Russia planing for WW#3?

Discussion in 'Russia & Eastern Europe' started by trucker, Dec 1, 2013.

  1. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Russia Plans to Have 4 'Massive' Military Training Ranges
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/...-massive-military-training-ranges/490617.html
    why so massive a training camps there is no need to build them so big , they should be more specific for the different parts tatics of the arm forces training, like paratroopers say don't train with armored tanks.
     
  2. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  3. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  4. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  5. Europan

    Europan New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wouldn't worry too much. The US Navy more than trounces the neo-Soviets, sorry Russians, in raw numbers of ocean going vessels, including over 40 attack subs alone, along with 10 carrier task forces compared to the Russians sole carrier, with the other one being pawned off to the Chinese as their first aircraft carrier. The US, along with NATO, has a clear edge over the decrepit SCO forces. Mind you the Chinese are determined to close that gap over the coming years.
     
  6. USSR

    USSR New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh yes didn't they tell you ,its not the build up of Russia or China everyone should worry about ,ITS US IMPERIALISM ,being run by a series of madmen.

    If there is a Government ,not a nation ,a Government hell bent on War its the Wall Street one.
     
  7. Europan

    Europan New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd rather be ruled by Wall Street than the maniacs within the walls of the Kremlin. NATO should continue maintaining its vast military lead over the despotic Russian and Chinese armed forces.
     
  8. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    so to even the odds Russia will have to go FIRST STRIKE option with biological then.. you know there getting low on oil shortly and need to reach out and take some reserves from some one soon.
    [​IMG]
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/11/in-the-oil-game-russia-has-the-longest-suit-to-play/
     
  9. johnmayo

    johnmayo New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    13,847
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your USSR was far more imperialist then is. How many nations fell under the curtain again? How many puppet dictators installed? Millions of Ukranians starved? Poles slaughtered? Czeks "normalized"?
     
  10. Europan

    Europan New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Russia would strike with biological weapons?! Think that over for a wee moment on why that is possibly the most insane thing the Kremlin could possibly do.

    FYI, the Russian Federation is a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention which states:

    The Ruskies don't have biological weapons.

    However the criminal entity that is Israel has refused to accede to the Convention. I wonder why?
     
  11. Xanadu

    Xanadu New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They show the people this military build up and change, via mass media. At this moment in time it is clearly used as a propaganda tool (and that propaganda works on many, because people don't like military build up or drone bases and drone strikes, and all kinds of military activities, it causes anger, by that resistance against these changes and things)
    Fear leads to organisation, and that organisation can in the end lead to dissaster, and then these tanks they show you via mass media will used.
    Organisation is the big problem in history, politics and propaganda is causing that all the time, and you don't notice (most German and North Korean people didn't noticed their organisation, most people today didn't notice all the change since the year 2000 (when lots started to change, lots of renewing, not real progress), and when they noticed a change it was another wrong move by politics, that caused anger and/or resistance, many times) History is always about organisation, every political topic, every change, every move caused it.
    They can change, build up and rearrange military and do whatever they want, because it's the fear and anger (emotion) in many people that leads to their organisation unnoticed.
    Emotion is the primitive thing in the mind on which people are (unconsiously, unnoticed) organized (over the last thirteen years very intense, you only have to look at the amount of fear, emotion politics (provocation, the nonsence, screaming vs soft voice), change, events, terror threat, crisis, markets, bubble, house market, banks, corruption, the billions and trillions amounts, and so on (massive)
    WWIII can only happen after the system have managed to organize a majority of the population to one (not only by politics, via the parties)

    The problem is that a repeat (imaginary, by politics and propaganda, or real) of history can lead to a repeat of history. Because the resistance against a repeat of history (via rise of political opposition) is going to cause organisation via a political party (which are mass-organisations) once again.
    People always pick, in their feeling, the safest side, but thats the problem, picking a side means immidiatly being part of another large political group or movement or party.
    Moving away from politics towards free and open discussion is the only way to stop political organisation, and really solve problems and progress.
    Politics is not free and open discussion, it's very controlled and driven by ideology (and non solving) Free and open discussion from the side of people means no master plan, no control and no ideology. Just solving things by agreeing about a topic, but every time politics is influencing people with their ideology and clever words.
     
  12. william walker

    william walker New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Post this on the military part of this forum so I can watch the experts take it apart. Laugh my ass off. Also learn something.
     
  13. Taxcutter

    Taxcutter New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    20,847
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Russians need to be ready to repel a Chinese attack on Maritime Siberia.
     
  14. KGB agent

    KGB agent Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Oh, don't worry, we are peaceful people. Ongoing military reformed is only aimed to ensure our military superiority over those savage crusaders to the west of our borders.

    Lucly, taking into account their degenerative culture, we won't need that soon.
     
  15. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    are you sure about that?
    [​IMG]
    http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/feb/13/smallpox-virus-vector-health-terror
    Vector laboratory at Novosibirsk in Siberia,
     
  16. Jeannette

    Jeannette Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    37,994
    Likes Received:
    7,948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The historical grievances of nations like Poland, are going to throw us all into World War III, because you don't know what's going on in other parts of the world and affecting Russia's very survival...like for instance the Eastern Mediterranean, the Balkans and the Caucasus. .. And when that war does come, and it will, Eastern Europe will bear the brunt of it. So I suggest, butt out of Russia.:oldman:
     
  17. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How would what is happening in the Eastern Mediteranean threaten Russia's 'very survival'?

    And how is Poland going to throw us all into World War 3?

    Do you really think that Poland is going to attack Russia?
     
  18. sharik

    sharik Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    no, what a bullshiet!





    .
     
  19. sharik

    sharik Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    but maniacs dwell 'within the walls' of Wall Street rather than the Kremlin's which is now a museum actually.
     
  20. sharik

    sharik Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    how it was more imperialist that lost the Cold War?.. the West won it , then it is the West most imperialist of all.
     
  21. johnmayo

    johnmayo New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    13,847
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We won because our economic models don't suck. We did have to confront you all over the world though because the USSR was engaged in conquering and subverting other countries. How many did you occupy again? I need that number that fell under soviet rule. There is nothing imperialistic about defending a nation and allowing them to run their own business when the conflict is over.
     
  22. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Modernizing military plans and hardware is not an aggressive move , stop being so scared about everything.
     
  23. sharik

    sharik Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    because of the West policies of preventing the USSR from world trade.

    by the Nazis, after betrayed by Britain.

    they themselves voted the Communists in.
     
  24. sharik

    sharik Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    that's a lie. USSR economy was all time best and self-sufficient while the West's is built on corruption and cheating and stealing other countries' resiources, and the West won only because it controlled the world's finances and banking, which the USSR did not.

    none.
     
  25. SAUER

    SAUER New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes. The moment of truth has comeĀ…
    [video=youtube;vJR1W6be244]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJR1W6be244[/video]

    Btw have you already bought this thing? >
    [video=youtube;ZlLOSLfm1VQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlLOSLfm1VQ[/video]
     

Share This Page