Why Globalization Is In Best Interests of Western Men

Here's the problem; men are not biologically hardwired to view marriage as a "partnership and working together to accomplish what needs to be done." Men are naturally designed to be the leaders of the family It's like this in the natural world and has been for us up until the last 50 years. Men worked (hunted), and women gathered (raised famly). Men have become crushed psychologically, socially, and sexually in the West. And women too are suffering because they are fighting their instinctual nature by working for a career over raising a family. Depression is at all time highs for men and women in the US, and that can be directly tied to feminism which has destroyed gender roles just to appease some ugly, man-hating, bitter, lonely, sociopathic women who hate the world. Just because you think marriage is an equality doesn't mean it is, because it isn't. I'm sorry, but I treat my girlfriend like a queen, and she is many times by my side. But she is NEVER ahead of me, never. There are times when I take the lead. That's just the natural order. You're fighting a losing battle. If it's not Western Patriarchy, it's going to be Islam. Women have two choices; choose wisely.

 

[video=youtube;nYYTLJ8YHi4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYYTLJ8YHi4[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Grow up and get over yourself.

 

""""""" Unlike us Western Patrirachs (??what??) who have been very patient with political correctness and feminism""""


LOL! You have been patient? No, you have had equality forced on you .....which is only right


Gender roles are only a good thing for sexist who don't feel safe if their biases and prejudices are challenged and CRUSHED

 

I don't mind "gender roles" to a point. I enjoy my femininity. I have no desire to be like a man. HOWEVER, I am a human being and not a slave. I think plenty of you insecure men do in fact NEED women to take the lead at times.

 

Ultimately, it's the women who suffer under feminism because they will find themselves at the mercy of whatever hyper-masculine, alpha males based group is ready to conquer next. The responsibility of creating, sustaining, and protecting a nation is always with the men because we are bigger, stronger, and more suited for it. Feminism will not defeat Islam in Europe. Most European Patriarchs have given up fighting for a progressive society, so Islam will just come in and clean house. Today's feminist are a Judus to all womankind.

- - - Updated - - -

In what I said, did ever I demand or refer you be my slave, ma'am ? No - not once. Your attempts to put words im mouth to qualify your own preconceived notions of men and my beliefs carry no weight.

 

You may not realize it because of your misogyny, but that is exactly what you insinuate. That men hold all the power and wealth and glory, and the women are there to clean up your (*)(*)(*)(*) stains on the toilet.

http://mentalfloss.com/article/31274/6-modern-societies-where-women-literally-rule

 

Why is it only western nations that need the benefits of non-Western cultures? A country like Pakistan would benefit immensely from a little globalization, it seems to me. When gunmen assault Churches and gun down worshippers, or secularists are hacked to death by extremists, or troops are sent into Kashmir behind loudspeaker trucks broadcasting the message: "Leave, convert, or die," it's not Islamophobic to observe MENA Muslim nations are in dire need of some minimum amount of tolerance.

Western feminists are not your issue.

 

WIth great power comes responsibility. You want to know what "male privleldge" looks like ?



Never has there been a more undeserving, ungrateful, hateful, and destructive group than today's feminists and Western women. They have no idea how good they have it. They're going to throw away everything for Islamic enslavement.

 

I think you come across as extremely immature and insecure.

 

We have been living in a global trade environment for most of the last four hundred years. This isn't a bad thing all in all. What is a bad thing is the the notion of Global government. No human being or group of human beings has the intellectual capacity to effectively govern anything as large complex and multifaceted As an entire world.

 

society is doing just fine without women being at home, barefoot, and pregnant.

 

who?

what?

LOL

 

I don't necessarily disagree with this observation. But I would point out that most people have a far too narrow view of what constitutes government and power. The Deep State encompasses not just traditional states, but private corporate, NGO, security, and financial interests. This deep state is already transnational in character. I'm deeply troubled when people focus on reducing the "power" of accountable governments and handing over increased power to unaccountable actors.

 

I am neither. I view myself as a Traditional Patrirach in a very anti-straight male Western world. Guys like me are Ronin, masterless samauri. We've got all the skills and knowledge in the world, but no one to fight for. I guess I have a front row seat to the destruction of the West by the hands of progressives. Just remember that when (*)(*)(*)(*) hits the fan and the war for America begins, the feminists and progressives will not be a part of it. You're easy cannon fodder for whoever is on the horizon.

