    64,087
    Likes Received:
    13,594
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is different from what you claim. Your claim is not that you are repeating words that God spoke in the Bible. This is different.


    What you claimed is that you have conversations with the Holy Spirit. You claimed the Holy Spirit was your first person source when we discussed Noah's ark and then you rejected my claims relating to history, archaeology, and geology because they were not based on first person claims.

    As such you are relating words directly from God in the first person .. not words written down in a book many years ago by an unknown author that are believed to have something to do with God.

    Using Lincoln as an example. Claiming to have spoken directly to Lincoln and are repeating what he said is different then repeating what has been written in a book about Lincoln.

    Your analogy is not correct.

    When you claim to be relating messages, or have knowledge of truth, from your direct conversations with the Holy Spirit you are claiming to speak on Gods behalf, plain and simple.

    It is one thing to say "The Bible says this" .. It is a completly differerent thing to say "I know this part of the Bible is true because the Holy Spirit told me so"
     
  5. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Explain. But before you explain, learn the meaning of a 'claim'. I make no claims.. I only speak truth.


    See above.

    Still not a 'claim'. Learn the meaning of the word 'claim'.

    See above.

    There is no need for me to go any further because you obviously do not understand the meaning of the word 'claim'.

     

Share This Page