Part 13 of Post Your Tough Questions Regarding Christianity

Part 13 is a continuation of Post your tough questions pertaining to God/Jesus/Holy Bible and I will do my best to clarify and make sense of it to those who are unaware...I still have questions unanswered in Part 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9,10, 11, & 12.
Also I might answer questions that are on other members threads and so this will keep me real busy with the many questions that I will answer from my point of view/perspective keeping in line with Scripture.

I don't want my intentions to come across as converting you or whatever lol... but rather clear up things etc... so ask away.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=342641&p=1063643601#post1063643601

Is this why the english version talks about more than 1 God.
El, elohim, ywhw, etc. They had many different gods and not the one true god?

 

Since when is scripture, being 100% inerrant word of God, says 'hardened pharaoh's heart', mean his heart was stubborn. Are you changing the words in scripture? It sure seems like it.

 

What makes your version of interpretation of this book more correct than David Koresh or Fred Phelps?

 

He is saying we are interpreting it incorrectly, when in fact we aren't interpreting it at all. We are reading the plain meaning as it appears on the page. He needs to create a childish interpretation because the true meaning of the words are a terrible indictment of the god he is swooning over.

 

The point is there is nothing wrong with finding comfort in the Lord. You make it sound like it's some absurd delusional non-sense that religious people engage in. Your post below confirms this view of yours.

You should know by now that God can't be proven/disproven. What's the sense of us Christians trying to prove His existence?

When we give an abundance of evidence that points to the reasonable plausibility of the existence of Almighty God, it's only met with denials from the non-believers.

 

Well, at least he didn't say they were eaten, yet.

 

A blessing.

 

What makes your version of interpretation of this book more correct than David Koresh or Fred Phelps?

 

You know Im thinking about this, and Im wondering why a woman would go through all that trouble, getting preganant, morning sickness, carrying to term, childbirth, waking up at night to feed the child for two years, throw it the backseat of the chariot to take to the grandparents, go through teething, rock the child to sleep.......for the sole purpose of having at best....one or two sit down meals from the child. Wouldnt it have been easier to just get a chicken?

 

When you find your abundant plausible evidence, don't hesitate to post it. So far you are shooting blanks.
Desperate people believe desperately.

 

Now you are being completely disingenuous. You know you have not given any evidence for the existence of God and you are in denial for suggesting otherwise.

God ordered the murder of plenty of children. What Bible have you been reading.

God even caused children to be murdered in front of their parents.

1 Samuel 15

Yes God kills women, children and babies .. not because they did much wrong other than opposed the Israelites. That seems fair.

The Lord says he will punish ..... Isaiah 13:

Yes God ... rape their wives and beat the little children to death in front of their parents.

Sounds like a loving God to me !

 

Exactly! Well said WR! Keep up the great job!

 

There is no book of James 2 in the bible. But there is the book of James. The book of James contains many short, proverbial sayings and resembles the teachings of Jesus. James addressed several matters in which Christian behavior should reflect Christian faith. He discussed pride, discrimination, greed, lust, hypocrisy, worldliness, and slander. No where in his book did he discuss false doctrine being promoted by the Apostle Paul or anyone else for that matter. Why do you say things that are false?

 

Oh, and tomorrow, come on over and we'll eat the youngest kid. Great job WR. LOL.

 

I doubt they will find out anything conclusive, it will just be more theories for our finite minds to absorb...lol

So some advice for you...don't hold your breath...lol

It'll be more likely that science will give up oneday and just be honest and say since we really can't figure it out and all we have are theories it must be that...Almighty God did it...He is responsible for creation.

 

Science doesn't give up in the quest for truth. Theists do, and pretend they've found it.

 

I guess you are hungry here is your meal enjoy

Nope I said you are using children as human shield to defend wicked and evil people. And I said the babies that Alpha, you and your buddies are looking for were not killed by God but were eaten by the wicked people you are defending during the Noah's flood. That is why God said "the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually". Yes you heard me the absolute and extreme wickedness and evilness of man was so super evil that even before their babies were born they were already imagining how to eat them their thoughts and heart was so wicked and evil.