 

I certainly realize that in most normal situations, men are going to be stronger than women when it comes to brute strength. As such, they are more cut out for job such as firefighter, police officer and combat. For me, "feminism" (I don't really feel that I'm a "feminist" though) is more about women being able to live their lives as THEY choose and not having to be at the beck and call of some helpless infant who considers himself a "man." If you pee on the toilet, clean it up! If you are hungry and the woman is busy, go make yourself something! Some men want a mom, not a woman.

 

It's the OLD OLD " " The Evil That is Woman is To Blame for the FAILURES of MEN" " theme ..... ( men can't accept responsibility)


And YES, if a man doesn't want women to have equal rights he is FOR SLAVERY of women.....it can't be any other way...

 

Global trade, travel and cultural interaction are fine. A global government would probably be a final, and global curse on mankind.

 

Right. Women have their "gender role" determined by men to serve and service the men.

 

The way globalism is going, there will be no White people over time.

 

But bureaucracies are almost entirely unaccountable, while business people are very accountable.

 

Fair enough, you want equal rights and equal access. Guess what - that's already there. Women are more free in American than every before in history. What more is there ?

- - - Updated - - -

Equal rights does not mean what's best for society. We limit rights all the time. 16 to drive, 18 to vote, etc .... We put these there for the sake of society. Why not on gender since there are obvious differences ?

 

I happen to be what some might call a naturalist, meaning that I came to a point in life where I realized that nature makes the only real rules, and all of them work. Man makes temporary rules based on what it wants to believe or what it needs to manipulate, and those generally work very poorly. When I need to resolve a question, I know that whatever the law or social principle is- if it is not compatible with the principles of natural law.... It's hogwash, and will ultimately fail. Without going into detail, let me say that this understanding has done wonderful things for me, from personal relationships to wealth to general happiness and respect of my peers. That is evidence of validity- it works for me as well as the rest of nature. Fact is, it will work for anyone who is willing to learn and understand, but there aren't many who are interested. They still think that doing the thing that hasn't worked before will work the next time if we just do it harder.

That said, if you examine nature in even a cursory form, you will see that all the various citizens of the natural world, virtually without exception, gather with their own kind. The various species have many different relationships and may share the same space, but they remain closely connected almost totally to their own- and there are good reasons for this. Unlike man, they do not invent magnanimous philosophies and then impose them on others because one thinks it's a good idea. They go with what works, long term- which is why all the thousands of species in nature have thrived for millions of years... WITHOUT politicians, laws, religion and preachers, psychiatrists and all the crap that we use to try and make us less dysfunctional and deadly to our own kind- and the citizens of nature have done that without destroying the natural resources of earth, filling it with trash and poisoning it. Of all the species that ever lived, only man is guilty of those things.

Perhaps it would be wise to look at their example, and ask- "What do they know that we don't know?" I assure you, it's a lot; but if fact it\s simple too; perhaps so simple we just refuse to accept it. We are the least responsible and the most dangerous of all species, and within our general class (humans) we do not get along with others except those most similar to us. There is nothing wrong with the fact that gorillas and chimps do not come together and form social groups and start dictating how each other should think. Indeed, doing that would probably lead to their destruction- Self destruction.

Freedom doesn't mean you should give your home or nation away to people whose beliefs differ substantially from yours, and not doing that that does not deprive others of any right to their own freedom. Species group together in part because it is harmonious and beneficial to their safety and sanity... They don't just keep out predators, they keep a distance from non-threatening varieties as well- and they preserve the philosophy that has allowed their particular species to thrive for millions of years. It's hard to make a logical argument against something so successful- unless of course, you think you are wiser than nature.

Man is capable of imagination on a vast scale, and we come up with some great ideas. We also come up with a lot of pure crap ideas, and invariably some jerk will decide that his would be good for everybody. If they don't accept it voluntarily, so let's cram it down their throat either with social pressure or legal imposition. After all it's for their own good, and they need it because they aren't smart enough to think for themselves.....

And that is why we are the only species in the history of the earth to be the most likely cause of it's own extinction. Stephen Hawkins has predicted that 1,000 years from now earth will probably not be habitable because it's fragile, and we keep thinking that we need to use our wisdom to "fix" it.

 

What more is there? Fighting against people like you who want us to go back in time. Sorry to inform you but women are completely capable human beings and can make their own decisions.

 

And what kind of limits would you like to impose upon females because of your insecurities?

 

Free trade and linking the world economically (through the private sector) are very conservative.

Open borders with unlimited, illegal immigration is not "globalization".