 

I claim that what you are adding to my statement is a lie.

You should stick with reality because the reality is that atheist are full of embarrassing contradictions like Steven Hawking would come up with all sorts of bizarre what if scenario how the universe begun but most worse is how atheist cling to the science fiction that human are apes.

 

Quote Originally Posted by WanRen View Post
Simple since you guys keep claiming that innocent babies were killed by God then explain Genesis 6:5 -7.

Where is the explanation? I don't see anything except the claim there were babies even though Genesis 6:5-7 did not mention any babies or innocent children what is clear though is that there were many wicked and evil people.

Waite a minute! do you believe in the Bible and God or not? If you do not believe in the Bible and God this would mean that God did not killed any babies, children, your wicked and evil people! But, actual history which I believe you believe actually recorded men for having killed millions including babies, women, old men, innocent children, human fetuses, and embryo by the millions and billions 1000th x than the wicked people God killed.


Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 49-78,000,000
Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) 12,000,000 (concentration camps and civilians deliberately killed in WWII plus 3 million Russian POWs left to die)
Leopold II of Belgium Congo, 1886-19088,000,000
Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)7,000,000 (the gulags plus the purges plus Ukraine's famine)
Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)5,000,000 (civilians in WWII)
Ismail Enver (Ottoman Turkey, 1915-20)1,200,000 Armenians (1915) + 350,000 Greek Pontians and 480,000 Anatolian Greeks (1916-22) + 500,000 Assyrians (1915-20)
Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)1,700,000
Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94) 1.6 million (purges and concentration camps)
Menghistu Ethiopia, 1975-781,500,000
Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)1,000,000

I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you do believe what the Bible said is true that is why you and your buddies are claiming that God killed many children although you guys are very bias because you all ignored all the wicked and evil people God killed so let me explain to you those babies each and every Gospel is base on a different situation in Genesis 6 clearly there were no babies or innocent children that is why Alpha and you are asking were are all the babies and the logical answer is the people ate them yup that was how extreme wicked and evil they were God said "wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually". The wickedness of man was so great that even in they imagination they were already preparing to commit evil this would include feasting on the babies and fetuses of the unborn.
View attachment 25614

I have already answer your question God is no trickster man are.

Yes call it what ever you want it for the unbelievers it is magic for Christians it is a miracle. Ok, if "call it what you want does not meet your standard than here it is God is no magicians only men do magic and tricks. See, it was not that difficult to answer but why is it that you guys can't answer the same way?

As I said for you it is magic because you are a man and man they do magic not God. That is why no one worship man, man worship God.

So now you want to use the word "regardless" it is either yes or no you sure know how to make all sorts of assumptions that are all anti God. I have an answer for that, God did not get rid of all the evidences after the flood He gave us the Ten Commandments and most of all the Holy Bible .

This prove that man are magicians and tricksters and my belief is what makes me a true Christian

 

But there are books outside the Bible, of the same period, supposedly by many of the of the people mentioned in the Bible. James being one.


Your quote . Exactly! Well said WR! Keep up the great job!

Have you read what WarRen has said recently. And you agree with him? Shame on you. And he can't even get his facts right. If the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt it could only have been for a fairly short period. They were there 400+ years and for a great deal of the time, free.
However WarRen and you seem to know the Bible is wrong. Thousands of years????????????.

 

God left out many details, His main focus was on the message that it brought. And did He ever bring out His message loud and clear regarding the Exodus story. Certainly Pharaoh got the message...quite vividly I'd say!

However though, He did provide more detail when introducing His only begotten Son into the world, Jesus Christ our Lord Savior.

God originated the message. He then communicated it to those whom He wanted it proclaimed. All of this was eventually committed to writing. However, again it is the writings (the message) which the Bible puts the emphasis upon.

 

Different gods or different names for God?

 

Why do you always need to post for another poster , a poster you seem to adore....???

 

split personality